From David Dayen, The American Prospect <[email protected]>
Subject Dayen on TAP: Boeing Will Either Face or Not Face Accountability
Date June 24, 2024 7:03 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
The Latest from the Prospect ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

??

View this email in your browser [link removed]

**JUNE 24, 2024**

On the Prospect website

We Can and Should Address Racial Disparities [link removed]
Most of the programs that would be most beneficial to racial equality are actually universal policies. BY LAWRENCE MISHEL

You Don't Need a Shrink to Tell You Why You Feel This Way [link removed]
Really anxious about this week's Biden-Trump debate? So is everybody else. BY HAROLD MEYERSON

A Small-Town Texas Librarian's Big Stand Against Book Bans [link removed]
In Llano County, a local librarian fought back against censorship, prompting a federal court fight and national recognition but losing the job of her dreams. BY LISE OLSEN

Dayen on TAP

****

****

****

****

****

****

****

**** Boeing Will Either Face or Not Face Accountability

Differing news accounts of a major decision to prosecute Boeing for violating a 2021 settlement highlight the policy and political implications.

Boeing either may or may not be prosecuted for violating the terms of a settlement agreement in 2021 involving its 737 MAX planes. That's my informed perspective after reading elite media reports.

If you read The New York Times [link removed], you'd learn that the Justice Department is "considering" another deferred prosecution agreement to replace the last deferred prosecution agreement. It could install a federal monitor to oversee Boeing's manufacturing processes, but it would sidestep a lawsuit as "too legally risky." If you read Reuters [link removed], you'd learn that actually, prosecutors working on the case have recommended criminal charges to senior Justice Department leadership.

These can both be correct. The prosecutors could recommend criminal prosecution for violating the settlement agreement-after all, that's the by-the-book response to such a violation-while the leadership could decline the recommendation and instead move to a settlement again.

The initial DPA, signed the day before the January 6th attack on the Capitol in the waning days of Donald Trump's first term, gave Boeing a reprieve for misleading regulators about fatal errors in the 737 MAX systems, which led to two crashes in 2018 and 2019 that killed 346 passengers.

Just last week, Boeing CEO Dave Calhoun received a chilly reception on Capitol Hill, from a Senate committee and families of those who died in the crashes, who demanded [link removed] that DOJ pursue the maximum criminal fine of $24 billion for "the deadliest corporate crime in U.S. history," as well as jail terms for top executives, including former CEO Dennis Muilenburg. But the

**Times** has information on a meeting between the families and DOJ, where top leadership prepared them for the lack of a prosecution, claiming they wouldn't be able to win a guilty verdict.

The Justice Department has a July 7 deadline to decide what sanction-another settlement or criminal prosecution-to place on Boeing for violating the settlement, which it already determined in May.

[link removed]

Though the Justice Department has engaged in several broad swipes at corporate power under Biden, practically all of them have come from the Antitrust Division. The Criminal Division has been far less active on corporate crime. In April, I wrote [link removed] that Biden's DOJ engaged in fewer corporate criminal prosecutions in its biggest year than in any year under George W. Bush. More than three-quarters of the corporations that DOJ prosecuted in 2023 had 50 employees or fewer; large corporations like Boeing simply are not well represented among corporate criminal actors in the Biden administration.

DOJ's top brass-Attorney General Merrick Garland and his top deputy Lisa Monaco-simply haven't proven that they have the stomach for challenging large companies that engage in serial violations of the law. The specter of the Arthur Andersen case, where the accounting firm was convicted of shredding documents about failed energy giant Enron in 2001 and subsequently went out of business, looms large in the minds of way too many cautious prosecutors. (The accounting industry is just as big today as it was with Arthur Andersen; fake outrage about job loss has been totally misplaced.)

With Boeing, the only major commercial aviation company in the U.S., the "too big to fail" problem is even more prominent. A criminal conviction would prevent Boeing from securing government contracts, and Defense Department funding keeps the company alive. But Boeing's spiraling dysfunction in engineering is simply unlikely to improve if it can skate away from accountability through multiple administrations, whether Democratic or Republican. At some point, the law has to mean something, regardless of the criminal offender.

There's a political dimension to this as well. Donald Trump's DOJ let Boeing walk. Joe Biden's DOJ has an opportunity to show that no corporation, along with no man, is above the law.

~ DAVID DAYEN

**Follow David Dayen on Twitter** [link removed] [link removed]

or Bluesky Social [link removed]

[link removed]

To receive this newsletter directly in your inbox, click here to subscribe.?? [link removed]

Click to Share this Newsletter

[link removed]

??

[link removed]

??

[link removed]

??

[link removed]

??

[link removed]

YOUR TAX DEDUCTIBLE DONATION SUPPORTS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM [link removed]

The American Prospect, Inc., 1225 I Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC xxxxxx, United States
Copyright (c) 2024 The American Prospect. All rights reserved.

To opt out of American Prospect membership messaging, click here [link removed].

To manage your newsletter preferences, click here [link removed].

To unsubscribe from all American Prospect emails, including newsletters, click here [link removed].
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis