|
Travelers walk past a monitor displaying a blue error screen at Newark International Airport, July 19, 2024 Photo by Bing Guan/Reuters
|
Last Friday, a global computer system disruption brought flights, trains, banks, and businesses to a halt. The outage was traced to a single update of Falcon, a software product offered by the cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike.
This domino-effect disaster provides a stark warning of the risks posed by today’s interconnectivity, says RAND's Jonathan Welburn. A special set of firms—CrowdStrike and Microsoft, for example—have systemic importance to a wide range of critical functions. And when they go down, so does everything they touch.
Experts call these big, interconnected, and hard-to-replace firms systemically important entities, or SIEs. One key step the United States can take to strengthen its defense against future meltdowns is to establish and codify a list of SIEs. Welburn coauthored a report that outlines a transparent, data-driven methodology for how to do just that.
The world has changed since the 2008 financial crisis: It's not just banks that are “too big to fail.” Identifying other such entities may not prevent the next disruption or crisis, Welburn says, but it will help society plan for the impacts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
After decades of the draft becoming increasingly rare, more and more countries are either considering reinstituting military conscription or expanding an existing draft. According to RAND's Raphael Cohen, this trend stands in stark contrast to the dominant conception of the future of warfare, which has largely centered on the rise of machines. It turns out, Cohen says, that despite all the technological advancements, modern warfare is still manpower-intensive. “As much as we may be enamored with the idea of increasingly bloodless wars fought largely by machines, battlefield reality has proved the opposite.” Read more »
|
|
|
Survey data show that a growing number of American couples are choosing to sleep separately, a phenomenon that has been termed “sleep divorce.” But choosing to sleep apart is hardly a divorce, says RAND's Wendy Troxel. In fact, it can be a sign of a healthy relationship. Sleeping apart allows each partner to create a sleep environment tailored to individual preferences, whether that's a cooler room, a firmer mattress, or a different bedtime. And when both partners are well rested, it can lead to a stronger, more positive relationship. So, instead of filing for “sleep divorce,” Troxel says, think of it as forging a “sleep alliance.” Read more »
|
|
|
|
|
Events
|
|
|
Wednesday, July 24, 2024 – Online
|
|
Thursday, July 25, 2024 – Online (More dates available at the link above.)
|
|
|
|
|