From FactCheck.org <[email protected]>
Subject Trump Puts Focus on Biden's Tax Plans
Date April 19, 2024 12:29 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
View this email in your browser ([link removed])
An update from FactCheck.org
Photo by Achira22 / stock.adobe.com


** Trump Puts Focus on Biden's Tax Plans
------------------------------------------------------------

Former President Donald Trump marked Tax Day on April 15 by putting the focus on President Joe Biden's tax plans for a second term, if Biden should win reelection.

On Truth Social, Trump reminded his followers that he signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which cut taxes for most individuals and corporations. But most of the individual income tax provisions expire after next year. (For details, see our article "A Guide to the Tax Changes ([link removed]) .")

Trump warned that if Biden "gets his way, you will soon be facing colossal tax HIKES.” But as Deputy Managing Editor Rob Farley writes, Biden’s 2025 budget proposal supports extending Trump's tax cuts for individual filers earning less than $400,000 and married couples making less than $450,000. The proposal would increase taxes on wealthy individuals and corporations.

As he has in the past, Biden proposes to raise the corporate income tax rate from 21% to 28%, and to restore the top individual tax rate of 39.6% from the current rate of 37%. The budget would also increase the corporate minimum tax rate to 21% for companies that report average profits in excess of $1 billion over a three-year period. (The 2022 Inflation Reduction Act established a minimum of 15%.)

“Bottom line: Biden is promising to protect the TCJA tax cuts for at least 95 percent of households,” Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, told Rob via email.

For more, read Rob's story "Trump’s Unfounded ‘Colossal’ Tax Hike Warning ([link removed]) ."
HOW WE KNOW
In her article on the solar eclipse, FactCheck.org Fellow Hadleigh Zinsner linked to images of the eclipse from NASA's Flickr page. Many government agencies and offices -- including the White House ([link removed]) -- have Flickr accounts. We often use photos from these sites to illustrate our articles. Visit NASA's Flickr account ([link removed]) for some pretty dramatic images of the solar eclipse. Read more ([link removed]) .
FEATURED FACT
The Help America Vote Act, which became law in 2002, requires states to verify identifying information provided by newly registered voters with the states' respective motor vehicle agencies. For voters who don’t have a driver's license, the motor vehicle agency must verify the last four digits of the voter’s Social Security number with the Social Security Administration. Read more ([link removed]) .
WORTHY OF NOTE
FactCheck.org Managing Editor Lori Robertson participated in a webinar this week on misinformation as part of the Society of Professional Journalists' Ethics Week 2024 ([link removed]) , which started April 15 and ends today.

The webinar -- "Just the Facts: How to Find Your Way in a Media Ecosystem Full of Misinformation" -- was moderated by Chris Roberts ([link removed]) , an associate professor in the Department of Journalism and Creative Media at the University of Alabama. Lori was joined in the discussion by Louis Jacobson, a senior correspondent for PolitiFact.

The two fact-checking pros explained the history of FactCheck.org and PolitiFact, respectively, as well as the policies, principles and procedures they follow. Lori also provided some examples of what she called "common patterns of deceptions," including taking statements out of context, cherry-picking data and using outdated evidence.

Click here ([link removed]) to watch the video on the SPJ's YouTube channel.
REPLY ALL

Reader: What is the purpose of executive orders? Emergencies? To evade congressional process? What's a normal amount for a president?

FactCheck.org Director Eugene Kiely: The purpose of executive orders varies, but to have a legal effect each order must state its source of authority as "either the President’s powers in Article II of the Constitution or an express or implied delegation of power from Congress to the President,” as explained in a 2021 report ([link removed]) by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service.

Historically, executive orders have been used to carry out "routine administrative matters and the internal operations of federal agencies," the Department of Justice explains ([link removed]) on its website.

Executive orders can be used in emergency situations. The National Emergencies Act allows the president to declare or terminate emergencies by issuing an executive order. President Joe Biden last month issued an executive order ([link removed]) to terminate three previous executive orders that imposed sanctions on Zimbabwe and some of its government officials.

More recently, executive orders have been used more broadly to implement policy directives without congressional action, the Justice Department website says.

For example, then-President Donald Trump issued an executive order ([link removed]) days after taking office that said so-called “sanctuary jurisdictions” that “fail to comply with applicable Federal law” would not be eligible for federal funds, “except as mandated by law.” Such orders have the full force and effect of laws. But, like laws, they are also subject to legal challenges. In this case, the order was tied up in courts ([link removed]) for years until Biden took office and issued an executive order to rescind Trump's order.

