UPDATE! You may have seen on Rachel Maddow, Lawrence O'Donnell, Jen Psaki,
or in The New York Times or on CNN that video activist Lauren Windsor
caught Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito on audio endorsing the idea that
the nation should return to "godliness" and saying, "One side or the other
is going to win... There are differences on fundamental things that really
can’t be compromised."
MSNBC reports, "Justice Alito secret audio reveals shocking legal bias."
Former NAACP Chair Sherrilyn Ifill called on Merrick Garland to demand
Alito recuse himself on Trump cases.
Rep. Jamie Raskin, a Constitutional expert, recently wrote in a New York
Times [ [link removed] ]op-ed that the Constitution’s Due Process clause can be invoked
to require that Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas
recuse themselves after their spouses hung insurrectionist flags and
collaborated with insurrectionists.
But this move will only happen if Merrick Garland and the Department of
Justice initiate the process. That’s why thousands of PCCC members have
been taking these actions:
1. [ [link removed] ]SIGN THE PETITION: Tell Merrick Garland to formally insist that the
7 other Supreme Court justices require that Justices Alito and Thomas
recuse themselves from cases involving January 6 and Trump.
2. [ [link removed] ]Call the Department of Justice and leave a voice message for
Merrick Garland. (We’ll give you the phone number and a script.)
3. [ [link removed] ]Chip in $3 to fund Lauren Windsor's ongoing work to expose what
right-wing politicians say when they don't think the public can hear
them.
Jamie Raskin explains how Merrick Garland can force Alito and Thomas to
recuse:
"The Justice Department and Attorney General Merrick Garland can invoke
two powerful textual authorities for this motion: the Constitution of the
United States, specifically the due process clause, and the federal
statute mandating judicial disqualification for questionable impartiality,
28 U.S.C. Section 455. The Constitution has come into play in several
recent Supreme Court decisions striking down rulings by stubborn judges in
lower courts whose political impartiality has been reasonably questioned
but who threw caution to the wind to hear a case anyway...
"The recusal statute, if triggered, is not a friendly suggestion. It is
Congress’s command, binding on the justices, just as the due process
clause is. The Supreme Court cannot disregard this law just because it
directly affects one or two of its justices. Ignoring it would trespass on
the constitutional separation of powers because the justices would
essentially be saying that they have the power to override a congressional
command.
"When the arguments are properly before the court, Chief Justice John
Roberts and Associate Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, Ketanji
Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh and Sonia Sotomayor will have
both a constitutional obligation and a statutory obligation to enforce
recusal standards."
Raskin notes that:
"At his Senate confirmation hearing, Chief Justice Roberts assured America
that 'Judges are like umpires.'"
"But professional baseball would never allow an umpire to continue to
officiate the World Series after learning that the pennant of one of the
two teams competing was flying in the front yard of the umpire’s home. Nor
would an umpire be allowed to call balls and strikes in a World Series
game after the umpire’s wife tried to get the official score of a prior
game in the series overthrown and canceled out to benefit the losing team.
If judges are like umpires, then they should be treated like umpires, not
team owners, team fans or players."
Take urgent action today. The Supreme Court could rule on giving Trump
immunity for Jan. 6 as soon as this week.
1. [ [link removed] ]SIGN THE PETITION telling Merrick Garland to insist that the other
7 justices require Alito and Thomas to recuse themselves from cases
involving January 6 and Trump.
2. [ [link removed] ]Call the Department of Justice.
3. [ [link removed] ]Chip in $3 to fund Lauren Windsor's unique activism fighting to
save our democracy!
Thanks for being a bold progressive.
-- The PCCC Team
Paid for by the Progressive Change Campaign Committee PAC (www.BoldProgressives.org) and not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. Contributions to the PCCC are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes.Have you moved? Want to update your email address? Click below.
[link removed]
You can remove yourself from this mailing list at any time:
[link removed]