The Pitfalls of Crisis Pregnancy Center Signage Laws
View this email in your browser ([link removed])
** CfA's June 21, 2024 Newsletter
------------------------------------------------------------
With your support, Campaign for Accountability is working to expose corruption and hold the powerful accountable.
** This Week's Updates:
------------------------------------------------------------
Jim Jordan Claims YouTube is “Censoring” Gun Influencers
This week, House Judiciary Committee Chair Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) sent a letter ([link removed]) to a law firm representing Alphabet, demanding that the company turn over communications concerning its decision to age-restrict certain types of firearm content on YouTube. The policy in question ([link removed]'t%20allow,appropriate%20for%20viewers%20under%2018.) went into effect earlier this week, and simply requires users to create an account before watching videos featuring 3D-printed guns, automatic weapons, or automatic weapon conversion accessories. Videos featuring semi-automatic weapons, like unmodified pistols or hunting rifles, would not be affected by the policy.
While YouTube never announced a reason for this policy change, the company has faced criticism ([link removed]) for its treatment of firearm content. In 2023, CfA’s Tech Transparency Project (TTP) reported ([link removed]) that YouTube was recommending firearm videos to children interested in video games, creating a pipeline to increasingly extreme content through its algorithms. The office of New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg eventually cited this research in a letter ([link removed]) to YouTube, asking it to enforce its existing policies against videos showing users how to create weapons – including 3D-printed guns. His office also urged YouTube to stop recommending videos featuring firearms and other violent content
to children. Now, Jordan is characterizing YouTube’s age-restrictions as “censorship,” despite the fact that users can still view this content by creating a YouTube account and confirming that they are 18 or older. As of this morning, a quick search ([link removed]) reveals that YouTube is still failing to completely enforce the policy.
Delaware Lawmakers Pass Crisis Pregnancy Center Transparency Bill
This week, the Delaware Senate passed a bill ([link removed]) that would designate anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) as “limited services medical facilities,” to make it clear that these unlicensed and unregulated non-profits are not held to the same standards as actual care providers. Most importantly, CPCs would have to display signs informing consumers that they are not licensed as medical facilities and have no licensed provider on staff. The Baltimore City Council enacted a similar law in 2009, which was ultimately overturned ([link removed]) because it compelled CPCs to display information about abortion access. Laws that force CPCs to share information about medical licensing have been more successful
([link removed]) ; in New York City, CPCs must ([link removed]) disclose that they do not provide abortion care or have medical providers on site; actual enforcement of the law is scarce ([link removed]) , however. Now, Delaware may be able to build on New York City’s efforts and advance its disclosure bill, finding the elusive margin when corporate free speech ends and consumer protection begins.
In April, CfA sent complaints ([link removed]) to the attorneys general of Idaho, Minnesota, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Washington alleging that CPCs in their states had potentially violated consumer protection laws by telling clients their personal health information was protected under HIPAA. In practice, most CPCs do not bill for their services (which would force them to comply with HIPAA) or operate like real medical facilities.
Republican Lawmakers Push Untested IVF “Alternative”
This week, a coalition of Republican lawmakers introduced a bill called the Reproductive Empowerment and Support through Optimal Restoration (RESTORE ([link removed]) ) Act, which directs funding to an unproved field of science known as “restorative reproductive medicine” (RRM). As Mother Jones reported ([link removed]) this week, RRM was developed by a group of religious medical practitioners seeking an “alternative” to IVF, which the Catholic Church has opposed ([link removed].) since the 1980s. Unlike in-vitro fertilization (IVF), RRM is supported by almost no medical evidence, and is only practiced by a small circle of physicians.
Republican lawmakers have repeatedly ([link removed]) claimed that IVF access is not under threat, despite an Alabama Supreme Court ruling that temporarily halted ([link removed]) procedures in the state and an uptick in “embryonic personhood ([link removed]) ” bills that could criminalize the disposal of IVF-created embryos. The Southern Baptist Convention, which boasts nearly 13 million members, also voted ([link removed]) to oppose the use of IVF at its annual meeting last week. When given an opportunity to codify protection for IVF into law, Senate Republicans blocked ([link removed]) the bill, and held up
([link removed]) the RESTORE Act as an alternative.
What We're Reading
Abortion is becoming more common in primary care clinics as doctors challenge stigma ([link removed])
IRS says ‘vast majority’ of 1 million pandemic-era credit claims show a risk of being improper ([link removed])
FTC refers TikTok complaint to Justice Department ([link removed])
** Follow Our Work:
------------------------------------------------------------
We thank you for your continued support. Without people like you, our work would not be possible.
Here is how you can stay involved and help us accomplish our mission:
1. Follow CfA on Threads ([link removed]) and BlueSky ([link removed])
2. Follow the Tech Transparency Project on Threads ([link removed]) and Bluesky ([link removed])
3. Tell your friends and colleagues ([link removed]) about CfA.
4. Send us a tip ([link removed]) .
5. Make a tax-deductible donation ([link removed]) .
Be on the lookout for more updates about our work in the upcoming weeks. Thanks again for signing up to be a part of CfA!
Sincerely,
Michelle Kuppersmith
Executive Director, Campaign for Accountability
============================================================
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2024 Campaign for Accountability, All rights reserved.
You signed up for this list at campaignforaccountability.org
Our mailing address is:
Campaign for Accountability
611 Pennsylvania Ave SE
#337
Washington, District Of Columbia 20003
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
