May 20, 2024
The tale of two farm bills edition. One of the most important jobs Congress must accomplish during its remaining time before final adjournment is passage of the 2024 Farm Bill. This legislation – which is scheduled to be renewed every five years – is of utmost importance to human needs advocates because it sets policies and funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the nation’s most important and effective tool for fighting hunger.
Earlier this month, both the Democratic Chairwoman of the Senate Agriculture Committee and the Republican Chairman of the House Agriculture Committee released competing visions of what a 2024 Farm Bill should look like. The two legislators’ visions stand in great contrast, particularly when it comes to SNAP.
On a positive note, the outline released by Senate Agriculture Committee Chair Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) makes significant improvements to SNAP. It would establish a path for Puerto Rico to eventually participate fully in the program, which would be a significant step toward addressing food insecurity and poverty in the U.S. territory. And it would restore SNAP eligibility for people convicted of a drug-related felony, ending an obsolete policy that, because of racial inequities in drug prosecutions, discriminates based on race. It would also reduce barriers to SNAP participation for older adults, military families, and some college students. Meanwhile it allots millions of dollars to America’s essential food and farmworkers and safeguards the workforce that helps SNAP participants enroll in or renew their benefits to protect program integrity.
In marked contrast, there are serious threats to SNAP benefits in the bill proposed by Rep. Glenn “GT” Thompson (R-PA). It includes a proposal that policy experts say could result in a $30 billion cut to future SNAP benefits. Thompson reportedly would curtail the ability of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to update the cost of the Thrifty Food Plan (TFP) – which USDA uses to determine the level of monthly SNAP benefits – outside of inflation. If this happens, every one of the more than 40 million Americans who receive SNAP would be affected. “Over the longer term, the cuts would grow larger and SNAP benefits would become less adequate,” says the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
While there are improvements to nutrition assistance that advocates support, the bill includes attacks on the SNAP workforce and stakeholders have come together to oppose a Farm Bill that would make harmful cuts and policy changes to any of the federal nutrition programs.
The House Agriculture Committee will mark up their bill Thursday (May 23) and we can’t let this harmful bill move forward. Tell your House member cuts to nutrition assistance are unacceptable. Click here.
You can share these numbers on Facebook and Twitter.