From Freedom of the Press Foundation <[email protected]>
Subject ‘Spy draft’ bill threatens press freedom
Date April 19, 2024 8:47 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
US provides meaningless assurances in Assange case

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
Dear Friend of Press Freedom,

Here are some of the most important stories we’re following from the U.S. and around the world. If you enjoy reading this newsletter, please forward it to friends and family. If someone has forwarded you this newsletter, please subscribe here ([link removed]) .

Under a bill currently being rushed through the senate, anyone from a landlord to a laundromat could be required to help the government spy. Public domain image via flickr ([link removed]) .


** ‘Spy draft’ bill threatens press freedom
------------------------------------------------------------

The Senate is dangerously close to passing a bill that would allow intelligence agencies to essentially “institute a spy draft ([link removed]) ” and order everyone from dentists to plumbers to surveil their patients and customers’ communications.

The Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, or RISAA, would also allow the government to order commercial landlords who rent space to media outlets, or contractors who service newsrooms, to help it spy on American journalists’ ([link removed]) communications with foreign sources.

Our deputy director of advocacy, Caitlin Vogus, wrote for the Guardian ([link removed]) about the dangers of this awful bill. Advocacy Director Seth Stern, along with John Cusack, a founding board member, appealed to Senator Dick Durbin in the Chicago Sun-Times ([link removed]) (thankfully, Durbin appears to understand ([link removed]) that this bill cannot become law). We also told Rolling Stone ([link removed]) , Reason ([link removed]) , and others about the unique threat the bill poses to press
freedom.

We’re asking you to do your part to stop this bill. Call 202-899-8938 ASAP and tell your senators to VOTE NO on RISAA.

U.S. provides meaningless ‘assurances’ in Assange case

Last month, the U.K. High Court asked the U.S. ([link removed]) for “assurances” before deciding whether to allow Julian Assange’s appeal of his extradition to proceed, including an assurance that Assange, as an Australian, could defend himself using the First Amendment in a U.S. court

The U.S. this week told the British court ([link removed]) that Assange may “raise and seek to rely on” the First Amendment, but it’s up to a judge whether he actually can. That’s completely meaningless. Anyone can "raise" anything in court. The U.S. is reserving the right to argue that the First Amendment is irrelevant to Assange, who is being prosecuted under the Espionage Act for obtaining and publishing government secrets – something investigative journalists ([link removed]) do every day. The “assurance” should make journalists even more worried about how the Assange prosecution could impact press freedom in the U.S. and globally.

Time to act on American journalist held in Russia

Six months ago this week, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty journalist and American citizen Alsu Kurmasheva was detained in Russia. Like Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich ([link removed]) , Kurmasheva is being held by Vladimir Putin’s government on baseless charges, because she is a journalist.

Despite calls from news media outlets ([link removed]) and press freedom organizations ([link removed]) , including Freedom of the Press Foundation ([link removed]) (FPF), the Department of State has still not designated Kurmasheva as wrongfully detained, which would open up additional U.S. government resources dedicated to freeing her. Read more on our website ([link removed]) about Kurmasheva’s unjust detention and why the case for granting the designation has only grown stronger in the last six months.

Accountability needed for Kansas raid

Last year’s tragic ([link removed]) raid of the Marion County Record in Kansas has largely left the national headlines, but the story is not over. Investigations into the raid are ongoing ([link removed]) and news ([link removed]) continues to emerge ([link removed]) about additional evidence of Marion officials’ malicious retaliation.

Stern, FPF’s advocacy director, wrote on our website ([link removed]) about the evidence that has piled up in recent months and the need for accountability sooner rather than later. “Hopefully the delay is because authorities are figuring out just how thick of a book they can throw at those responsible for the raid,” he said.


** What we’re reading
------------------------------------------------------------

The Israeli censorship regime is growing. that needs to stop. ([link removed]) Jodie Ginsberg, head of the Committee to Protect Journalists, explains how Israel's refusal to allow the international press into Gaza, killings of journalists, and other restrictions on press freedom are preventing the public from understanding the war.

Fourth Amendment is Not For Sale Act passed the House, now it should pass the Senate ([link removed]) . Some good news during an otherwise bleak week when it comes to government surveillance: The Fourth Amendment is Not for Sale Act — a bill that would close a loophole ([link removed]) that allows the government to spy on Americans, including journalists, by buying their data — passed the House. The Senate now needs to finish the job.

NC blogger issued no-contact, no-trespass orders after confronting county attorney ([link removed]) . The order against North Carolina blogger Thom Roddy is reminiscent ([link removed]) of last year’s restraining order against an Arizona journalist for knocking on a state senator’s door. Interacting with reporters might sometimes be uncomfortable for public officials, but it’s what they signed up for. They need to have a thicker skin and respect the Constitution.
After reports about Trump jurors, judge demands restraint from the press ([link removed]) . ​​A judge has no business telling the press to “refrain from writing about anything you observe with your eyes.” If this was meant as an order, it's a blatantly unconstitutional prior restraint. Even if it was just a request, it's way out of line.


**
FPF Live
------------------------------------------------------------
On May 2 at noon ET, in honor of World Press Freedom Day, our Deputy Editor Adam Glenn will be moderating a panel discussing the intersections of press freedom and the environment, with our Deputy Director of Advocacy Caitlin Vogus, freelance journalist Carlos Berríos Polanco and Halle Parker, journalist and Society of Environmental Journalists board member. You can register here ([link removed]) .
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]

============================================================
Copyright © 2024 Freedom of the Press Foundation, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.

Our mailing address is:
Freedom of the Press Foundation
49 Flatbush Ave, #1017
Brooklyn, NY 11217
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis