From Freedom of the Press Foundation <[email protected]>
Subject Assange freed, press freedom imperiled
Date June 28, 2024 10:31 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
‘Real’ journalists safe? Yeah, right

View this email in your browser ([link removed])

Dear Friend of Press Freedom,

Here are some of the most important stories we’re following from the U.S. and around the world. If you enjoy reading this newsletter, please forward it to friends and family. If someone has forwarded you this newsletter,please subscribe here ([link removed]) .
File:RUEDA DE PRENSA CONJUNTA ENTRE CANCILLER RICARDO PATIÑO Y JULIAN ASSANGE - 14953880621.jpg by Cancillería del Ecuador is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.

Assange freed, press freedom imperiled

Julian Assange has finally been freed ([link removed]) after reaching a surprising deal with U.S. authorities to plead guilty to violating the Espionage Act.

Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) Executive Director Trevor Timm wrote in The Guardian ([link removed]) that, “While it should be a relief to anyone who cares about press freedom that Assange will not be coming to the US to face trial, the Biden administration should be ashamed at how this case has played out.”

The plea deal avoids the worst outcome of a court precedent that could be used against journalists, but it still threatens press freedom ([link removed]) . As FPF Advocacy Director Seth Stern wrote in the Daily Beast ([link removed]) , the only impact of the plea agreement “will be to legitimize the criminalization of routine journalistic conduct and encourage future administrations to follow suit—including a potential second Trump administration.”

For more, watch Timm and Stern weigh in on the alarming implications for journalists and the press ([link removed]) , as well as Timm’s appearance on PBS News Hour ([link removed]) .

‘Real’ journalists safe? Yeah, right

Stern also wrote ([link removed]) on our website about an alarming Voice of America ([link removed]) report regarding rules that bar journalists at the military newspaper Stars and Stripes from publishing classified information. Comments from the Defense Department suggest that it believes that Stars & Stripes reporters are subject to the Espionage Act ([link removed]) , the same law used to prosecute Assange.

Those defending the Assange prosecution have often assured ([link removed]) the public that his case was unique — no one would come after “real” journalists doing their job. Well, then Stars and Stripes reporters must not be real journalists either, because it sure sounds like the Defense Department believes the Espionage Act applies to them too.

You can’t spell SLAPP without LA

Public officials who should know better keep ignoring journalists' First Amendment rights. A prime example: the two ridiculous lawsuits ([link removed]) the City of Los Angeles filed against journalist Ben Camacho ([link removed]) over his publishing pictures the city itself gave him.

We recently wrote ([link removed]) about the city’s dismissal of one of the lawsuits and its agreement to pay $300,000 in attorneys fees. The next day, a judge dismissed the other one, calling it a strategic lawsuit against public participation, or SLAPP.

If only someone had warned the city that its lawsuits were unconstitutional and doomed to fail. Oh right, we did ([link removed]) , along with plenty of other press freedom ([link removed]) advocates.

We also wrote about a troubling contempt hearing ([link removed]) against Michael Leahy, editor and owner of The Tennessee Star, based on his constitutionally protected publication of excerpts of writings by the shooter behind Nashville’s Covenant School ([link removed]) massacre. Read more on our website ([link removed]) .

What we’re reading

The Gaza Project ([link removed]) (Forbidden Stories). The Gaza Project investigates the Israeli military’s targeting of the press and reveals “a damning array of evidence against the Israeli government.” The Biden administration must condemn ([link removed]) these attacks on press freedom, and call on Israel to immediately stop targeting journalists.

Petition aims to dismiss Atlanta’s bid to use Rico law against ‘Cop City’ activists ([link removed]) (The Guardian). The Georgia deputy attorney general must drop its case against 61 protesters accused of organizing a criminal conspiracy in opposition to the “Cop City” center. This baseless “conspiracy” case puts both journalists and activists at serious risk ([link removed]) .

Racial justice, free speech groups join fight against potential TikTok ban ([link removed].) (The Associated Press). Accompanied by free speech groups, the Electronic Frontier Foundation argued ([link removed]) that the federal TikTok ban is a prior restraint subject to the highest judicial scrutiny. We joined the EFF’s brief because we agree ([link removed]) — the TikTok ban is plainly unconstitutional.

Julian Assange is Free, but Justice Has Not Been Served ([link removed]) (Jacobin). Nearly 15 years into the U.S. government’s prosecutorial saga, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is finally walking free. But it’s not completely a win: His plea deal sends the message that journalists can be punished for simply doing their jobs.

National Press Club, Coalition Letter to President Biden on Alsu Kurmasheva Wrongful Detention Designation ([link removed]) (National Press Club). Alsu Kurmasheva, an American journalist, has been held by Russia for over eight months on baseless charges. Over a dozen press freedom groups called on the Biden administration to immediately designate Kurmasheva as wrongfully detained and do everything possible to ensure her release.
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]

============================================================
Copyright © 2024 Freedom of the Press Foundation, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.

Our mailing address is:
Freedom of the Press Foundation
49 Flatbush Ave, #1017
Brooklyn, NY 11217
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis