Dear John,

As you have surely heard by now, Canada and other developed countries have committed to achieving “net-zero” carbon emissions by 2050.

… but is there any chance we’re actually going to hit that target?

Right now, in 2024, we are at the halfway point between the Kyoto Protocol (the first international treaty to set binding targets for cutting emissions) and that 2050 target.

And, despite all the government spending, regulations, and grandstanding, global fossil fuel consumption surged by 55% between 1997 and 2023.

Yes, you read that right – at the halfway point between Kyoto and 2050, fossil fuel consumption is not down, but rather way up.

Yet politicians around the world continue insisting that “net zero” by 2050 is achievable.

A new Fraser Institute study shows just how unlikely that is.

Consider this: the 19th-century transition from wood to coal and hydrocarbons replaced about 1.5 billion tons of wood, equivalent to 30 exajoules. The current transition will require at least 400 exajoules of new non-carbon energies by 2050.

Generating this amount of clean energy would require the equivalent of about 22,000 projects the size of British Columbia’s Site C dam.

The Site C dam took 10 years to plan and pass environmental regulations, plus an additional decade to build, and is expected to cost $16 billion.

Again, we’d need 22,000 of those. You do the math.

And that’s to say nothing of critical industries that still rely heavily on fossil fuels with no viable alternatives readily available for large-scale adoption.

Nor of the unprecedented demands for minerals vital for renewable energy technologies, such as copper and lithium, which require substantial time to mine and develop.

Nor of the cost of overhauling existing energy infrastructure! Countries like Canada would need to allocate 20-25% of their annual incomes to the transition. That would obviously mean a major decline in living standards.

And even if a large number of countries could solve those challenges and invest the many trillions of dollars they necessitate, achieving net zero would require extensive and sustained global cooperation.

Given the conflicting political, strategic, and economic interests, it is difficult to imagine a scenario in which the European Union and the United States (who are already reducing emissions) get on the same page as China and India, who are still increasing their coal combustion and have decades of emissions growth ahead of them.

John, this is the type of timely, important research we produce here at the Fraser Institute.

Every single week, we help millions of Canadians cut through noise and political talking points by providing them with the facts.

If you support this mission, please consider making a donation today [[link removed][campaignid]]. We don’t accept government funding – we rely entirely on supporters like you!

Sincerely,

Niels Veldhuis

President

The Fraser Institute

STAY UP TO DATE

SUPPORT THE FRASER INSTITUTE

The Fraser Institute has been ranked the #1 think tank in Canada, and the 14th best think tank out of more than 8,200 around the world! We keep Canadians – and decision-makers! – informed.

But we are only as strong as our supporters. We do not accept government grants or payments for research - we depend on individuals like you to continue our good work! We are a charity - your donation entitles you to a generous tax credit at tax time!

Contact Us [[link removed]] Privacy Policy [[link removed]] Unsubscribe [link removed] The Fraser Institute's mission is to improve the quality of life for Canadians, their families and future generations by studying, measuring and broadly communicating the effects of government policies, entrepreneurship and choice on their well-being. Email is one of the best tools we have to accomplish these goals. If you no longer wish to receive e-mail updates from us, click here to unsubscribe [link removed].

Fraser Institute 4th Floor, 1770 Burrard Street Vancouver, BC V6J 3G7