So why are workers having to create these standards themselves?
Juanita Constible from the Natural Resources Defense Council says the U.S. government has dragged its feet on heat protection for decades – with its rules dating back to the 1970s.
About 51 million U.S. workers are at high risk to heat, with less than a fifth of those covered by standards, the think tank found.
Finally, last week a
proposal was released that would offer heat protection for indoor and outdoor workers like shading and air conditioning.
However, it could take years for new rules to be agreed, especially after recent moves by the Supreme Court.
Farming and construction lobby groups, meanwhile,
have criticised early steps in the new process, warning of
burdens to businesses.
Just five states have passed their own laws, with a sixth on the horizon, while cities have also taken steps. But such efforts have met fierce political resistance.
Tomato grower Jon Esformes, who has implemented Fair Food Program heat guidelines on his operations in the United States and Mexico, said these protections helped attract and retain workers at a time of labour shortages.
He said May saw the hottest temperatures ever recorded in parts of Florida, just as farms were in full harvest.
"There's definitely a cost associated with it. Electrolyte powder is not cheap; breaks aren't cheap," Esformes said. "But you know what also is not cheap? People getting sick and people feeling like they're not safe."
See you next week,
Jack