For generations, commonsense disclosure rules have let the American people know
who is giving how much to which political candidates.

That transparency is essential to our democracy — so that we know who the
biggest spenders are and, in turn, who our politicians could be indebted to.

But, shockingly, one member of the Federal Election Commission (FEC) is
proposing to make it easy for big campaign donors to evade this baseline level
of transparency about money in politics.

I know it may sound like that can’t possibly be true, given that the FEC is the
government agency that is *supposed* to safeguard the fairness and integrity of
our elections.

But, sadly, I’m not making it up.

An FEC commissioner named Allen Dickerson is proposing to let big campaign
contributors evade disclosure just by claiming they *might* be harassed over
their election spending.

The FEC is deciding this Thursday whether to move forward with Dickerson’s
outlandish, pro-corruption proposal.

Tell the Federal Election Commission:
[[link removed]]

Democracy without a system of meaningful disclosure of money in politics
endangers the integrity of the political process. Disclosure of the sources of
political spending is a necessary check on the power of money and bolsters the
moral responsibility of citizens to stand behind their speech. The FEC should
reject Commissioner Dickerson’s anti-transparency proposal.
[[link removed]]

Click to add your name now. [[link removed]]

Thanks for taking action.

For democracy,

- Robert Weissman, President of Public Citizen


Public Citizen | 1600 20th Street NW | Washington DC 20009 | Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]