Hunter Biden Verdict Update!
|
Hunter Verdict Update
The Bidens are going down in the history books with the inaugural felony
conviction of a First Family member. Unlike former President Trump, Hunter
Biden received a fair trial. This guilty verdict is an important first step
toward accountability for Biden family corruption.
The public would do well to remember that the Justice Department was
dragged, kicking and screaming into this prosecution of Hunter. Our
successful Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) litigation, exposing federal
special protection and the cover-up of Hunter Biden’s gun scandal, shows
how this case could have been brought years ago.
We’ve been at the forefront of pressuring the federal government to come
clean about its role in protecting Hunter Biden.
We sued the FBI for records regarding the gun owned by Hunter Biden that
reportedly was thrown in a trash can behind a Delaware grocery store. In
a
joint
status report to the court, the FBI stated it would not produce
records about the incident due to an “ongoing criminal
investigation.”
In February 2023, from a separate lawsuit, we
released
records from the United States Secret Service that implicated
the FBI in the unusual action of helping Hunter Biden.
In response to a February 24, 2021, email
inquiry from Politico reporter Ben Schreckinger regarding the Secret
Service’s involvement in the investigation of the Hunter Biden gun
incident, the Communications Department asks for “more information or
documentation.” Schreckinger responds: “Sure thing.
Agents visited StarQuest Shooters & Survival Supply and asked to take
possession of the paperwork Hunter had filled out to purchase a gun there.
The FBI also had some involvement in the investigation.”
In October 2020, The Blaze reported
that in October 2018, Hunter Biden’s handgun was taken by Hallie Biden,
the widow of then-presidential nominee Joe Biden’s son Beau. In 2021,
Politico reported:
Hallie took Hunter’s gun and threw it in a trash can behind a grocery
store, only to return later to find it gone.
Delaware police began investigating,
concerned that the trash can was across from a high school and that the
missing gun could be used in a crime, according to law enforcement
officials and a copy of the police report obtained by POLITICO.
But a curious thing happened at the time:
Secret Service agents approached the owner of the store where Hunter bought
the gun and asked to take the paperwork involving the sale, according to
two people, one of whom has firsthand knowledge of the episode and the
other was briefed by a Secret Service agent after the fact.
We have several FOIA lawsuits and information requests focused on Biden
family corruption.
We are
suing
the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) for all agency records relating to
the Department of Justice or Internal Revenue Service (IRS) investigations
of Hunter Biden and all records relating to efforts to interview lawyer
Patrick Kevin Morris regarding Hunter Biden.
In June 2023, we
sued
the CIA for all communications of the spy agency’s Prepublication
Classification Review Board (PCRB) regarding an October 19, 2020, email
request to review and “clear” a letter signed by 51 former intelligence
community officials characterizing the Hunter Biden laptop story as having
“all the earmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign.”
In July 2023, we
sued
the DOJ for records from the Office of the Attorney General and Office of
the Deputy Attorney General regarding the Internal Revenue Service
investigation of Hunter Biden.
In June 2023, we filed a
lawsuit
against the Department of Justice for a copy of the FBI FD-1023 form that
describes “an alleged criminal scheme involving then-Vice President Biden
and a foreign national relating to the exchange of money for policy
decisions.” Judicial Watch also asked for communications about the
FD-1023.
In May 2023, we filed a FOIA
lawsuit
against the National Archives for Biden family records and communications
regarding travel and finance transactions, as well as communications
between the Bidens and several known business associates.
On October 14, 2022, we
sued
the DOJ for all records in the possession of FBI Supervisory Intelligence
Analyst Brian Auten regarding an August 6, 2020, briefing provided to
members of the U.S. Senate. Ron Johnson (R-WI) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA)
raised concerns that the briefing was intended to undermine the senators’
investigation of Hunter Biden.
We filed a lawsuit against the U.S. State Department on April 20, 2022, for
messages sent through the
SMART
(State Messaging and Archive Retrieval Toolkit) system that mention Hunter
Biden.
In December 2020, State Department
records
obtained through a Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit showed that former U.S.
Ambassador to Ukraine Marie “Masha” Yovanovitch had specifically warned
in 2017 about corruption allegations against Burisma Holdings.
In October 2020, we forced the release of State Department
records
that included a briefing checklist of a February 22, 2019, meeting in Kyiv
between then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch and Sally
Painter, co-founder and chief operating officer of Blue Star Strategies, a
Democratic lobbying firm which was hired by Burisma Holdings to combat
corruption allegations. At the time of the meeting, Hunter Biden was
serving on the board of directors for Burisma Holdings.
Records Detail Disturbing Biden Dog Attacks on Secret Service
Personnel
Joe and Jill Biden let their dogs attack dozens of Secret Service and White
House personnel.
Judicial Watch just received
116
pages of records from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) that reveal the details about
several incidents in which Secret Service personnel were bitten, sometimes
requiring medical attention.
The records come in response to a February 2024
lawsuit
we filed after the DHS failed to respond to a September 27, 2023, FOIA
request (Judicial
Watch v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (No.
1:24-cv-00429)). We asked for:
Any and all records related to incidents of aggression and bites
involving the Biden family dog, “Commander”, including but not limited
to communications sent to and from USSS officials in the Uniformed and
Non-Uniformed Divisions involved in White House operations and the
Presidential Protection Division.
The records include a September 12, 2023,
email
between Secret Service officials stating:
POTUS took Commander (on a leash) to the Kennedy Garden this evening for
a walk. While POTUS and Commander were in the Kennedy Garden I was standing
half way from the Book-Sellers and the Family Theater. POTUS opened the
Book-Seller door and said [redacted]. As I started to walk toward him to
see if he needed help, Commander ran through his legs and bit my left arm
through the front of my jacket. I pulled my arm away and yelled no. POTUS
also yelled [redacted] to Commander. POTUS then [redacted]. I obliged and
Commander let me pet him. When turning to close the door, Commander jumped
again and bit my left arm for the second time. POTUS again yelled at
Commander and attached the leash to him. My suit coat has 3 holes,1 being
all the way through. No skin was broken.
On September 14, 2023, an agent in the Presidential Protective Detail,
whose name is redacted, using the subject line “5/12/2021” sent
an
email to a colleague with several attachments, including photos
of suits, repair estimates and a “Damage to Personal Property” form
indicating that a dog biting incident had occurred on May 12, 2021. In the
claim form, the agent asks for $943 for a new suit, because: “Through no
fault or negligence of my own, the coat was torn by a dog bite.”
On September 25, 2023, a sergeant in the Uniformed Division emails a
colleague that Commander bit an agent that day.
You currently have [redacted] and [redacted] available after 2055
hours.
FYI – there was a dog bite and the Officer
may need to go the hospital.
[Redacted] is covering for [redacted] who
was at [redacted].
Have a safe shift!
A Secret Service log the same day
reported
that at 8:06 p.m. on September 25, 2023:
OFC. [redacted] (POST [redacted] ADVISED BIT BY FAMILY PET AND REQUESTED
SECTOR OFFICIAL.
SGT. [redacted] REQUESTED EMT TO
RESPOND.
At 8:08 p.m. the log notes:
OFC. [redacted] [redacted] ADVISED WHITE HOUSE MEDICAL HELD POST
[redacted].
OFC. [redacted] [redacted] ADVISED FAMILY
PET 2nd FLOOR RESIDENCE.”
The last entry in the log indicates “[8:58 p.m.] – CAPT. [redacted]
REQUEST JOC [Joint Operations Center] LOG TO BE DELETED.”
The next day, CNN reporter Betsy Klein
emails
the Secret Service asking, “if you are able to confirm that a uniformed
female USSS officer was hospitalized for a biting incident with Commander
Biden last night.”
