Definitely not small donors. ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

[link removed]

In the 1896 election, Mark Hanna, the campaign strategist for William McKinley, memorably quipped, “There are two things that are important in politics. The first is money and I can’t remember what the second one is.”

A recent news story tells the tale of our new Gilded Age.

Last week, a gaggle of moguls made news by having dinner. Hosted by venture capitalist David Sacks, the party included Elon Musk, the world’s second-richest man, along with Rupert Murdoch (see Succession season four); Peter Thiel, who almost single-handedly put J.D. Vance in the Senate; Travis Kalanick, cofounder of Uber; and Michael Milken, whom those of a certain age will remember as the formerly jailed “junk bond king” pardoned by Donald Trump. The meeting was taken as a sign of Silicon Valley warming to Donald Trump and a turn toward the right in that community of vast concentrated wealth and cultural power.

That conclave reveals much about the real story of money in American politics. Ever since Citizens United effectively deregulated campaign money in the United States, there’s been a race between a flood of small donors empowered by digital fundraising and big donors unleashed by the Supreme Court. Small donors get the ink. More than we realize, though, big donors like Musk and his friends have secured the power.

Small donors gave more than $4 billion in the 2020 federal elections, up from $1 billion in 2016. Largely good news, one might think. Yet because that rise has coincided with ever worsening polarization, some pundits have blamed American political dysfunction

[link removed]

on those $10 and $20 gifts flooding in to some politicians.

A new analysis

[link removed]

by my Brennan Center colleague Ian Vandewalker punctures many of these myths.

For starters, while funds from small donors have grown, those from megadonors have risen much faster. As the Brennan Center reported

[link removed]

last year, in 2022 just 100 big donors still outspent all small donors by 60 percent. Small donors are still swamped by big donors. “In 2022, just 21 individuals and couples together spent $783 million, easily outspending the total given by the millions of people who made small donations,” Vandewalker writes.

Those big donors can be just as ideologically extreme as small donors. Incumbents, especially Republicans, live in terror of a billionaire-funded super PAC dumping huge sums to defeat them. Megadonors now sponsor candidates like prize racehorses.

What about polarizing attention-getters like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), currently busy torturing House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA)? True, figures like Greene attract small donors through a freaky political brand. So do some firebrands on the left. But most small donor money goes not to the most extreme candidates, but to the most famous. Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham (SC) and Democrat Rep. Nancy Pelosi (CA), establishment stalwarts, have raised staggering sums from small donors. Donors from around the country pour money into races to support candidates such as whoever is running against Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) at any time.

Polarization in politics has many causes. So does the fracturing of power that has made the House, especially, ungovernable. In the quarter century since 1998, Republicans have chosen seven House speakers; the Democrats, one. All that fractiousness, basically limited to one party, rose before social media and online fundraising platform ActBlue and cannot be blamed on the recent rise of small donors.

In any case, there’s a way to minimize any harm from the surge in small donors even while bolstering the trend. Public financing of campaigns remains the best way to ensure that politicians can listen and respond to the needs of citizens, not just donors. A new program enacted in New York State provides multiple matching funds for small donations when those gifts come from within a district. Federal legislation such as the Freedom to Vote Act should provide matching funds for in-state contributors only. That would keep the politicians closer to home.





Threats to Elections Persist

A new Brennan Center survey

[link removed]

has found that large numbers of election officials continue to face threats and abuse for doing their jobs, with many concerned about the safety of their staff and colleagues. They’re also worried about the possibility of political interference in the 2024 elections. Against this backdrop, more than 90 percent of the surveyed officials have taken steps to increase election security since 2020. While these precautions will help ensure that both voters and election workers can participate safely in the democratic process, “election officials report that they need more resources to keep up with administrative and security needs,” Ruby Edlin and Lawrence Norden write. Read more

[link removed]

How Election Officials Can Gear Up for AI Threats

Many election officials worry they lack awareness of how artificial intelligence may endanger our elections and how to guard against it. Last December, the Brennan Center and our partners conducted a tabletop exercise with the Arizona secretary of state’s office in which participants practiced responding to AI-related disruptions to election operations. We compiled the lessons from these simulations into a detailed guide that will help election officials around the country better understand, identify, prepare for, and respond to the various threats AI could pose to the upcoming elections. READ MORE

[link removed]

Closing the Gender Fundraising Gap

The share of women in public office has surged in recent years, but women still remain starkly underrepresented in government, in part because of fundraising barriers. Since women candidates, especially women of color, rely more heavily than men on small donors, amplifying these contributions through public financing programs could help more women run for office and get elected. “While public financing on its own will not resolve the gender inequities in our politics, it’s a vital tool for ensuring this pipeline continues to exist,” Marina Pino and Julia Fishman write in Ms. magazine. Read more

[link removed]

Barriers to Bail Reform

The cash bail system leaves hundreds of thousands of people behind bars for months or even years, not because they have been proven guilty or are a public safety threat, but because they can’t afford to pay. Yet efforts at changing this unfair system run into challenges, including lobbying by the for-profit bail bond industry that generates billions of dollars from people’s inability to post bail up front. A new Brennan Center analysis explains how this industry works and how it stands in the way of reforming or abolishing cash bail. READ MORE

[link removed]

PODCAST: The Failed Experiment of Mass Incarceration

[link removed]

Our latest podcast episode features contributors to the new book Excessive Punishment: How the Justice System Creates Mass Incarceration

[link removed]

, edited by the Brennan Center’s Lauren-Brooke Eisen. They discuss how to ensure public safety without perpetuating the harms of the current system. Listen on Spotify

[link removed]

, Apple Podcasts

[link removed]

, or your favorite podcast platform

[link removed]

.





News

Lauren-Brooke Eisen on elderly people behind bars // VOX

[link removed]

Douglas Keith on heightened scrutiny for state judges // NEW YORK TIMES

[link removed]

Yurij Rudensky on partisan gerrymandering in Ohio // WOSU

[link removed]

Robyn Sanders on the influence of state attorneys general on voting rights // NC NEWSLINE

[link removed]

Daniel Weiner on the megadonor backing both Trump and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. // USA TODAY

[link removed]

Feedback on this newsletter? Email us at [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]







[link removed]

Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law

120 Broadway, Suite 1750 New York, NY 10271

646-292-8310

tel:646-292-8310

[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Support Brennan Center

[link removed]

Want to change how you receive these emails or unsubscribe? Click here

[link removed]

to update your preferences.

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]