Here’s how some states are trying to fix it.

View this email in your browser ([link removed])


** The American Primary System Is Broken
------------------------------------------------------------


** Here’s how some states are trying to fix it
------------------------------------------------------------

RENEW DEMOCRACY INITIATIVE

APR 26

It’s a presidential election year, and poll ([link removed]) after poll ([link removed]) suggests that Americans did not want the matchup we’re facing in November between President Joe Biden and Donald Trump.

It begs the question: If this rematch between two historically unpopular candidates ([link removed]) is the last thing Americans say they wanted, how did we end up here? Well, it’s partly due to a complicated mix of factors involving party politics, money, and historical custom with regard to incumbency. But ultimately, it was primary voters who chose Biden and Trump.

Ah, primary elections. So important, and yet so poorly attended—and this year, so pointless in terms of the presidential race for many states. In this issue, we’ll explore some of the ways states are tweaking the primary system to potentially improve participation and outcomes. —Melissa Amour, Managing Editor


** A Uniquely Horrible Choice
------------------------------------------------------------

If there’s a consistent area of agreement across party lines these days, it’s that the US primary system is broken. Without the enticement of a presidential choice, voters tend to tune out altogether. This week’s Pennsylvania primary ([link removed]) is a good example—bringing just 29 percent ([link removed]) of registered voters to the polls.

Despite historically high voter turnout in 2020, only 10 percent ([link removed]) of eligible American voters nationwide cast ballots in the primary elections that effectively decided the winners of 83 percent of Congressional seats. “Primary elections are by far the most visible way we have turned power over to our most partisan, polarized citizens,” says Todd Washburn ([link removed]) , who teaches a course on the polarization of American politics at the Harvard Extension School.

The result? “American politics has become like a bitter sports rivalry, in which the parties hang together mainly out of sheer hatred of the other team, rather than a shared sense of purpose,” say Alan Abramowitz and Steven Webster ([link removed]) of Emory University. So how can we reform the primary election system to make our government more representative and collaborative again? Let’s take a look.


** What You Should Know
------------------------------------------------------------

Primary elections vary widely across states. There are currently seven different types ([link removed]) of primary elections, including closed primaries in which only voters registered with a political party are able to participate. In those states, independent or unaffiliated voters are completely shut out of the process. A few states, including Nevada ([link removed]) , Pennsylvania ([link removed]) , and Oregon, are actively trying to remedy that.

“I don’t think we’re going to create a better future and realize the potential of our state unless we are fully including every single eligible voter in elections.” —Michael Calcagno ([link removed]) , chair of the All Oregon Votes Committee

Other states are trying to restrict open primary systems—where all voters can participate and even vote across party lines. Campaigns to close primaries are active in states like Colorado ([link removed]) , Tennessee ([link removed]) , and Texas ([link removed]) , and have been successful in Louisiana ([link removed]) .

“[The open] primary system prevents Louisiana’s political parties from selecting their preferred candidates. Each major party, Democratic and Republican, deserves an opportunity to choose its nominee ahead of the general election. Closed primaries afford the fairest system for voters and ensure that both major parties have representation on the final ballot.” —Clay Higgins ([link removed]) , US Representative from Louisiana

More and more, policies attempting to reform the primary system are falling along partisan lines. That trend mostly holds up with another potential primary election reform—ranked-choice voting (RCV). RCV has been adopted in states like Maine and Alaska with the goal of making primaries more competitive.

“[RCV] is basically a winnowing process. While recognizing the candidate preferred by most voters—not simply by Democratic or Republican voters—it also tests how deep that preference goes. And eliminates those that are not strongly preferred by most voters. No more two-person, ‘lesser of two evils’ choices. And it has the potential to advantage candidates who are more centrist as well, since they would not be eliminated in a sharply partisan primary election where only the purest party identifiers tend to vote.” —R. Bruce Anderson ([link removed]) , chair of American History, Government, and Civics at Florida Southern College

But while some states and localities are trying to adopt RCV ([link removed]) , others are preemptively banning it. After it was widely blamed ([link removed]) by Republicans for helping to defeat Sarah Palin and Kelly Tshibaka in their respective races for the US House and Senate in 2022, it has been banned statewide in Kentucky ([link removed]) , South Dakota ([link removed]) , and Idaho ([link removed]) , among other states, through GOP-led measures.

How We Got Here

If primaries are so problematic that even the solutions are divisive, how did we end up with them in the first place? Ironically, they came about as an effort to reform the previous nominating system. Before direct primary elections were introduced, parties were more like private clubs that selected candidates through member conventions or infamous “smoke-filled rooms ([link removed]) .” Progressive reformers sought to end that system in the early 20th century.

“At a time when candidates were selected in back-room deals, by party bosses, without any public involvement, a time when urban political machines, like Tammany Hall in New York, selected candidates who would do their bidding once in office, reformers (progressives) decided to circumvent the smoke-filled room with an open party vetting system that brought average voters into the selection process.” —Clay Jenkinson ([link removed]) , host of “The Thomas Jefferson Hour” podcast

But parties seeking electoral advantages ([link removed]) found ways to secure them over time.

“[Through] decades of sophisticated, computer-enabled gerrymandering, you get extreme candidates who run in safe districts where the only threat to them is a primary candidate who is even more extreme.” —Fareed Zakaria ([link removed]) , foreign affairs columnist at The Washington Post

With a record 49 percent ([link removed]) of Americans now defining themselves as politically independent—a number equivalent to the two major parties combined—the political and fundraising power of both parties is being threatened. Neither is particularly inclined to reform a system in a way that could further damage its electoral prospects.

“Unfortunately, voters are stuck with the political whims of lawmakers loyal, first and foremost, to their party.” —Shawn Griffiths ([link removed]) , election reform expert at Independent Voter News

But while the two major parties play a big role in primary election dysfunction, that doesn’t change the fact that low voter turnout remains a driving factor behind widespread discontent as well.

“A small minority of Americans decide the significant majority of our elections in partisan primaries that disenfranchise voters, distort representation, and fuel extremism––on both the left and, most acutely (at present), the right.” —Nick Troiano ([link removed]) , executive director of Unite America

What People Are Saying

There are no easy solutions to our primary election problem.

“[Letting parties decide internally] makes nominating too exclusive and potentially susceptible to corruption, given that most nominees will face no other general election challenge in a two-party system that is highly sorted by geography. [Letting anybody compete] creates a problem of cognitive overload, in which voters will be asked to consider way too many candidates, without clear party endorsements. Under such nonpartisan conditions, voters are more likely to choose based on name recognition (benefiting well-financed candidates and/or celebrities), or more discouragingly, ethnic in-group favoritism.” —Lee Drutman ([link removed]) , election reform expert and senior fellow at the New America Foundation

While reforms like open primaries and ranked-choice voting have their supporters and detractors, both political sides recognize a need for change. Those on the Left point to the enduring primacy of the two party system.

“America has a two-party political system that encourages candidates to appeal, first and foremost, to members of their own party—while locking out independents, third parties, and other sources of competition.” —Alex Tausanovitch ([link removed]) , former senior fellow at the Center for American Progress

And some on the Right see primaries as the main cause of the America’s culture wars.

“Instead of spinning your wheels trying to put out a myriad of culture war fires, it would make sense to attack the root cause of the problem—the method of selecting the people who orchestrate the divisiveness and chaos.” —Jim Jones ([link removed]) , former Republican attorney general of Idaho and justice on the Idaho Supreme Court

But no reform will work without voter participation. It's still up to Americans to vote for the people and policies that represent them best.

“Increasing participation in voting will only strengthen our electoral system, restoring trust in the political process and ensuring that the men and women who win office have the backing of a majority of citizens.” —Santa Fe New Mexican ([link removed]) editorial board
* Democracy Dies in Primaries —RealClearPolitics ([link removed])
* There’s Hope for American Democracy. The New Hampshire Primary Shows Us Why —CNN ([link removed])
* Majority of Alaskans Voted Across Party Lines in '22 Open RCV Primary, Study Says —Alaska Public Media ([link removed])
* Nonpartisan Primaries Would Ease U.S. Polarization, Advocates Say —NPR ([link removed])
* America's Winner-Take-All Electoral System Is Tearing the Country Apart —The UnPopulist ([link removed])

* SCOTUS decides: Trump Immunity Claim in Election Interference Case Heard by Supreme Court —NBC News ([link removed])
* Biden signs: Biden Signs TikTok Ban Bill Into Law. Here’s What Happens Next —The New York Times ([link removed])
* Arizona indicts: Meadows, Giuliani, and Other Trump Allies Charged in Arizona 2020 Election Probe —The Washington Post ([link removed])
* Food for thought: Are Americans Turning Against Representative Democracy Along With Commitment to Democratic Values? —The UnPopulist ([link removed])
* Give this a read: Healthy Democracies Reject the Mob —The xxxxxx ([link removed])

* China: China Warns Blinken US Must Choose Between ‘Cooperation or Confrontation’ —Financial Times ([link removed])
* Haiti: Ariel Henry Resigns as Prime Minister of Haiti, Paving the Way for a New Government to Take Power —AP News ([link removed])
* Russia: Russia Says It May Downgrade Ties with US if Its Assets Are Confiscated —Reuters ([link removed])
* Ukraine: Biden Signs Foreign Aid Bill Providing Crucial Military Assistance to Ukraine, Others —CNN Politics ([link removed])
* Yemen: Ship Attacked off Coast of Yemen as Houthi Rebel Campaign Appears Reinvigorated —The Times of Israel ([link removed])

Hey Topline readers, you remember the drill. We want to hear your reactions to today’s stories. We’ll include some of your replies in this space in our next issue of The Topline. Click here ([link removed]) to share your take, and don’t forget to include your name and state. We’re looking forward to hearing from you!
Got feedback? Let us know (mailto:[email protected])
[link removed]

Copyright (C) 2024 Renew Democracy Initiative. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.
Our mailing address is:
Renew Democracy Initiative
1230 6th Ave
New York, NY 10020
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences ([link removed]) or unsubscribe ([link removed])