Anthony Guglielmi, chief of communications, replies:
Yesterday around 8pm, a Secret Service Uniformed Division police officer
came in contact with a First Family pet and was bitten. The officer was
treated by medical personnel on complex and I am not aware of any
hospitalization.
The CNN report produced
multiple
queries from various media outlets. Guglielmi sent the same
response to each.
A September 27, 2023,
email
from a Secret Service worker’s compensation official in the Safety,
Health & Environmental Division writes to several colleagues: “Heads up
and FYI. TMZ just reported a dog bite at the White House! Can we please
find a way to get this dog muzzled.”
A colleague asks, “How does TMZ know before we do???” An official in
the same division responds “Not sure. We must get this dog muzzled.”
Another replies, “Geezzzz…” Another adds, “Unbelievable!”
Two days earlier
an
article was published, which notes (referencing Judicial Watch
disclosures) “President Biden's Dog Commander Allegedly Bit 7
People.”
These documents show Joe Biden is personally responsible for attacks by his
dog Commander on Secret Service personnel. No wonder the Biden White House
forced us to go to federal court for these records.
Our FOIA
requests
and lawsuits exposed initial White House falsehoods about the
severity and number of attacks by the Bidens’ previous dog, Major. We
then received a tip that Commander was also
attacking
Secret Service personnel and uncovered documents last July showing 10
biting incidents.
According to a Judicial Watch source, President Biden mistreated his dogs.
The source disclosed Biden punched and kicked his dogs.
In February 2024 we
received
269 pages of records related to incidents of aggression by Commander,
including at least 23 biting incidents. After one incident, East Wing
public tours were stopped for approximately 20 minutes due to the blood on
the floor. These records include a
spreadsheet
of 22 incident reports between October 2022 and June 2023, 10 of which
required medical treatment.
On May 14, 2024, we filed a separate
lawsuit
after the Department of Homeland Security failed to respond to a February
28, 2024, FOIA request (Judicial
Watch v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (No.
1:24-cv-01397)). Judicial Watch is asking for:
All emails and text messages sent to and from the following officials
regarding the submission of CA-1 Forms ("Notice of Traumatic Injury and
Claim for Continuation of Pay or Compensation") in connection with bites by
Biden family dogs: Director Kimberly Cheatle, Deputy Dir. Ronald Rowe,
Chief Operating Officer Cynthia Radway, Asst. Dir. Michael Plati, Asst.
Dir. Brian Lambert, Chief Human Capital Officer Denise Walker Hall, Asst.
Dir. David Smith, Asst. Dir. Miltom Wilson, Uniformed Division Chief
Michael Buck, Chief Counsel Thomas Huse, and Chief of Communications
Anthony Guglielmi.
Hearing Held on Reopening Lawsuit for President Biden’s Senate
Records
We were in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware this week for
a
hearing on our petition to reopen our case for the release of
Joe Biden’s Senate records kept at the University of Delaware. We have
powerful evidence that the courts were misled about the Biden papers.
Judicial Watch and the Daily Caller News Foundation asked the court to
reopen the case in light of the findings of Special Counsel Robert Hur that
contradict representations made under oath by representatives of the
University of Delaware that no consideration was paid to Biden in
connection with his gift of his Senate records.
In July 2020, we filed the FOIA
lawsuit
for the records, which are housed at the university’s library (Judicial
Watch Inc. and The Daily Caller News Foundation v. DE Department of Justice
and University of Delaware (No. N20A-07-001 CEB)).
In July 2023 the Delaware Supreme Court
sided
with the university, denying the release of the records because the
university stated to the courts that no tax dollars were used to manage
them.
On February 5, 2024, Hur
released
his report on the scandal. It calls into question the representations by
the university that no state tax dollars were used to manage the papers,
which Hur also found to have contained unlawfully retained classified
information.
In its petition to reopen the case, we argue:
The [university’s affidavit] provides, in relevant part, that no
consideration was paid to President Biden, “State funded or otherwise,”
in connection with the Senatorial Papers. To the contrary, the Special
Counsel Report found that “Mr. Biden asked two of his former longtime
Senate staffers to review his boxes in courtesy storage,” and that
“[t]he staffers were paid by the University of Delaware to perform the
pre-gift review….”
