The Traditional Britain Group Newsletter - General Election issue 2024
Dear member or supporter
We welcome you to our latest newsletter.
At this moment, the biggest issue facing Britain is
the ever-rising tide of alien immigration. Virtually all of it from the
Third World. Those people who do not belong here, or came here uninvited, or have no right
to be here should wherever possible should be deported. If your electoral
candidate does not support serious radical action on immigration then for
heavens sake do not vote for him. This election has rightly been dubbed the 'Immigration Election' and similar trends are also mirrored on the continent, such as in France with the National Rally of Marine Le Pen, who polls suggest will win in the elections which be ending at a similar time to ours.
Lord Byron called Britain ?our tight little island? when the population was
less than a quarter of what it is today. Britain now has 383 people per square
kilometer ? four times as many as France and twice as many as Germany. London
and the south-east are twice as highly populated as The Netherlands.
Alien immigration remains the greatest threat Europe-wide and to the British nation. Unless this is addressed radically nothing else will matter. An alien is someone who ?does not belong here?. We at the TBG believe no-one has a right to enter your home without an invitation, still less to stay in it forever once in the door. This is the same for OUR country. The old Monday Club campaigned against immigration strenuously from inception in 1961.They published innumerable tracts demonstrating the disaster of it. The Daily Telegraph as far back as 8th June 2007 published an article stating ?migrants push birth rate to highest in 26 years? and in 2010 announced that 1 in 10 of the population was born abroad. So in addition to arrivals we have this births fifth column. Many of the terrorist atrocities in the UK over the past 30 years were carried out by aliens born in this country.
We now see how [non-existent] assimilation is being openly and brazenly forced upon us. In 2010 the new Equalities Act was imposed upon us supposedly making positive discrimination illegal. Yet the same year Bristol City Council was advertising for trainees stating Whites need not apply. In our advertising we continue to see it flooded with mainly people of African origin, despite them only being 4% of the population. It means 96% of the population have been discriminated against in favour of Blacks. These ads also promote mixed-race relationships, the percentage of which across the country is so low it is off the scale. Such relationships were banned by the British in our empire and remain frowned upon by most people today.
The two big parties have betrayed us. For the past 60 years they have failed to address the immigration problem, despite countless pledges and promises. They have proved themselves to be liars.
The two tired out, worn out big
parties have NOTHING to offer our nation.
One of the TBG?s officers wrote the following letter to his almost definitely
outgoing Member of Parliament:
?I thought I should write to tell you why I am not voting for your fake
Conservative Party at the General Election, a party for which I stupidly
canvassed for over 20 years and also afforded mutual aid to in three General
Elections. It is my belief that the Conservative Party have completely
abandoned Toryism and adopted liberalism and even aspects of socialism.
Their empty promises on immigration since 1970, when the party promised to halt immigration and actively promote voluntary repatriation, are shocking. They have in fact done the opposite. Margaret Thatcher?s famous anti-immigration speech in 1978, when she correctly said that ?the British people feel they are being swamped? was a sham. She won the election on it though. Since 1970 there has been far more mass immigration under the Conservative Party than under Labour. With it has come an unabated crime wave and mass gang rapings of OUR daughters.
The party has gone out of its way to promote ethnic minorities in its ranks, even into Cabinet posts, which is positive discrimination and therefore illegal. By doing this they discriminated against ethnic Britons: OUR people.
The Party has failed to take the advertising Standards Agency to task for virtually every advertisement being full of negroes and other aliens, at the exclusion of OUR own people. This glaring positive discrimination seems lost on your party.
The fake conservatives? open and legalising promotion of degeneracy is a disgrace and goes against Christian teaching, and the Bible, the mainstay of our cultural heritage. The party failed to repeal any of Labour?s legislation attacking 1000 years of our traditions, culture, heritage, and constitution, and left on the statute books the most appalling pieces of legislation criminalising free speech.
The fake Conservative Party has
completely failed our nation. They deserve to lose for these betrayals alone.?
Now Labour have announced that they will force all communities right across
Britain to take their ?fair share? of immigrants. No-one in their right mind should
vote for this national suicide. These traitors represent no-one.
At our last annual conference the famous Oxford Professor David Coleman
announced that at current rates (which include births) the UK will be less than
50% Caucasian/European by 2060. That is only 36 years away.
