View in browser | Support our newsroom

THE WEEKLY REVEAL

Saturday, May 4, 2024

Hello! In this issue:

  • After police shootings, officers are supposed to tell the family right away. But these detectives had another priority: asking questions about the deceased.
  • How military-grade surveillance infected a Salvadoran newsroom.

THIS WEEK’S PODCAST

We Regret to Inform You

Mourners stand near a memorial for 34-year-old Brandon Lopez on Santa Ana Boulevard during a vigil in Santa Ana, Calif., in 2021. Credit: Getty Images

After police kill someone, the department is supposed to notify the family. But consultant Bruce Praet advises officers to use that interaction as an opportunity.

Praet is a well-known name in law enforcement, especially across California. He co-founded a company called Lexipol that contracts with more than 95% of police departments in the state and offers its clients training and ready-made policies.

In one of Praet’s training webinars, posted online, he offers advice aimed squarely at protecting police departments: Instead of delivering the news of the death immediately, he suggests officers could first ask about the person who was killed to get as much information as possible.

Reporter Brian Howey started looking into this advice when he was with the Investigative Reporting Program at UC Berkeley’s Graduate School of Journalism. He found that officers have been using this tactic across California, and there was a real impact: The information families disclosed before they knew their relative was killed by police had an effect on their lawsuits later.

In this update of an episode that first aired last year, Howey interviews families that have been on the receiving end of this controversial policing tactic and tracks down Praet to interview him about the consequences of his advice.

Listen to the episode
🎧 Other places to listen: Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
 

 

A Quote to Remember

“I felt that my first obligation was letting everybody know that the healthiest decision would be to leave, to quit El Faro. … But if you wanted to stay, you should know that silence is not an option.”

El Faro editor Carlos Dada and his staff were used to security threats. But the risks hit another level when they found out the smartphones of many staff members had been hacked by Pegasus, a military-grade surveillance tool available to governments. 

Listen: The Spy Inside Your Smartphone

 

In Case You Missed It

🎧 In Gaza, Every Pregnancy is Complicated
🎧 After the Crash
This issue of The Weekly Reveal was written by Kate Howard and edited by Nikki Frick. If you enjoyed this issue, forward it to a friend. Have some thoughts? Drop us a line with feedback or ideas!
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
Donate
Copyright © 2024 The Center for Investigative Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for The Weekly Reveal newsletter.

Our mailing address is:
The Center for Investigative Reporting
PO Box 584
San Francisco, CA 94104

Add us to your address book


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from all Reveal emails.