“The Hur report revelations are absolutely stunning,” said Michael
Bastasch, editor-in-chief for the Daily Caller News Foundation. “The
University of Delaware has some serious explaining to do.”
At the hearing’s conclusion, the judge said he would rule “relatively
soon.”
Jack Smith’s Questionable Past
Anti-Trump prosecutor Jack Smith has an interesting and troubling
professional background. Micah Morrison, our chief investigative reporter,
looks
back in Investigative Bulletin.
The International Criminal Court at the Hague was back in the news
recently with the announcement
by its chief prosecutor that he would seek charges against Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for war
crimes in Gaza, while simultaneously seeking charges against the leaders of
Hamas for war crimes in Israel. This obscene
act of moral equivalency tells you all you need to know about the ICC.
It’s also a reminder that the most powerful prosecutor at work in the
U.S. today, Special Counsel Jack Smith, has significant connections to the
controversial court and another Hague tribunal.
From 2008 to 2010, Smith was the
Investigative Coordinator for the Office of the Prosecutor of the ICC—the
same office that today is seeking arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant
from a three-judge ICC panel. Founded in 2002 to pursue war crimes, the ICC
has been viewed with skepticism by, among others, the U.S., Israel, Russia,
China, and many African nations. In 2018, then-National Security Adviser
John Bolton castigated the ICC for its failure to “deter and punish
atrocity crimes” and its “threat to American sovereignty.” Last
week, reacting to news of the Netanyahu arrest warrant, the House voted to
sanction the
ICC.
ICC records
indicate that during and shortly after Smith’s tenure at the
organization, it brought cases against high-ranking figures in the Congo,
Sudan, Kenya, the Ivory Coast, and Libya. None appear to have resulted in
convictions.
But back at Main Justice, Obama
Administration figures were impressed. In 2010, Smith was plucked to head
the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section—a big promotion for a
relatively untested young prosecutor. He served until 2015, supervising
cases against former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, New York power broker
Sheldon Silver, former Congressman Rick Renzi, and CIA operative Jeffery
Sterling, among others.
In 2014, Smith was eyed by Congressional
investigators examining IRS targeting of conservative groups. Smith
testified that following a meeting with IRS official Lois Lerner, his
office “had a dialogue” with the FBI about opening investigations into
conservative groups, according to a copy of the interview obtained by CNN.
Smith said the conversations did not lead to investigations. It does not
appear that the Smith work product from the House probe—interview
transcripts, investigator notes, memos—was ever made public. Read more
about Judicial Watch’s investigation of the IRS affair here.
By 2018, Smith was back at the Hague, this
time as chief prosecutor for the Kosovo Specialist Chambers, another
highly unusual judicial body, formed to
prosecute war crimes committed during the 1998-2000 Kosovo War. In 2020,
Smith indicted the former president of Kosovo, Hasim Thaci, for war crimes
committed in 1998 and 1999. Thaci was extradited to the Hague and his trial
is currently underway.
In 2022, Attorney General Merrick Garland
brought Smith back to the U.S. to take over the investigation of former
president Donald Trump. The rest is history. Two indictments of Trump
quickly followed, along with rising public concern about Smith’s
targeting of the frontrunner for the GOP presidential nomination.
Judicial Watch has launched several
investigations of Smith. We’re closely tracking developments at the Hague
for what they might reveal about Smith’s prosecutorial conduct. We sued
the Justice Department after it denied our FOIA request for the names of
senior staff working for Smith; Justice responded by asking a federal court to keep those names
secret. We also sued for records and
communications between Smith and state prosecutors in the separate
Georgia investigation of Trump. To date, in that case, the Justice Department
has refused to confirm or deny the existence of records, claiming that to
do so would interfere with law enforcement proceedings. We’ll continue
pressing forward on all fronts.