A poll showed that 55% of conservative voters wanted somebody
other than the appointed Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, to lead what they
perceive as their party in the General Election. There are rumours about
several possible replacements, but none of them are likely to save the fake
Conservative Party from being wiped out in the General Election. Maybe this is
because, finally, grassroots Tories have finally woken up to the fact that
their MPs do not represent them at all, and would not know what real
conservatism actually is, if asked. They'd probably say it?s all about
"growth". A party with a fake title and fake ?representative? MPs
deserves to die. To what extent the populist Reform UK can capitalize on this
remains question.
Please, do not vote for the two big
traitor parties which are taking our country and natural homeland away from us
and handing it to aliens who ?do not belong? here. These two parties are the
problem, not the answer. Voting for either gets basically the same
result. Time to sweep away these tired old traitor parties and have a fresh
start. It is time to vote differently.
We urgently need radical overhauling of the British Citizenship Act which must
include abolition of the French Revolutionary civic citizenship and a
qualification inserted that only those with proveable British ancestry and
blood may have our citizenship. No-one else. This has to be retrospective to
1970.
No gain without pain.
Immigration is THE issue. We stand to lose our natural homeland. Is it
extreme to call for radical action to save it for us and our nation?
We thought we should have a review a
few of the issues of the past which have either been brushed under the carpet
or raised as ?new? problems to be tackled.
Universities are lowering entry requirements all the time in order to
?attract? ethnic minorities who otherwise might/would not have gained entry.
This is totally debasing the once finest university education in the world.
The fake conservative governments have failed to tackle The Left in our educational institutions. The result is a woke society today. In history pupils use bn Laden speeches and in science debates on abortion replace lab work. The curriculum in State schools has been stripped of its traditional content and corrupted by political interference. No major subject has escaped the blight of political correctness. The fake conservatives promised at various times they would abolish Inheritance taxes and the BBC license fee ? a licence for Marxists to peddle their fil to our people on a daily basis. These promises need to be upheld.
Smart Phones et al have taken over our lives. Up to 20
million people now ?surf? the internet on these gadgets as they collide with
you on the pavements or smash into your cars. In particular, great worries are
now being expressed about the impact of these phones on minors and their use in
schools. But this is not new. An article in the Daily Telegraph on 19th
August 2020 was entitled ?How television, phones and Facebook are taking over
daily life?. Of course, this problem has blossomed since then. People need to
get a life.
The TBG, recognizing that Britain is broke and borrowing money weekly,
continues to call for the complete abolition of all forms of overseas aid.
Who can forget that we contributed ?500 annually to the EU?s aid budget. One EU
project, founded in 2008, at a cost of ?8.8 million set up a job centre in
Bamako, the capital of Mali (former French West Africa) to help people seeking
employment in Europe! Over three years only six jobs were found, a cost of ?1.5
million for each post.
We should at least bring to your attention one of our smaller parties,
the English Democrats. They are fielding the following candidates:
Shrewsbury and Atcham ? Christopher
Bovill
East Grinstead & Uckfield ? William Highton
Leigh and Atherton ? Craig Alan Buckley
Bolton West ? Patrick McGrath
Makerfield ? Thomas Bryer
Dover and Deal ? Stephen Laws
Bradford South ? Therese Hirst
Newark ? Matthew Darrington
Brentwood and Ongar ? Robin Tilbrook
Boston and Skegness ? David Dickason
Great Yarmouth ? Catherine Blaiklock
Bury South ? Stephen Morris
Dunstable & Leighton Buzzard ?
Antonio Vitellio
Barnsley South ? Maxine Spencer
Barnsley North ? Janus Polenceusz
Those of you who attended our Christmas Social will know that it was
another great success, with Viscount St. Davids giving us a splendid address.
We also had an additional guest and talk by the AfD?s Gunnar Beck, M.E.P., who had addressed our conference in
2021. Those of you who also attended our
October conference heard a line-up of first-class speakers, as usual. Those
speeches should now be available on our Youtube channel. We do ask you,
however, to support our conferences in person. At our Black-Tie Dinner this June, we were addressed by Gerard Dugdill, Chairman of the British Counties campaign. Both can be found on our YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TraditionalbritainOrg/videos
We should advise you all that our enemies, whether they be the Far-Left
or the Establishment, have been advising London venues not to host our
events, suggesting that our aims and objectives are illiberal,
Far-Right, etc., and their staff will be at moral risk. For 24 years our behaviour in
all the venues we have used has been exemplary and all staff treated with every
possible courtesy, as you would expect. We are constantly told that we are
living in a pluralist democracy where everyone?s political views should have
equal value. Our aims and objectives support this and support Britain and her
peoples. But they oppose multiculturalism and the invasion that has been
underway these past five decades. It is our democratic right to oppose mass
immigration into our natural homeland and not to be penalised for it. We also
have a range of other aims.
The Charing Cross Hotel?s new owners, the Clermont Group, where we have staged
innumerable functions for 20 years, and given them thousands of pounds in
revenue, treating their staff with every possible respect, told us they would
not accept further bookings from us for any hotel in their group after our 2022
conference. The ?security of our staff? was the only reason given.
Unfortunately, we failed to properly pursue them on this within the given legal
time limits. In January 2023 we booked a club in St. James?s, where we had
previously been for a few events, and within a short time the Director of the Club cancelled our agreed
and signed contract, saying they disapproved of our ?ethos?. We sued them under
the 2010 Equalities Act and received a satisfactory out of court settlement. We
then booked a hotel in Bloomsbury for our conference. All the details were
agreed and contracts exchanged and paid. Nine days before the event was to take
place they cancelled, again a clear breach of contract, saying that they could
not have us because we were against multiculturalism etc. It took them 8 months
to reach this conclusion. This was obviously a wrecking action. We currently
await their out-of-court settlement. We then booked a hotel in Mayfair where we
had been before and they too cancelled the signed contract four days later. We
again sued and we have received an out-of-court satisfactory settlement. So you
can see here that someone is contacting venues and warning them not to host
events for a perfectly legitimate and respectable group of people, because they
oppose them politically. This is
against the law. You may well ask whether these hotels and clubs, give a
questionnaire to every guest and member, as well as organizations and companies
who wish to hold functions there, as to their political beliefs. If not why
not? One thing has become clear is that contracts are not worth the paper they
are written on. We fight on!
As it was, our energetic committee found another very suitable venue just five
days prior to the day of our conference. We were looked after very well and
everyone who attended had a most enjoyable time, including going to the pub round
the corner afterwards for a good evening of discussions.
In a similar way, the enemies of our freedoms continue to find false ways to subvert our messages on social media. The effective private monopoly Facebook took action after one of our pages (Traditional Britain Under Attack) reached almost 70,000 subscribers and nearly 30 million views per month. They now continually try to find reasons to limit our reach through their dark algorithms. The most recent example was classifying a post as 'spam' for bringing to our audience's attention the roll out of emotion detection CCTV at London railway stations as covered in multiple outlets, e.g. here. There is no appeal and the result is retricted reach. During an election cycle such nefarious behaviour is particularly egregious. We view this near monopoly social media platform with 45 million UK users as a threat to our democracy as so many of the particularly older generation now use it to be updated on news and trends. They appear to continually use their so-called 'Community Standards' to suppress content they dislike on thousands of pages, not just our own. Indeed in Belgium, an MEP has won a case in their courts over this issue, which Facebook is seeking to set aside. See here. Why should a US-based behemoth with murky roots and ties be allowed to have such an impact on communications in Britain and globally? They say they are not a 'publisher' but just a communications 'platform'. Imagine if your telephone provider used AI to understand your opinions and then restricted you from speaking to your network?
The TBG also continues to raise awareness of the so-called hate crime
scenario in the UK (despite the fact that virtually no-one expresses clear
?hate?) which our unrepresentative politicians have imposed upon us. This
legislation is, let us not forget, aimed at the indigenous population of Britain
in favour of aliens. For those of you who no longer buy a printed newspaper we
thought we should reproduce the following article from The Daily Telegraph on
March 26th:
All Humza Yousaf?s Hate Crime Act will achieve is to stir up more hatred
Humza
Yousaf?s new legislation supports a load of nonsense at the expense of free
speech
Is beautiful Scotland about to become the most hateful country in the
world? We shall know soon enough on All Fools? Day when Humza
Yousaf?s Hate Crime Act comes into being. This legislation was passed in
2021 when Yousaf was Justice Secretary and it creates a new and somewhat vague
offence of ?stirring up hatred?.
This is not vague enough, however, for the usual suspects: lawyers who have got high on their own narcissistic supply, have already called for the arrest of J K Rowling. Some trans activists are passing around Police Scotland forms, agitating by saying: ?Save this form and get dobbing in Terfs on the 1st of April. You can do it anonymously. I know I will.?
