Yesterday, I spoke to the media outside the New York City courthouse where
Donald Trump is on trial for election interference.

I reminded the media of some basic facts:

* When the Access Hollywood tape (“grab ’em by the p***y”) was revealed on October 7, 2016, many people
thought it would be the end of Trump’s campaign and career.

* Many Republicans debated whether they should ask Trump to drop out.

* At that moment, the prospect of another scandal emerging would likely have
been the final nail in Candidate Trump’s coffin.

* When Trump learned that an adult film actress with whom he allegedly had an
affair was prepared to make the story public, he directed that she be paid to
keep the story under wraps.

* Then Trump allegedly cooked his books, illegally, to cover up the payments.

The context here is everything.

Trump wasn’t doing this because he was embarrassed about the affair and wanted
to keep it from his family.

He was doing this to interfere with the election.

We know this, because Trump allegedly said that he hoped to delay payment until
after the election, when it wouldn’t matter if the story came out.

So we need to understand this case for what it is really about.

But the media isn’t doing that.

Because phrases like “extramarital affair” and “sex with a porn star” are too
salacious to resist, the mainstream media has, even if inadvertently, downplayed
the real impact of what Trump did.

The crimes alleged in this case may well have been the difference in Donald
Trump ultimately becoming president.

Public Citizen is calling on leading print and television news outlets to stop
using phrases like “hush money case” that diminish or obscure the true severity
of Trump’s election interference.

To ABC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, NBC, The New York Times , and The Washington Post :
[[link removed]]

The Manhattan District Attorney’s case against Donald Trump is about election
interference — and you should call it that. Donald Trump is on trial for
allegedly falsifying official business records in what turned out to be a
successful effort to improperly interfere with the 2016 presidential election.
Please stop using the misleading and trivializing shorthand “hush money case” in
your coverage and instead call it the election interference case that it is.
[[link removed]]

Click to add your name now. [[link removed]]

Thanks for taking action.

For justice and democracy,

- Robert Weissman, President of Public Citizen


Public Citizen | 1600 20th Street NW | Washington DC 20009 | Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]