[link removed]

FAIR
View article on FAIR's website ([link removed])
Kristof’s Burden: Global Journalist Supports Closed Borders Ari Paul ([link removed])


Election Focus 2024 Nicholas Kristof is that guy at the party who reminds you that you haven’t really lived. While you maintain a regular, nine-to-five existence, driving from Point A to Point B, the world has been Kristof’s oyster. With a fully stamped passport, the New York Times columnist can embarrass everyone with his tales from Africa and Asia, marking himself as a true global citizen who yearns for adventure.

Worse, he mobilizes exotic datelines as trump cards to back up his neoliberalism disguised as forward-thinking progressivism: Teachers unions are bad for kids (9/12/12 ([link removed]) ), sweatshops are good for workers (1/14/09 ([link removed]) ) and US imperialism can be a positive force (2/1/02 ([link removed]) ). You, the provincial rube, simply can’t rebut him. “Oh, have you been to Cambodia? No? Well I have.”

Here at FAIR (11/4/21 ([link removed]) ), we were relieved when he announced his resignation from the Times to run for governor of Oregon, taking his vacuous moralism and smug place-dropping to the campaign trail. Upon his disqualification from the election (OPB, 2/18/22 ([link removed]) ), he returned to his coveted perch like he never left at all.


** 'BS border move'
------------------------------------------------------------
NYT: Why Biden Is Right to Curb Immigration

Nicholas Kristof (New York Times, 6/8/24 ([link removed]) ) makes the liberal case for immigration restriction: "It’s better that the ladder be raised in an orderly way by reasonable people."

Recently, he has jumped in (6/8/24 ([link removed]) ) to defend President Joe Biden’s reactionary move to shut down the border and end asylum on a rolling basis.

The Biden order “would bar migrants from being granted asylum when US officials deem that the southern border is overwhelmed” (AP, 6/5/24 ([link removed]) ), a move many immigration advocates have branded as a capitulation to the xenophobic right (Reason, 6/4/24 ([link removed]) ; Al Jazeera, 6/6/24 ([link removed]) ) in his tough reelection campaign against former President Donald Trump (CBS, 6/9/24 ([link removed]) ).

Conservative media weren’t buying it, however. The Wall Street Journal editorial board (6/4/24 ([link removed]) ) said that the move “might help reduce the flow somewhat if they are strictly enforced, and at least he’s admitting the problem,” but worried that migrants “could still seek asylum at ports of entry using the CBP One mobile app, which would be excluded from the daily triggers.” The National Review (6/5/24 ([link removed]) ) called it “too little, too late” for conservatives. The New York Post editorial board (6/9/24 ([link removed]) ) said the president’s “BS border move has already failed.”

Kristof’s column, by contrast, serves as liberal media support for a policy that is cruel, hypocritical and a further indication that Biden’s only election tactic is to outflank Trump from the right. It is important to see how Kristof, and the Times, wield cosmopolitan journalistic instincts to defend closed borders, xenophobia and outright misinformation that serves the right.


** 'Swing the doors open'
------------------------------------------------------------
LA Times: Asylum seekers face decision to split up families or wait indefinitely under new border policy

Kristof saying that the US has "lax immigration policies" with a "loophole that allowed people to stay indefinitely" is a cruel misrepresentation of Biden's border policy (LA Times, 2/24/23 ([link removed]) ).

To start off, Kristof said the current code is flawed because of “a loophole that allowed people to claim asylum and stay indefinitely whether or not they warranted it.” This is a talking point made by anti-immigrant and right-wing groups ([link removed]) , and claiming that this is a “loophole” implies that there is a flaw in the system that allows criminals to wiggle out of the law.

In fact, it is legal ([link removed]) to come to the country to seek asylum. And the system is far less rosy for refugees than anti-immigrant activists—and now Kristof—portray it. Asylum-seeking families are often separated (LA Times, 2/24/23 ([link removed]) ). And while seeking asylum is a guaranteed right ([link removed]) under US and international law, the federal government has “severely restricted access to asylum at the border since 2016” according to the International Rescue Committee (7/1/22 ([link removed]) ). The group explained:

A policy called the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) or “Remain in Mexico” forced certain asylum seekers to wait out their US immigration court cases in Mexico with little or no access to legal counsel. Although a federal court blocked the Biden administration’s attempts to end this program, the Supreme Court later ruled in the administration’s favor. For over three years, MPP impacted more than 75,000 asylum seekers, requiring them to wait out their US court hearings in Mexico—mostly in northern border towns. There they faced the often impossible expectations to gather evidence and prepare for a trial conducted in English while struggling to keep their families safe.

Kristof acknowledged that he, as a white man, is an American because his Eastern European father ([link removed]) was allowed into the country as a refugee in 1952. But he went on to say that the US today can't “swing the doors open,” because “we’re not going to welcome all 114 million ([link removed]*1ccbwmc*_rup_ga*MzM5Mzg0MzkwLjE3MTc2MjI2MTI.*_rup_ga_EVDQTJ4LMY*MTcxNzYyMjYxMi4xLjAuMTcxNzYyMjYxMi42MC4wLjA.) people around the world who have been forcibly displaced”—as if that’s the question the US faces, rather than the hundreds of thousands of people who actually seek asylum in the US each year. (Of course, Washington could help ([link removed]) reduce the global refugee crisis by ending support for the wars, insurgencies and sanctions that to a great extent drive it.)


** 'Outcompeted by immigrants'
------------------------------------------------------------
Marketplace: What immigration actually does to jobs, wages and more

Wharton School professor Zeke Hernandez (Marketplace, 12/12/23 ([link removed]) ): "When immigrants arrive, there are not just more workers that are competing with native workers, but there are more people who demand housing, entertainment, food, education. And so you need to hire more people to satisfy that bigger demand."

Admitting that immigration has positive economic impact for the United States, Kristof went for the old line that these newcomers threaten US workers, and that “poor Americans can find themselves hurt by immigrant competition that puts downward pressure on their wages.” Exhibit A is an unnamed neighbor who was forced out of good working-class employment over the decades: “He was hurt by many factors—the decline of unions, globalization and the impact of technology,” Kristof said, but added that “he was also outcompeted by immigrants with a well-earned reputation for hard work.”

First, it is employers, not workers ([link removed]) , who have the power to drive down wages. If there is a problem with immigrants being paid less, that’s an issue of exploitation. If Kristof thought about this a little bit longer, he’d realize he’s making an argument for equality among workers, not for dividing them against each other.

But this assumption that immigration depresses wages is itself dubious. The National Bureau of Economic Research (4/24 ([link removed]) ) said:

We calculate that immigration, thanks to native/immigrant complementarity and college skill content of immigrants, had a positive and significant effect between +1.7 to +2.6% on wages of less-educated native workers, over the period 2000–2019, and no significant wage effect on college-educated natives. We also calculate a positive employment rate effect for most native workers.

Zeke Hernandez ([link removed]) , professor at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, produced similar findings, noting that immigration causes the economies around these newcomer communities to grow (Marketplace, 12/12/23 ([link removed]) ). And the libertarian Cato Institute (7/26/16 ([link removed]) ) showed that unemployment is lower when immigration is higher.


** 'Inflicting even more pain'
------------------------------------------------------------
Axios: How immigration is driving U.S. job growth

Axios (3/13/24 ([link removed]) ): "The immigration increase is a key part of the labor supply surge that helped bring down price pressures last year even amid the economy's robust growth."

Kristof also ignored that the current unemployment rate (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 6/7/24 ([link removed]) ) is low at 4% and that, with high demand for labor, inflation-adjusted wages have risen 4.1% over the past year (AP, 6/7/24 ([link removed]) ). Axios (3/13/24 ([link removed]) ) reported that a

surge in immigration last year helps explain the economy's striking resilience—and if sustained, could allow the job market to keep booming without stoking inflation in the years ahead.

Given that the corporate media have been constantly saying the country is facing a "border crisis," ([link removed]) these facts are hard to square with the notion that immigrants depress native-born workers' wages.

Kristof went on to say that “native-born Americans may not be willing to toil in the fields or on a construction site for $12 an hour, but perhaps would be for $25 an hour.” Once again, if he really felt this way, then he’d be advocating for general wage hikes—for example, raising the federal minimum wage, which hasn't gone up since 2009—as labor advocates demand, instead of calling for closed borders. But Kristof isn’t on the Times opinion page to advance labor’s interests.

And that’s when Kristof invokes a sort of liberal MAGAism, saying that while American workers are “self-medicating and dying from drugs, alcohol and suicide, shouldn’t we be careful about inflicting even more pain on them through immigration policy?” Immigrants—living, breathing people—are associated with non-living toxins, evoking the Trumpian smear that immigrants are disease-carrying vermin (Guardian, 12/16/23 ([link removed]) ).


** 'Lax immigration policies'
------------------------------------------------------------
BillMoyers.com: We Supported Their Dictators, Led the Failed ‘War on Drugs’ and Now Deny Them Refuge

Victoria Sanford (BillMoyers.com, 11/17/17 ([link removed]) ): "Then as now, the US is the engine generating migration through bad foreign policy decisions."

And it still gets worse. Kristof said:

I’ve also wondered about the incentives we inadvertently create. In Guatemalan villages, I’ve seen families prepared to send children on the perilous journey to the United States, and I fear that lax immigration policies encourage people to risk their lives and their children’s lives on the journey.

I have not been to all the places Kristof has, but I’ve been to a few of them, including Guatemala. People leave these places for the US, not because it is so easy, but in spite of the fact that it is so difficult. They come because they are left with no choice but to leave violence, war and poverty behind.

When a man in Lebanon asked that I take him back with me to the US, he was jokingly invoking the reality that the immigration process is impossible without help. Nor did he think there were so many “incentives” beyond the fact that America’s promise of opportunity was an improvement over his broken country.

And it is curious that Kristof mentions Guatemala specifically. Had he read his own newspaper before writing this piece, he might have seen anthropologist Victoria Sanford ([link removed]) (New York Times, 11/9/18 ([link removed]) ; BillMoyers.com, 11/17/17 ([link removed]) ) argue that Central Americans are fleeing the horrific crime that has manifested as a result of Washington’s Cold War interventions and current policies of militarism. Latin American studies professor Elizabeth Oglesby (Vice, 6/28/18 ([link removed]) ) made a similar connection . That’s quite a bit of context to leave out.


** 'Feeding into white nationalism'
------------------------------------------------------------
Arun Gupta on the Santita Jackson Show

Arun Gupta (Santita Jackson Show, 6/6/24 ([link removed]) ): "“Biden is feeding into this white nationalism and saying that the solution is this Fortress America."

I was recently on the Santita Jackson Show (KTNF, 6/6/24 ([link removed]) ) to discuss the recent presidential election in Mexico (FAIR.org, 6/4/24 ([link removed]) ). Joining us was independent journalist Arun Gupta, who has reported from the US/Mexico border for the Nation (4/21/20 ([link removed]) ). He said that the violence of these lawless zones at the border, with migrants waiting to come into the US, will only become more chaotic and dangerous with this new policy.

“Biden is feeding into this white nationalism and saying that the solution is this Fortress America to protect us from these savage brown hordes,” Gupta said. Tens of thousands of migrants have been killed trying to get into the US, he added, and these refugee camps filling up along the border, where narco crime and corrupt police will take more control, will “become death camps.”

Kristof has spent his career telling American readers to care about wars and humanitarian crises abroad (New York Times, 2/6/10 ([link removed]) , 3/9/11 ([link removed]) , 6/16/14 ([link removed]) , 9/4/15 ([link removed]) , 5/15/24 ([link removed]) ). Yet here he is, utterly indifferent to creating a humanitarian catastrophe right at his own country’s door, seemingly in order to run positive spin for an incumbent president who is eager to rise a few points in the polls.

In fact, Kristof ends with almost a parody of liberalism:

Are we, the people of an immigrant nation, pulling up the ladder after we have boarded? Yes, to some degree. But the reality is that we can’t absorb everyone who wants in, and it’s better that the ladder be raised in an orderly way by reasonable people.

In other words, when a Trumpian policy is practiced by a Democratic administration, it is somehow less horrendous. And Kristof fully admits, “as the son of a refugee,” he is selfishly cutting off people much like his father—except from the Global South, not from Eastern Europe.

And this sums up a very central problem with Kristof. For someone who uses globetrotting as his journalistic trademark, he advances a racist idea that the ability to travel and relocate are reserved for people like him—men of the Global North intellectual class and not the wretched of the earth beneath him.
------------------------------------------------------------

ACTION ALERT: You can send a message to the New York Times at [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) . Please remember that respectful communication is the most effective. Feel free to leave a copy of your communication in the comments thread.
Read more ([link removed])

Share this post: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Twitter"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Twitter" alt="Twitter" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Facebook"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Pinterest"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Pinterest" alt="Pinterest" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn" alt="LinkedIn" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Google Plus"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Google Plus" alt="Google Plus" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Instapaper"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Instapaper" alt="Instapaper" class="mc-share"></a>
​

© 2021 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

Our mailing address is:
FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001

FAIR's Website ([link removed])

FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today ([link removed]) .

Follow us on Twitter ([link removed]) | Friend us on Facebook ([link removed])

change your preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
unsubscribe ([link removed]) .