Please take a minute to read my WSJ op-ed
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

Friend,

This morning, the Wall Street Journal published an op-ed I wrote
about what I witnessed during the assassination attempt at
Saturday’s rally in Butler, PA. Please take a minute to read it
below.

Thanks,
Dave

America Was an Inch From Catastrophe, and I Was There
Dave McCormick
Wall Street Journal
Sunday, July 14, 2024

One inch. That’s how close America came to losing Donald Trump to
an assassin’s bullet Saturday evening—and that inch may be a
metaphor for how close we are to an internal breakdown in the
greatest country the world has ever known.

The bullet that came within an inch of Mr. Trump’s skull, grazing
his ear, whizzed over my own head, too. I was just offstage and
moments away from joining him at the podium to talk about my
campaign for U.S. Senate in Pennsylvania.

I am a graduate of West Point and a veteran of the Gulf War; I’m
familiar with the sound of gunfire. But it wasn’t apparent in the
first millisecond that the staccato crack that interrupted our
Butler County rally was gunfire. Why? Because I was surrounded by
thousands of fellow Americans in a celebratory, patriotic,
unifying mood. It was unthinkable.

Then I saw Mr. Trump duck and grab his ear. Someone in the
bleachers behind me was knocked down, and it became clear we were
under fire. In the military, I learned that you can’t predict how
someone will respond under fire until it happens. Mr. Trump rose
brilliantly to the occasion. In what will be an iconic image for
the ages, he raised his fist in defiance, reassuring his
countrymen, and showed true grace amid a lethal attack. He
demonstrated the strength and resolve that the leader of the free
world simply must have.

In the wake of the shooting, law-enforcement groups and Congress
will dive into important questions about how this assassination
attempt happened. How did the shooter get so close? Were Secret
Service protections adequate to the threat level? Did anyone help
the would-be assassin?

But these questions merely scratch the surface. What we really
need to ask ourselves is how we can keep our free society from
becoming a banana republic where political differences are
resolved with ballistics.

Mr. Trump’s critics need to acknowledge that he isn’t Hitler or
the devil. He’s a legitimate political candidate, and the contest
for the presidency should be fought over ideas and leadership
traits, not through calumny that can incite violence.

That Mr. Trump is about to be nominated after winning a contested
GOP primary makes his candidacy the essence of democracy. The
assassin was the real threat to democracy. Mr. Trump is democracy
in action.

Too many critics didn’t accept Mr. Trump’s first election victory
in 2016 as legitimate. And since it hasn’t been enough for them
to disagree with Mr. Trump, they’ve painted him—and by extension
his fellow Republicans—as a national threat that must be
eliminated. The radical leftist who shot Rep. Steve Scalise (R.,
La.) on a baseball field in 2017 likely took this rhetoric to
heart. The same may be true for the gunman who tried to
assassinate Mr. Trump.

This recklessness extended beyond rhetoric to action from the
highest ranks of the Democratic Party. In April, nine House
Democrats, including the ranking member of the Homeland Security
Committee, introduced legislation that would have stripped Mr.
Trump of all Secret Service protection.

In Trump v. U.S. this month, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in her
dissent that a president could theoretically order the
assassination of a political rival and be immune from criminal
prosecution. “In every use of official power,” Ms. Sotomayor
wrote, “the President is now a king above the law.”

Extreme rhetoric has also gained currency on the political right.
It’s time to stop the unending ratchet of political polemic by
extremists on either side who believe their opponents’ extinction
is the only option. This is a political sickness, and it’s
spreading. It isn’t manifest only in one party, and it can’t be
fixed by one party alone.

We need to put the engine of our republic in a constructive gear.
We have consequential differences; we should debate them
robustly. The left and right have vastly different visions, and
both fear the consequences of losing. So let’s have that
conflict—but let’s commit to keep it inside the context of
elections, civil debate and policymaking.

As my wife, Dina, and I tell our six daughters (who until
Saturday never imagined they’d have to worry about my safety),
our nation’s founders faced an equally fragile future. Benjamin
Franklin was once asked what sort of government the
Constitutional Convention had produced. Franklin’s reply: “A
republic, if you can keep it.” His words should ring in our ears
today. We may have only an inch to spare.

DONATE ( [link removed] )

Paid for by Friends of Dave McCormick.

Our mailing address is:
PO BOX 23537
PITTSBURGH, PA 15222

Privacy Policy ( [link removed] )

Unsubscribe ( [link removed] )