Similarly, Biden signed an executive order ([link removed]) on his first day in office to create an interagency working group and require the group to take into account the “benefits of reducing climate pollution” and “the full costs of greenhouse gas emissions” in the federal decision-making process. The Supreme Court upheld the order ([link removed]) , declining to take up a challenge by the Louisiana attorney general.

As for the number of executive orders, the Federal Register makes that information available on its website ([link removed]) , dating to 1937.

To date, Biden has issued 138 executive orders, with most of them (77) issued in his first year in office. In four years, Trump issued 220 executive orders.

As for other recent presidents:
* Barack Obama issued 277 in eight years.
* George W. Bush issued 291 in eight years.
* Bill Clinton issued 361 in eight years.
* George H.W. Bush issued 166 in four years.
* Ronald Reagan issued 381 in eight years.

A big caveat to all this is that presidents may issue other presidential directives, such as proclamations and memoranda, that “may be employed to direct and govern the actions of government officials and agencies,” as explained in the CRS report.

As we wrote in 2013 ([link removed]) , Obama issued 23 “executive actions” ([link removed]) to address gun violence, including presidential memoranda “to require federal law enforcement to trace guns recovered in criminal investigations” and to direct “the Centers for Disease Control to research the causes and prevention of gun violence.” None were executive orders.


** Wrapping Up
------------------------------------------------------------

Here's what else we've got for you this week:
* "Judge Hasn’t Ruled on Trump’s Graduation Request ([link removed]) ": On the first day of his criminal fraud trial in New York, former President Donald Trump requested that the judge not hold court proceedings on May 17 — the day of his youngest son’s high school graduation. The judge did not rule on the request, saying he preferred to wait to see how the trial unfolds.
* "O.J. Simpson Died from Cancer, Not COVID-19 Vaccine ([link removed]) ": O.J. Simpson, a football star who was acquitted in the murder of his ex-wife and her friend, died of cancer on April 10 at age 76. Misinformation spread online within hours of the news. Social media posts falsely claimed that the cancer was related to his COVID-19 vaccination. Simpson was vaccinated, but there is no evidence that vaccination causes cancer or that it was to blame for his death.
* "Viral Claim Inflates Number of New Voters in Three States ([link removed]) ": A claim on social media misrepresents the number of people who have registered to vote in three states in 2024 and suggests the new voters are immigrants in the country illegally. There have been 194,000 newly registered voters in those states — not 2 million — and there’s no evidence they are immigrants in the U.S. illegally.
* "Posts Misrepresent Views of Eclipse With Composite Images ([link removed]) ": During the April 8 eclipse, people in the path of totality were able to see solar phenomena, including the sun’s corona. But social media posts have shared altered or composite images of these phenomena, claiming one image was “captured by NASA.” It was actually an artist’s rendering of a composite photo of the 2017 eclipse.

Y lo que publicamos en español ([link removed]) (English versions are accessible in each story):
* "Publicaciones plantean preocupaciones infundadas sobre el aluminio en las vacunas ([link removed]) ": Por muchas décadas se han utilizado pequeñas cantidades de aluminio para reforzar la respuesta inmunitaria a las vacunas. La exposición a altos niveles de aluminio se ha asociado a problemas cerebrales y óseos, pero no hay pruebas de que el nivel de exposición que proporcionan las vacunas provoque dicha toxicidad, al contrario de lo que se afirma en las redes sociales.

Do you like FactCheck.Weekly? Share it with a friend! They can subscribe here ([link removed]) .
Donate to Support Our Work ([link removed])

============================================================
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
We'll show up in your inbox every Friday with this fact-focused rundown. But you can message us any day of the week with questions or comments: [email protected].
Copyright © 2024 FactCheck.org, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
FactCheck.org
Annenberg Public Policy Center
202 S. 36th St.
Philadelphia, PA 19104-3806

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed][UNIQID]&c=ff9a7620f9&utm_source=FactCheck.org&utm_campaign=a9dc22caab-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2024_04_17_06_38&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-a9dc22caab-%5BLIST_EMAIL_ID%5D)
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed][UNIQID]&c=ff9a7620f9&utm_source=FactCheck.org&utm_campaign=a9dc22caab-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2024_04_17_06_38&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-a9dc22caab-%5BLIST_EMAIL_ID%5D)
.

This email was sent to [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
why did I get this? ([link removed]) unsubscribe from this list ([link removed]) update subscription preferences ([link removed])
FactCheck.org: A Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania . 202 S 36th St. . Philadelphia, Pa 19104 . USA
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis