Index on Censorship weekly round-up
[link removed]
Latest ([link removed]) Subscribe ([link removed]) About Index ([link removed]) Donate ([link removed])
Friday, 05 July 2024
[link removed]
We can't assume Keir Starmer will be a champion of all things anti-censorship
“The challenge in terms of free speech is quite profound, actually." These were the words of the UK's new prime minister, Keir Starmer, in an interview ([link removed]) with Index back in 2013. At the time Starmer was head of the Crown Prosecution Service and in the interview discusses the challenges of balancing free speech rights on social media, very much debates we are still having today.
It was not a cameo for Starmer and Index. At the end of that year he was on a panel ([link removed]) organised by Index on self-censorship in the arts. The following year he was again interviewed ([link removed]) by Index, this time for the magazine under former editor Rachael Jolley, who met him at Doughty Street Chambers, which he helped found as a young human rights barrister. The pair discussed online regulation, alongside whistleblowing and the Human Rights Act. A year after this interview Starmer was a judge ([link removed]) on Index's Freedom of Expression Awards.
The author of several books including the Three Pillars of Liberty: Political Rights and Freedoms in the UK, and the man behind high profile cases like McLibel (where he acted for environmental activists against McDonald’s) and a 2005 case in which 400+ people in Uganda got off death row, Starmer has a decent record when it comes to human rights more generally. But of free speech particularly his views are more complicated. In the interview with Jolley, he said free speech was a qualified, rather than an absolute, right:
"I don’t accept the proposition that you can say what you like, when you like, without any limits at all. Having it as a qualified right under the convention, hence the Human Rights Act, seems to be a sensible approach where you can…assert the right and then it’s for whoever wants to restrict it to demonstrate why it should be restricted and then it’s got to be necessary and proportionate."
That he qualifies the right to free speech might explain why Starmer has disappointed some people since being elected to the House of Commons in 2015, on both sides of the political spectrum. In the weeks leading up to yesterday's election there were a flurry of stories lambasting him, and Labour more broadly, for their record. These articles often highlighted the fact that Labour was the party pushing "legal but harmful" in the Online Safety Bill (something Index campaigned successfully to be removed and which Labour has pledged ([link removed]) to legislate for again once in power) and that Starmer hasn’t committed to repeal the Public Order Act ([link removed]) , which places unprecedented restrictions on protests, making it easier to lock up activists.
The purpose of this newsletter is not to go deep into Starmer's record – that would take too long and has been thoroughly covered by the British media. We also have time for someone who is thoughtful and considered, not least because free speech itself is not always free from complication. In the Jolley interview she wrote of him: "Sir Keir is one of those incredibly bright people, who has the ability to discuss complex ideas, and get to the guts of them, using down-to-earth language that makes it possible for non-lawyers to understand."
Today is a new dawn in the UK after 14 years of the Conservatives in power, a party that introduced many restrictions on free speech and threatened to opt out of the European Convention on Human Rights. They leave behind a country divided and with many areas that need to be urgently addressed in terms of censorship. What's clear though is that we can't assume Starmer will be a champion of all things anti-censorship either.
We will be sending him our action points ([link removed]) to restore free speech in the UK and I hope to meet him soon to press Index’s case. While we believe that our prior relationship with him and his background in human rights law means he'll be open to us and our campaigns, we won’t be afraid to criticise him when he and the Labour government get it wrong. At the same time, we will remember to praise him when he gets it right.
Welcome to Number 10 Keir! We wish you all the best.
Jemimah Steinfeld, CEO
Help support Index on Censorship ([link removed])
** Football can’t escape the free speech debate
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]
Following the controversy of the 2022 World Cup when organising body FIFA faced major criticism over the decision to hold one of the biggest sporting events on the planet in Qatar, a state with a terrible record on human rights, governing body UEFA have attempted to steer clear of any politics whatsoever at this summer’s European Championships. However, no matter how hard you try, politics cannot be removed from football ([link removed]) , writes Daisy Ruddock.
** Lukashenka unexpectedly releases political prisoners
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]
In a rare piece of good news from Belarus, it has been revealed that the regime of Alyaksandr Lukashenka, who was re-elected as president for the sixth time in 2020 after a disputed election, has released at least 16 political prisoners on health grounds ([link removed]) . The amnesty, timed to mark the 80th anniversary of the country's "liberation from Nazi invaders", includes opposition politician Ryhor Kastusiou (pictured).
** Belarus | Join us on 5 August for an evening of art, activism and film
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]
Following a highly disputed election, Belarusian dictator Alyaksandr Lukashenka claimed victory in August 2020. Protests erupted and a vicious crackdown ensued. Four years on from the election, there are more than 1400 political prisoners in Belarus. Join Index on Censorship on Monday 5 August at St John's Waterloo for an evening of art, activism and film exploring the true stories of political dissidents behind bars. Book a free ticket here ([link removed]) .
** Dublin conference | Say no to SLAPPs
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]
Strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) are abusive legal threats and actions brought by powerful and wealthy people against public watchdogs with the aim of silencing them. Due to the high cost of defending a case, public watchdogs can effectively be silenced even when what they have said is accurate and in the public interest. When SLAPPs successfully drive information out of the public domain, it is much more difficult to hold power to account. SLAPPs have proliferated globally in recent years and Ireland has previously been identified ([link removed]) as a jurisdiction of concern.
Index and its partners are holding a free day-long conference on 24 October at the Royal Irish Academy in Dublin where delegates will hear from a wide-range of stakeholders, including campaigners, academics, journalists, lawyers and politicians from across the island, as we discuss how SLAPPs have manifested themselves in an Irish context. The full line-up of speakers will be announced in due course. Click here to book a free place ([link removed]) .
** From the Index archives
------------------------------------------------------------
** Who owns the battlefield?
by Ismail Kadare
May 1998
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed] week Index learned of the death of Albania’s best known novelist and poet, Ismail Kadare. Kadare, who won the inaugural MAN Booker International prize in 2005, had many of his books banned by Albanian dictator Enver Hoxha. In 1998, he wrote for Index on the Battle of Kosovo ([link removed]) , translated by then editor Judith Vidal-Hall.
Help support Index on Censorship ([link removed])
Index on Censorship defends people's freedom to express themselves without fear of harm or persecution. We publish censored writers and artists, monitor and campaign against censorship, and encourage debate.
We rely on donations from readers and supporters. By donating ([link removed]) to Index you help us to protect freedom of expression and to support those who are denied that right.
[link removed] ([link removed])
============================================================
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
INDEX ON CENSORSHIP © COPYRIGHT 2023
** Privacy and Cookie Policy ([link removed])
