Join us tomorrow at 2pm ET for a special webinar discussion with FairVote's new
CEO, Meredith Sumpter. Donate Today!


Dear John,

As the 2024 presidential primaries draw to a close, it's hard to ignore the
glaring problems with our choose-one elections. In a newop-ed,FairVote CEO
Meredith Sumpter and Research Director Deb Otis capture the severe lack of voter
choice and bad incentives at work in this year’s primary cycle, and discuss how
ranked choice voting(RCV) can fix the problem in 2028.

Read on to learn more about this year’s presidential primaries, and remember:
There’s still time toregister for our webinarwith Meredith Sumpter tomorrow, May
9 at 2 pm eastern. She’ll discuss her background – including her previous work
in both the nonprofit and private sectors – as well as her first month at
FairVote, her vision for the organization going forward, and her focus on how
election reform can make government deliver for every American.

Register Today RANKED CHOICE VOTING SOLVES PROBLEMS IN PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARIES
Let's face it: This whole primary cycle feels like a missed opportunity. Donald
Trump and Joe Biden clinched their party’s nominations before voters in almost
half the states had a chance to cast a ballot. Only aboutone in 10voters
nationwide took part in a primary or caucus through Super Tuesday, and turnout
has tumbled further sincethen.

The absence of competition in this primary cycle is troubling. Many candidates
dropped out early due to low initial poll numbers, or concerns about “splitting
the vote” with like-minded candidates. Voters were left with limited options and
diminished enthusiasm for the democratic process. This undermines the core
principles of fair representation and voter engagement – but it doesn't have to
stay this way.

Ranked choice voting fosters a competitive electoral landscape by allowing more
candidates to stay in the race. As Meredith and Deb write:

“RCV would have guaranteed meaningful voter choice in the primary. An RCV
election works like an instant runoff: If everyone finishes short of 50 percent,
the last-place candidates are eliminated and backup choices come into play. No
one has to worry about playing ‘spoiler’ – a [Chris] Christie voter could select
[Nikki] Haley second and a [Ron] DeSantis supporter might pick [Donald] Trump as
her backup.”

RCV also reduces “zombie votes” – votes for candidates who have already dropped
out of the race. Meredith and Deb note that:


“This year, over 300,000 Republicans voted for a candidate who already exited
the field. On the Democratic side in 2020, well over 3 million votes — about one
out of every 10 cast — went toward a withdrawn ‘zombie’ candidate… Ranked choice
voting would give every voter a backup choice and ensure that no ballots are
wasted.”

50 cities, counties, and statesalready use RCVfor their elections – improving
their campaigns and letting a more diverse range of candidates run. In the seven
statesandterritoriesthat have used RCV in presidential primaries, voters had
more meaningful choices and no fear of casting a "zombie vote."

Yet it shouldn't stop there: With widespread adoption of RCV, every voter will
have a meaningful voice in shaping the outcomes of our elections. As the op-ed
concludes:


“The current process isn’t working for voters or political parties, and it isn’t
generating results that give American voters confidence in our democracy. We can
do better. This current moment of shared bipartisan frustration – before we
harden into partisan camps again – is the time to address it.”

Thank you for reading, and I hope to see you at the webinar tomorrow!

Sabrina Laverty,
FairVote Research Analyst


Donate Today Copyright © 2024 FairVote, All rights reserved.




Our mailing address is:

8484 Georgia Ave, Suite 240, Silver Spring, MD 20910




Want to change how you receive these emails?

You can unsubscribe from this list.