[[link removed]]
MORE THAN A MAGAZINE, A MOVEMENT
Today at Ms. | April 24, 2024
With Today at Ms. —a daily newsletter from the team here at Ms. magazine—our top stories are delivered straight to your inbox every afternoon, so you’ll be informed and ready to fight back.
‘Tragedy Upon Tragedy’: What the Justices’ Questions on EMTALA Revealed [[link removed]]
[link removed] [[link removed]]
Abortion rights supporters rally outside the Supreme Court on April 24, 2024. (Andrew Harnik / Getty Images)
BY AZIZA AHMED | The narrowing of options for physicians in Idaho leaves them in a bind: Do you perform an abortion that could save a woman’s life or her organs, as dictated by EMTALA, or will you face penalties under Idaho law?
Oral arguments can sometimes reveal how the justices of the Supreme Court are approaching the issue at hand. The questions asked by the justices suggest three things: a lack of clarity under Idaho law; abortion as the standard of care; and acknowledgement of fetal personhood.
(Click here to read more) [[link removed]]
Idaho’s EMTALA Challenge Has Got Women Dead to Rights [[link removed]]
[link removed] [[link removed]]
The emergency room of the Harborview Medical Center on March 9, 2022 in Seattle. In 1986, Congress enacted the Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA) to ensure public access to emergency services, regardless of ability to pay. (John Moore / Getty Images)
BY MARY ANNE FRANKS | The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Moyle v. U.S., a case that will determine whether individual states are allowed to exclude a single group from this basic protection: pregnant women.
The state of Idaho claims that it has the right to forbid pregnant women and girls—and only pregnant women and girls—from receiving emergency care that could save their lives.
(Click here to read more) [[link removed]]
If SCOTUS Restricts Emergency Abortion Care, Poor and At-Risk Populations Will Suffer Most [[link removed]]
[link removed] [[link removed]]
The Biden administration has sued Idaho, saying that state’s abortion ban violates EMTALA because its exceptions are too narrow to allow doctors to perform abortions if needed to stabilize a patient. (Catherine McQueen / Getty Images)
BY SYLVIA GHAZARIAN | Today, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in a case that will decide whether the Emergency Medical and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) will continue to require that patients be offered life saving abortion care regardless of a state’s conflicting abortion laws.
The implications for at-risk women, particularly those protected by EMTALA, cannot be ignored.
(Click here to read more) [[link removed]]
[link removed] [[link removed]] Tune in for a new episode of Ms. magazine's podcast, On the Issues with Michele Goodwin on
Apple Podcasts [[link removed]] + Spotify [[link removed]] .
In this episode, we’re joined by the indomitable Lizz Winstead with a live studio in Washington, D.C. She bares all as we talk about the new documentary featuring her and Abortion Access Front (AAF), No One Asked You. From her childhood to her own abortion story, she tells it all, including what led her to found AAF.
We hope you'll listen, subscribe, rate and review today!
[link removed] [[link removed]]
[link removed] [[link removed]]
READ THE REST [[link removed]] | GET THE MAGAZINE [[link removed]] | SUPPORT MS. [[link removed]]
[[link removed]]
[link removed] [[link removed]] [link removed] [[link removed]] [link removed] [[link removed]]
Enjoy this newsletter? Forward to a friend!
Was this email forwarded to you by a friend? Subscribe [[link removed]] .

Ms. Magazine
1600 Wilson Boulevard
Suite 801
Arlington, VA 22209
United States
Manage your email subscriptions here [[link removed]]
If you believe you received this message in error or wish to no longer receive email from us, please
unsubscribe: [link removed] .