[link removed]

FAIR
View article on FAIR's website ([link removed])
There's No Reason to Turn Airtime Over to Trump's Deceptive Coronavirus Campaign Rallies Julie Hollar ([link removed])


[link removed] the 2016 election, many journalists (e.g., New York Times, 3/27/16 ([link removed]) ) lamented their role in elevating Donald Trump to victory by handing him billions of dollars of free publicity ([link removed]) , in exchange for the ratings and clicks ([link removed]) his outrageous rhetoric and behavior generated for them. And yet they will never learn their lesson: Despite weeks of open discussion ([link removed]) about Donald Trump's daily briefings serving as little more than campaign rallies ([link removed]) full of harmful misinformation ([link removed]) ,
television networks continue to broadcast them live (now with some cut-aways and factchecking), and some reporters continue to cover the tension as just another partisan battle with no clear right or wrong.

For weeks now, Trump has been seizing on the Covid-19 crisis gripping the nation and the world as an opportunity to snag free air time. The primetime briefings have been a campaign bonanza for Trump: Democratic nominee-apparent Joe Biden had 13 media appearances from March 14–28, according to his campaign (The Hill, 4/3/20 ([link removed]) ), reaching a total of some 20 million people. Trump's briefings during that time had an average daily audience of 8.5 million (New York Times, 3/25/20 ([link removed]) )—and that's not even counting his other media appearances.
NYT: Trump’s Briefings Are a Ratings Hit. Should Networks Cover Them Live?

The New York Times (3/25/20 ([link removed]) ) balances ratings that "rivaled the audiences for hit reality shows" against the fact that "some worry about misinformation."

Airing the president's briefings about an unprecedented crisis at first made sense, but it very quickly became apparent to some of the more clear-headed observers that Trump's errors, lies and self-aggrandizement were not, in fact, newsworthy. Pundits like Margaret Sullivan (Washington Post, 3/21/20 ([link removed]) ), Rachel Maddow (MSNBC, 3/20/20 ([link removed]) ) and James Fallows (Atlantic, 3/20/20 ([link removed]) ) began calling for networks to stop airing the briefings live, while others clung to the fantasy that limiting Trump's airtime would be "censorship" (Chicago Tribune, 3/30/20
([link removed]) ; see FAIR.org, 3/31/20 ([link removed]) ).

But move away from the opinion columns, and too many journalists have fallen back on the safety of "balance." A New York Times piece (3/25/20 ([link removed]) ) about the coverage offered a perfectly Timesian on-the-one-hand-on-the-other headline: "Trump’s Briefings Are a Ratings Hit. Should Networks Cover Them Live?,” followed by the subhead: “The president’s viewership has rivaled the audiences for hit reality shows and prime-time football. But some worry about misinformation."

At the Washington Post (4/10/20 ([link removed]) ), Amber Phillips even went so far as to give readers a pros and cons list of whether Trump should continue his briefings. (The first pro: "It’s a way for him to project that he’s in control of the crisis.")

Time's Tessa Berenson (3/30/20 ([link removed]) ) gave a master class in how not to cover a journalistic dilemma, under the headline, "'He's Walking the Tightrope.' How Donald Trump Is Getting Out His Message on Coronavirus." Berenson wrote that the briefings, which she acknowledged "have become his new rallies," appear to have given Trump a polling boost.

She explained: "Some experts say that’s because Trump has found the right balance between the competing demands of the public health crisis and a spiraling economy." Which experts, exactly? Republican pollster Frank Luntz, who told Berenson, "He’s walking the tightrope, but so far so good.” And, later, Matt Benyon, identified as "a former communications adviser to Rick Santorum's presidential campaigns." Note that part of how Trump is getting out his message is by Time letting a Republican spin doctor write its headlines.
WaPo: The media’s struggle to digest Trump’s coronavirus briefings

For the Washington Post's Erik Wemple (4/8/20 ([link removed]) ), the "only response" possible to Trump routinely misinforming the public through his briefings is for media to "work harder" to factcheck them.

CNN and MSNBC have seemed to settle on a policy of airing the briefings, but cutting away at times from Trump's monologues, and to offer some after-the-fact factchecking ([link removed]) . But there is no reason—other than a desire for ratings, or a seriously misguided ([link removed]) understanding of what journalism is—to continue to give Trump airtime for his briefings, factchecked or not. Not every presidential utterance is inherently newsworthy; naturally the actions of the powerful have impact, but reporters can cover that impact without handing Trump the mic.

As the Washington Post's Erik Wemple (4/8/20 ([link removed]) ) pointed out, factcheckers can't possibly keep up with unspinning all the lies and distortions Trump disgorges in his typically lengthy briefings; as Politifact's editor told Wemple, if they tried to do that, they wouldn't be able to factcheck anything else.

Yet Wemple draws from this an impossible conclusion: "The only response is to work harder."

The real response here ought to be clear: If the powerful are spreading life-threatening lies, do not freely give them a huge platform to reach more people with those lies. By offering Trump live airtime for his coronavirus briefings-cum-campaign rallies (and by covering that decision with a shrug), media repeat the same mistakes of election 2016—with even more harmful consequences.


Read more ([link removed])

© 2020 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

Our mailing address is:
FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001

FAIR's Website ([link removed])

FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today ([link removed]) .

Follow us on Twitter ([link removed]) | Friend us on Facebook ([link removed])

change your preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
unsubscribe ([link removed]) .