Financial Impact of Illegals on Public Education System Is
‘Staggering’
You can’t throw open the border to millions of people without
consequences. One big cost for taxpayers and our children is in our
schools, as our Corruption Chronicles blog shows.
Nearly half a million illegal immigrant minors have entered the United
States through the porous Mexican border since President Joe Biden took
office in 2021 and the financial impact on the nation’s public education
system is staggering, according to information disclosed at a recent
congressional hearing conducted to address the unprecedented crisis.
“Educating illegal immigrant children
requires substantial resources, altering the learning environment for all
students,” said Florida Congressman Aaron Bean, who chairs a subcommittee
on early childhood, elementary and secondary education for the House
Education and Workforce Committee. “Overcrowded classrooms, the need for
new facilities, and strained student-to-teacher ratios are just some of the
challenges,” Bean added, offering that in just four states—California,
New York, Texas, and Arizona—the cost of integrating illegal immigrant
children into public schools reached nearly three-quarters of a billion
dollars in one fiscal year. “If we assume that every illegal immigrant
child encountered by border patrol enters the school system, the cost
nationwide would be over two billion dollars annually,” said the lawmaker
who conducted the recent hearing, titled “The Consequences of Biden’s Border Chaos for
K-12 Schools."
Public schools are often the first to feel
the impact of open border policies, according to testimony delivered at the
hearing. That is partly because in 1982 the Supreme Court prohibited states
from denying illegal immigrant children a public-school education. Since
the ruling was issued, tens of millions of illegal aliens have entered the
U.S. through the southern border with a substantial chunk enrolling in
public schools across the country. Some come with family and others come
without a guardian, which the government classifies as Unaccompanied Alien
Children (UAC). Besides providing them with a free taxpayer-funded
education, Uncle Sam also spends billions of dollars annually to house,
medically treat and entertain UAC. Last year the Biden administration
quietly doled out tens of millions of dollars for the long-term foster care of UAC to further
assist migrants under the age of 17, including pregnant and parenting teens
and those who are especially vulnerable or with other special
needs.
The impact on public education is just a
snippet of the problem. Several examples were offered at the recent
congressional hearing. In New York students were switched to online
learning because nearly 2,000 illegal immigrants were sheltered in a school
gymnasium. In Austin, Texas teachers had to conduct classes in hallways and
conference rooms to accommodate over 400 newly enrolled illegal immigrant
children. In Denver, Colorado an influx of over 40,000 illegal immigrants
forced the state to spend an extra $24 million to cover the cost. In
Chicago the mayor says the city’s resources are “tapped out,” and a
local teacher reveals that over 40% of students qualify for English learner
services and the numbers keep growing. In Massachusetts public schools have
absorbed 2,000 new illegal immigrant students, forcing districts to find
emergency housing with little notice. In New Mexico there have been
incidents of adult-age illegal immigrants hiding in a middle school to
avoid apprehension from Border Patrol, which led to the arrest of six
illegal immigrants and prompted temporary lockdowns.
Last year a congressional report that
revealed the cost of illegal immigration is greater than the annual gross domestic product of
15 states disclosed that
nearly four million illegal aliens attend public schools around that
country and most receive special services for Limited English Proficiency
(LEP) costing American taxpayers nearly $59 billion. New York City alone is
spending around $440 million to educate about 11,500 illegal aliens who
will likely remain in the system for years to come. Laughably, at last
week’s K-12 congressional hearing only one witness—from the National
Council of La Raza—testified that the nation’s education system
actually benefits from the influx of illegal immigrants. Her name is Amalia
Chamorro, education policy director at the leftist nonprofit. “In our
nation’s schools, immigrant students are a significant asset in their
classrooms,” Chamorro testified. “They are known for their resilience,
grit, and problem-solving skills, which are critical for 21st -century
learning. In fact, research shows that immigrant students have such a high
level of motivation to succeed and learn, they contribute to positive
classroom environments that benefit all students.”
Until next week,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|