Logo for The Tapback from Civic Action [[link removed]]
CALLING CARD
It’s always amusing to see what happens when a coalition of big banks and their associates tries to pose as Friends of the Common Man. So it’s definitely worth scoffing when the headline “Working-class Americans Depend on Credit Card Rewards” appeared in a Politico ad from the so-called “ Electronic Payments Coalition [[link removed]] ,” linking to a blog post [[link removed]] which is part of their ongoing effort to lobby against proposed federal rules which would limit how much they can charge retailers in credit card fees.
Yes, their communication style lacks a certain common touch — for example, they use LMI in their headline to refer to “Low to Moderate Income” cardholders, as if that’s a well-known acronym. But what’s really galling is their claim that “the most financially vulnerable households depend on cashback rewards to help make ends meet ” and that such rewards “ served as a lifeline ” in times of record inflation. Yes, they’re talking about the supposed life-saving value of credit card rewards programs. And no, they’re not mentioning the 30% interest rates they are charging borrowers with one hand while they give back 1% in “rewards” with the other . Tie customers to a massive anchor, follow it with a tiny flotation device, and call yourself a savior.
Make it make sense.
Three Numbers [[link removed]]
140,803 Americans [[link removed]] used the IRS’s free new direct file service [[link removed]] this year, which was only available in a dozen states, and only for taxpayers with simple returns. Users saved more than $5 million in tax prep fees, and more than 9 in 10 expressed satisfaction with the software.
$155 [[link removed]] is what an Ozempic prescription costs in Canada, as compared to $969 here in the US for the same dose [[link removed]] of the same diabetes and weight loss medication . The FTC is investigating Novo Nordisk, which makes the drug, for abusing bogus patents to delay competition from generic manufacturers so they can keep prices artificially high.
27% of all inflation [[link removed]] was caused by oil price-fixing coordinated by the CEO of a Texas oil company and OPEC officials, argues [[link removed]] Matt Stoller in a recent newsletter. The CEO successfully helped reduce oil production across the board in order to keep prices high , and those high prices led to massive corporate profits, which cost a typical American consumer hundreds if not thousands of dollars a year.
A Chart [[link removed]]
We’ve spent plenty of space in Tapbacks past on various charts illustrating the extraordinary inequity of our tax system , and how that inequity has grown over time. But this one, recently featured [[link removed]] in The New York Times , may be the most striking yet. Quite simply, it compares the changes in tax rates over time between the bottom half of income earners in the US, and the 400 very richest people in the country. And recently, for the first time ever, the richest few people are paying a lower effective tax rate than the bottom half .
Notably, that’s not because tax rates have changed very much for the bottom half: they were paying a 22% effective tax rate in 1960, and a similar 24% rate in 2018. But the billionaires have seen a windfall: their rate has plunged from 56% all the way down to 23% . It all adds up to a potent graphical case for a global minimum tax on billionaires.
[link removed] [[link removed]]
Blowing up the Groupchat [[link removed]]
This past October, the local government in San Juan County, Washington, launched a trial reducing the workweek [[link removed]] for County workers to 32 hours, with no loss in income . Six months later, the early results are in — and it looks promising. The County is finding it much easier to recruit workers, and fewer people are quitting, so they no longer have to wrestle with a high job vacancy rate. Job satisfaction is up dramatically. And employees are spending their extra time on errands, appointments, hobbies, and with their families.
While adjustments will need to be made in some areas, and the reduced workweek isn’t permanent yet , add the results from San Juan County to the growing pile of evidence: when we reduce the workweek so people have more control over their time , workers thrive, productivity increases, and everyone does better . Now, it just needs to spread. (Or we all need to move to San Juan County.)
What did you think? Choose a reaction:
[link removed] [[link removed]] [link removed] [[link removed]] [link removed] [[link removed]] [link removed] [[link removed]] [link removed] [[link removed]] [link removed] [[link removed]]
Did someone forward you this email? Subscribe here. [[link removed]]
SUBSCRIBE [[link removed]]
[link removed] [[link removed]] [link removed] [[link removed]] [link removed] [[link removed]]

Civic Action
119 1st Avenue South Suite 320
Seattle, WA 98014
United States
If you believe you received this message in error or wish to no longer receive email from us, please unsubscribe: [link removed] .