From Daily Docket, Democracy Docket <[email protected]>
Subject 3rd Circuit blocks New Jersey’s controversial “county line” ballot design
Date April 17, 2024 10:02 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
The U.S. Supreme Court still hasn’t issued a decision on South Carolina’s congressional map.

[link removed]

Daily Docket — Wednesday, April 17

Work with us! Democracy Docket is seeking a news editor who will supervise a team of reporters in writing compelling and accurate voting rights news articles, analysis pieces, explainers and more. Apply here ([link removed]) .

Here are some updates from the U.S. Supreme Court.
* Today was another opinion day for the Supreme Court, but it did not issue a decision on South Carolina's congressional map ([link removed]) . The Court has not yet scheduled its next opinion day.
* The state Republican parties in Nebraska and New Mexico, along with a number of county GOP parties in Arizona, Georgia, Nebraska and Oregon, urged ([link removed]) the Supreme Court to take up Kari Lake’s lawsuit trying to ban voting machines in Arizona.
+ The Arizona, Delaware and Georgia Republican parties previously filed ([link removed]) amicus briefs also asking the nation’s highest court to take up the case.
* For the first time in history, the Supreme Court will decide if a president has immunity from criminal acts taken while in office. We explain what Trump is claiming in his upcoming oral argument and possible implications of the ruling. Read it here. ([link removed])

Here are some other updates from today.
* The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals blocked ([link removed]) the controversial “county line” ballot design for New Jersey’s Democratic primary elections. Voters in the state, for the first time in decades, will cast ballots with a conventional design utilized in all other states.
* Commissioners in New Hampshire's Strafford County filed ([link removed]) a lawsuit challenging the new single-member districts for their elections. The lawsuit alleges changing the election method mid-decade violates state law and the state constitution.

[link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed]

This is our free daily newsletter — help keep it that way and support ([link removed]) our work. You can upgrade ([link removed]) to our premium subscription to unlock exclusive insights, news and more. Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences ([link removed][UNIQID]&c=b3a650c307&utm_source=Democracy+Docket+Newsletters&utm_campaign=5eddf5fd1c-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2024_03_15_08_46_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-2029d74fb4-%5BLIST_EMAIL_ID%5D&mc_cid=5eddf5fd1c&mc_eid=UNIQID) or unsubscribe from this list ([link removed][UNIQID]&c=b3a650c307&utm_source=Democracy+Docket+Newsletters&utm_campaign=5eddf5fd1c-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2024_03_15_08_46_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-2029d74fb4-%5BLIST_EMAIL_ID%5D&mc_cid=5eddf5fd1c&mc_eid=UNIQID) .

This email was sent to [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
why did I get this? ([link removed]) unsubscribe from this list ([link removed]) update subscription preferences ([link removed])
Democracy Docket LLC . 250 Massachusetts Ave NW Ste 400 . Washington, DC 20001-5825 . USA
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis