From xxxxxx <[email protected]>
Subject The GOP’s Post-Constitutional Future: A New Gilded Age?
Date June 25, 2024 12:05 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
[[link removed]]

THE GOP’S POST-CONSTITUTIONAL FUTURE: A NEW GILDED AGE?  
[[link removed]]


 

Thom Harmann
June 24, 2024
The Hartmann Report
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ A middle class is not a normal thing, and if a country wants one it
must be created by direct government intervention in the
marketplace… _

,

 

As we head toward the presidential debate this week, the
Republicans’ vision for America is becoming clearer by the day.

From Trump to Project 2025 to the speeches of multiple Republican
senators and members of Congress, you’ll frequently hear the phrase
“post-constitutional
[[link removed]]”
applied. They refer to a “post-constitutional moment” and a
Republican “post-constitutional presidency.” But what do they mean
by this?

In the five decades after the Republican Great Depression, Franklin D.
Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower, Jack Kennedy, Lyndon
Johnson, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, and Jimmy Carter taught America
and the world a great truth: a middle class is not a normal thing, and
if a country wants one it must be created by direct government
intervention in the marketplace.

Prior to FDR’s New Deal, America had never had a broad middle class
that encompassed more than half of us. What we today call the middle
class — the ability to raise a family, buy a house and car, take a
vacation, save for old age — was, until the 1940s, typically very
small in the United States, as it was in much of the rest of the
developed world.

AS RECENTLY AS 1900, FOR EXAMPLE, WOMEN COULDN’T VOTE, SENATORS WERE
APPOINTED BY THE WEALTHIEST POWER BROKERS IN THE STATES, AND POVERTY
STALKED AMERICA. THERE WAS NO MINIMUM WAGE; WHEN WORKERS TRIED TO
ORGANIZE UNIONS, POLICE WOULD HELP EMPLOYERS BEAT OR EVEN MURDER THEIR
RINGLEADERS; AND SOCIAL SAFETY NET PROGRAMS LIKE UNEMPLOYMENT
INSURANCE, SOCIAL SECURITY, MEDICARE, FOOD AND HOUSING SUPPORTS, AND
MEDICAID DIDN’T EXIST.

There was no income tax to pay for such programs, and federal receipts
were a mere 3 percent of GDP (today its around 20 percent
[[link removed]]).  As the
President’s Council of Economic Advisors noted
[[link removed]] in
their _2000 Annual Report_:

“To appreciate how far we have come, it is instructive to look back
on what American life was like in 1900. At the turn of the century,
fewer than 10 percent of homes had electricity, and fewer than 2
percent of people had telephones. An automobile was a luxury that only
the very wealthy could afford.

“Many women still sewed their own clothes and gave birth at home.
Because chlorination had not yet been introduced and water filtration
was rare, typhoid fever, spread by contaminated water, was a common
affliction. One in 10 children died in infancy. Average life
expectancy was a mere 47 years.

“Fewer than 14 percent of Americans graduated from high school. ...
Widowhood was far more common than divorce [because of the dire
economic consequences to women of divorce]. The average household had
close to five members, and a fifth of all households had seven or
more. …

“Average income per capita, in 1999 dollars, was about $4,200. …
The typical workweek in manufacturing was about 50 hours, 20 percent
longer than the average today.”

This is the America Republicans want to return us to today. This is
how, they assert, the Constitution wants us to live. The way things
used to be.

IN THE DECADES IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE CIVIL WAR, AMERICAN
GOVERNMENT WAS FUNDAMENTALLY ALTERED. THE PROCESS WAS SPED UP WITH THE
16TH AMENDMENT, AUTHORIZING THE INCOME TAX, AND THE 19TH AMENDMENT
THAT ALLOWED WOMEN TO VOTE. ALONG WITH THE 13TH, 14TH, AND 15TH
AMENDMENTS, THESE CHANGES PROVIDED THE BASIS FOR THE US GOVERNMENT TO
INTERVENE IN THE “FREE MARKET” AND CREATE AMERICA’S FIRST BROAD
MIDDLE CLASS.

FDR imposed a top income tax rate of 90 percent on the morbidly rich,
50% on corporate profits, and passed legislation giving average people
the right to unionize, balancing the power equation between management
and labor.

The result was that by 1980 well over 60 percent of Americans were in
the middle class, the majority with a single household income.

THIS IS THE SERIES OF EVENTS TO WHICH REPUBLICANS OBJECT WHEN THEY SAY
THEY WANT TO EITHER “RETURN AMERICA TO CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES”
OR ENTER INTO A “POST-CONSTITUTIONAL” ERA, DEPENDING ON WHO’S
SPEAKING.

Libertarian billionaires consider any interference in the “magical
free market” to be a violation of some sort of natural law that
creates Dickensian societies with massive concentrations of wealth at
the top, widespread poverty among the working class at the bottom, and
a small middle class made up almost entirely of entrepreneurs and
professional people like doctors and lawyers.

