Europe is effectively combatting Chinese espionage, American higher education should take note
[link removed]
CounterCurrent: China Edition
On Chinese Influence in Universities, Europe May Be Getting It Right
Europe is effectively combatting Chinese espionage, American higher education should take note
CounterCurrent: China Edition is a monthly newsletter of the National Association of Scholars uncovering and highlighting the effects of the Chinese Communist Party's influence on American education.
[link removed]
Category: China, Foreign Influence, Higher Education;
Reading Time: ~4 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------
** On Chinese Influence in Universities, Europe May Be Getting It Right ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
While campus anti-Semitism has stolen the political spotlight on college campuses in the United States, Europe is increasingly viewing its universities as a battleground with Chinese spies. Earlier this month,Politicoreported ([link removed]) that European governments are exploring the creation of “liaison officers” to interface between intelligence agencies and universities in order to protect sensitive research in quantum computing, artificial intelligence, biotech, and microchips. After Confucius Institutes (CIs) became an academic anathema across the West, the hard sciences will be the next battleground with China’s influence. While America and Europe hold different outlooks on today’s geopolitical crises, Europe may have an idea that the United States can emulate to protect its colleges and universities from Beijing.
In a May 23 press release ([link removed]) , the European Council issued policy recommendations to member states of the European Union (EU) in order to counter the “undesirable transfer of knowledge, foreign influence, and ethical or integrity violations.” The recommendations do not mention China, but what is left unsaid is obvious. In late April, Germany arrested ([link removed]) three suspected Chinese spies who were seeking to procure dual-use technologies for Beijing. The spies were targeting ([link removed]) Germany’s universities, and even enjoyed a contractual relationship with the Chemnitz University of Technology.
European sensitivity to espionage is well-founded. China economically ([link removed]) supports Russia amid its war in Ukraine; at the same time, Beijing is likely also helping Russia collect intelligence. In mid-May, Swiss police raided ([link removed]) a chalet owned by suspected Chinese spies stationed next to a base hosting NATO F-35s. In Poland and the Netherlands, authorities ([link removed]) raided the offices of a Chinese company supplying security equipment. In early April, Sweden expelled ([link removed]) a Chinese journalist over national security concerns. In March, multiple ([link removed]) Italian MPs were the targets of Chinese hacking attacks. With
most Russian diplomats expelled ([link removed]) from Europe after the invasion of Ukraine, China may be filling a needed void not only for itself, but also its Russian partner. The EU’s move to seek “liaison officers” between the bloc’s universities and the security services of member states is not an impulsive overreaction.
Some European universities have worked with intelligence services for years. The rector (a European equivalent of chancellor) of the University of Leuven stated ([link removed]) that the school frequently consults with Belgian intelligence. The University of Leuven houses the IMEC, an institute of advanced ([link removed]) microelectronics research, and works closely with Taiwan, South Korea, America, and Japan after effectively kicking China out of most collaboration. In the Netherlands, the government ([link removed]) has worked to create a single contact for universities worried about the integrity of sensitive research. The Dutch effort comes amid increased
([link removed]) targeting of the Netherlands’ high-tech sector by Beijing’s intelligence services imbedded within universities.
America may have something to learn from Europe’s effort countering China. Colleges and universities in the United States are a prime target for Chinese collection of dual-use technologies. New York’s Alfred University closed ([link removed]) its CI last year after it was discovered in proximity to hypersonic weapons research. Earlier this year, the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party opened ([link removed]) an inquiry into ties between Georgia Tech and China’s Tianjin University. In January, Georgia Tech announced its successful collaboration with China to create advanced graphene semiconductors.
A “liaison officer” tasked to interface between universities and domestic counterintelligence authorities offers a simple and elegant step to help counter espionage in American higher education. As a policy idea, the liaison officer is substantive, and on the ground where it counts. Europe’s response to academic espionage has proven remarkably aggressive compared to American efforts. Congressional inquiries offer some sense of comfort that America’s fundamental research will not be reentering the Earth’s atmosphere, at high speeds, and over Taiwan or an American city. And yet, China’s universities continue to work with American counterparts on security-sensitive scientific endeavors.
In January, Reuters reported ([link removed]) that Chinese universities assisted Beijing in obtaining advanced semiconductors from the tech firm Nvidia, and did so despite export controls. China’s crown jewel of universities, Tsinghua, was among the Chinese entities able to procure ([link removed]) the required technology. In another example, the blacklisted Chinese firm ([link removed]) Huawei Technologies was reported to be funding sensitive research at Harvard despite the ban. Huawei funneled ([link removed]) funds to top American researchers via the Optica Foundation in Washington, D.C. These examples underscore the onslaught of Chinese
attempts to penetrate American universities, steal technology, and persuade Americans—an onslaught American authorities appear unable to stop.
A liaison officer who can interface between universities and the intelligence community in a way that allows concerned researchers and graduate students to report suspicious activity solves existing coordination problems for academics who are rightly concerned about China’s access to academia. Currently, no formal mechanism serves to bridge the gap between classrooms and labs on the one hand, and national security on the other. Also, regardless of what proponents of “academic openness” may say, fundamental research can be dangerous and used for war. The goal here should be to make sure that does not happen. Europe appears to be effectively combating Chinese espionage. Americans should take note and recreate those working strategies.
Until next week.
Ian Oxnevad
Senior Fellow for Foreign Affairs and Security Studies
National Association of Scholars
Read the Article ([link removed])
For more on foreign influence, current news, and higher ed:
[link removed]
May 29, 2024
** The Kirkpatrick Doctrine and Domestic Policy ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Eric-Clifford Graf
Jeane Kirkpatrick was the American Ambassador to the United Nations during Ronald Reagan’s presidency. A brilliant and principled woman, she was famous for her pithy characterizations of the surreal, indecorous nature of politics at the UN.
[link removed]
May 24, 2024
** Send Your Nominations for the 2024 MTC Lysenko Award ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Louis K. Bonham
It’s time again for the Minding the Campus Trofim Lysenko Award for the Suppression of Academic Speech. Submit your nomination ([link removed]) by June 07, 2024.
[link removed]
September 12, 2022
** Report: Outsourced to Qatar ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Neetu Arnold
This case study reveals how Qatar uses partnerships with American universities to advance its own interests and values.
** About the NAS
------------------------------------------------------------
The National Association of Scholars, founded in 1987, emboldens reasoned scholarship and propels civil debate. We’re the leading organization of scholars and citizens committed to higher education as the catalyst of American freedom.
============================================================
Follow NAS on social media.
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
| ** Join ([link removed])
| ** Renew ([link removed])
| ** Bookstore ([link removed])
Copyright © 2024 National Association of Scholars, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website, membership or donation forms, contact forms at events, or by signing open letters.
Our mailing address is:
National Association of Scholars
420 Madison Avenue
7th Floor
New York, NY 10017-2418
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