Murdo Fraser (Conservative SMP) is saying he will take legal action against the Police for recording a tweet he sent last year as a ?non-crime hate incident?. The incendiary comment? ?Choosing to identify as ?non-binary? is as valid as choosing to identify as a cat. I?m not sure governments should be spending time on action plans for either.?
I am with the pussies here who are ignored in this legislation but, come on, is this really what the police should be doing?
Whatever the intention behind this legislation, it is already looking completely unworkable and, quite honestly, mad.
You might think after the collapse of Sturgeon, after misreading the room/country on self-ID, that the government had better things to do. The Scottish public, in poll after poll, list their main concerns as the cost of living crisis, health, education and transport.
There already was legislation, which makes being abusive or threatening to another person criminal. What is all this for apart from the strange march of the SNP into progressive authoritarianism? Now, children can report their parents for hate crime, neighbours can go to a sex store or mushroom farm, not a nasty old police station (I am not making this up) to shop their neighbours. All of social media will now have to be policed ? not by the billionaires who make money out of it ? but the police.
Some hairy relative of the Honey Monster appeared in a cartoon warning young, working-class men not to give in to the Hate Monster. This managed to be both classist and inane at the same time. The Edinburgh Fringe is bracing itself, not for anything actually funny, but for comics who will either go along with the orthodoxy or those who deliberately won?t. Either is monumentally dull.
Of course, stirring up hatred is a bad thing. It is then usually accompanied by a threat or a move towards violence and this is how hate crime legislation actually works in practice. The speech is usually an aggravating factor, not the only factor. We already have much legislation in place to deal with this. (The Public Order Act 1986, the Communications Act 2003, the Terrorism Act 2006.)
This is why those concerned with free speech are up in arms about this. We don?t have a written constitution, which would limit the powers of institutions on this matter. We have this unspoken understanding. Until we don?t? Most of us do not think about free speech until ours is threatened. Mine never has been. Public criticism of my controversial view that biology exists is not the same as having one?s speech curtailed, but it does make one alert to that possibility.
We currently live in a culture where the punishment for challenging the ideology is not prison but social censure. Women cannot say what they think at work if they are in the arts, education, the public sector or much of the media. Only recently, I was at an artsy do where one person after another sidled up to say they agreed with me but they just don?t want to say so in public. This means they continue to prop up a load of nonsense, which is construed by paternalistic leaders as somehow popular, when it never is.
If any of this was, in the end, about making the lives of the tiny number of trans people in the UK better I would support it. Instead, it just sharpens the conflict between women?s rights and trans rights by not even acknowledging ?sex? at all. If this isn?t ?stirring up hatred?, I don?t know what is.
It reminds me of what the brilliant Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie said of an argument with an ex-student: ?What matters is not goodness but the appearance of goodness ?We are now angels jostling to out-angel one another.? No one expects politicians to be angels, we expect them to produce sensible and workable laws.
One would have to
live in an almighty bubble to have produced this McCarthyite lunacy.
Still, it only takes one small prick to burst a bubble. I cannot believe one
can?t be found in the whole of Scotland.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/columnists/2024/03/26/scotland-hate-crime-act-humza-yousaf-snp-trans-self-id/
Whilst we are thankful that Yousaf was
forced to resign his wretched anti-British and anti-Scottish legislation
remains in place as his hateful legacy.
Many thanks, as always to those of you
who have continued to maintain your membership of the Traditional Britain
Group. We have maintained our modest rates for years and the majority of
you will realise that a yearly rate so low is amazing.
We continue our very busy activities across social media, getting our message
out and raising our people?s awareness to everything that is wrong in Britain.
We were extremely pleased to welcome to our ranks as a new TBG Vice President, Robin Tilbrook, the renowned solicitor who broke new ground in securing ?450,000 for one of the Rotherham gang-rape victims. If you need a good solicitor, do try Robin!
Lastly
our Vice-President Gregory Lauder-Frost was one of those who addressed the 2024
Spring Conference of the English Democrats Party. Outlining the major aims and
objectives of the TBG he emphasised that without radical action our nation is
finished. He was well-received.
This year our conference will be on Saturday October 12th.
Please put this in your diaries now and make every possible effort to attend to
demonstrate your absolute support for us and for our people.
For all online TBG content please see this link which includes all of our social media, our Metapedia, our website and so forth: https://linktr.ee/traditional
We thank you for getting this far and we extend our best wishes for a healthy and productive summertime going forwards.
Unsubscribe: If you no longer would like to receive these occassional messages, please let us know by way of reply.