THIS IS WHY REPUBLICAN INTELLECTUALS LIKE FORMER OMB DIRECTOR RUSSELL
VOUGHT, A MAJOR ADVISOR TO TRUMP AND _PROJECT 2025_, ARE, AS HEATHER
COX RICHARDSON NOTED IN HER BRILLIANT SUBSTACK NEWSLETTER
[[link removed]]:

“[C]ALLING FOR DRACONIAN CUTS TO GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, STUDENT LOANS,
AND HOUSING, HEALTH CARE, AND FOOD ASSISTANCE. [VOUGHT] CALLED FOR $2
TRILLION IN CUTS TO MEDICAID OVER TEN YEARS, MORE THAN $600 BILLION IN
CUTS TO THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, MORE THAN $400 BILLION IN CUTS TO
FOOD ASSISTANCE, AND SO ON.”

Its why Republicans are working so hard to disempower women in the
workplace, starting with eliminating their control over their own
reproductive capacity (which is what drove the women’s liberation
movement of the 1970s post-_Roe v Wade_).

It’s also why they’re doing everything they can to shut down
corporate Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs nationwide;
the majority of the hiring and increased pay benefits coming from
corporate, government, and academic DEI programs go to women
[[link removed]],
a situation Republican men find intolerable.

REPUBLICANS WANT TO EITHER “RETURN” TO A PRE-CIVIL WAR
UNDERSTANDING OF THE CONSTITUTION (AS ADVOCATED BY CLARENCE THOMAS AND
SAM ALITO) OR A “POST-CONSTITUTIONAL” ORDER IN WHICH THE LAST
CENTURY’S “INNOVATIONS” (INCLUDING THE INCOME TAX, WOMEN’S
SUFFRAGE, “WELFARE” PROGRAMS, ENTITLEMENTS, AND EVEN FREE PUBLIC
SCHOOL AND COLLEGE) ARE ENDED.

We see this in the ways Republicans on the Supreme Court have gutted
both the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965,
how they’ve stripped most of the teeth out of the 1935 National
Labor Relations Act, and how they’re working to castrate most
regulatory agencies including the EPA, FTC, and even the IRS.

Some of it is simple greed: as the middle class shrinks and poverty
grows, the cash stash at the very top of the American economic pyramid
grows exponentially. Other American oligarchs follow the teachings
of Russell Kirk
[[link removed]],
William F. Buckley, and Ronald Reagan who all argued that a
larger-than-50% middle class is a threat to the stability
[[link removed]] of
the nation.

WHEN THE 1960S HAPPENED AND WORKERS, WOMEN, DRAFT-AGE YOUNG MEN,
BLACKS, HISPANICS, AND GAYS WERE ALL SIMULTANEOUSLY DEMANDING EQUAL
RIGHTS AND PROTECTION FROM EXPLOITATION, CONSERVATIVES IN THE GOP
BELIEVED THEY WERE SEEING THE ACTUAL, DISASTROUS UNRAVELING OF
AMERICA.

They argued that transferring even part of the wealth of rich people
to help build a middle class is the first step in a socialist agenda
that must ultimately end with torches, pitchforks, and rich people
facing the guillotine in a full-blown communist takeover of America.

As Richardson notes
[[link removed]]:

“Vought argues that the United States is in a ‘post constitutional
moment’ that ‘pays only lip service to the old Constitution.’ He
attributes that crisis to ‘the Left,’ which he says ‘quietly
adopted a strategy of institutional change,’ by which he appears to
mean the growth of the federal government to protect individual
Americans. He attributes that change to the presidency of President
Woodrow Wilson beginning in 1913. Vought calls for what he calls
‘Radical Constitutionalism’ to destroy the power of the modern
administrative state and instead elevate the president to supreme
authority.”

THESE ARE THE REAL STAKES IN THIS FALL’S ELECTION:

— Democratic President Joe Biden believes that government
intervening in the marketplace to build and sustain a broad and
diverse middle class is good for all Americans. He holds up the
success of the New Deal and the Great Society as exemplars,
justification for programs holding corporate America to account and
empowering women, minorities, and workers generally.

— Republican Donald Trump and his fellow billionaires in the GOP
believe the middle class is still too large at today’s 49 percent
[[link removed]] and
needs to be cut further down to size to take America back to the
pre-1913 “constitutional” era when there was no income tax; women
couldn’t vote, work, or have a checking account; there was no
minimum wage or unemployment insurance; no Social Security, Medicare,
or Medicaid; and police routinely collaborated with employers to
murder union organizers.

Republicans are dead serious about this. Your vote, and those of your
friends and acquaintances, will determine which of these two dueling
narratives about the future of the American middle class will win.

Choose wisely.

_Thom Hartmann is a NY Times bestselling author of 34 books in 17
languages & nation's #1 progressive radio host. Psychotherapist,
international relief worker. Politics, history, spirituality,
psychology, science, anthropology, pre-history, culture, and the
natural world._

* middle class
[[link removed]]
* GOP government
[[link removed]]
* Constitutional Crisis
[[link removed]]
* poverty
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]
Manage subscription
[[link removed]]
Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Portside
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United States
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • L-Soft LISTSERV