We explore the proactive role philanthropy can play to address the biggest challenges in tech.

View in browser ([link removed] )

April 2, 2024 // Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up to receive your own copy here ([link removed] ) .

How philanthropy can change tech

Raffi Krikorian ([link removed] ) believes that philanthropy needs to go on the offensive to tackle the biggest and most complex problems in tech.

Instead of just reacting to today’s problems, he sees a more ambitious and risk-taking role for philanthropy to "make a dent now so that these technologies don’t further divide society.”

Krikorian, the Chief Technology Officer of Emerson Collective ([link removed] ) , is joining the advisory board ([link removed] ) of Amplica Labs ([link removed] ) , a tech company under Project Liberty’s umbrella that built the Decentralized Social Networking Protocol ([link removed] ) (DSNP).

Project Liberty spoke to Krikorian about why it’s important not just to fix the internet of today, but build an engine for innovation, research, and regulation that will drive the internet of the future.

// Bad incentives, not bad tech

Krikorian doesn’t believe that technology is inherently harmful. “I have an optimistic lens about tech. It’s actually the incentive mechanisms that drive certain behaviors” he said. “Social media has an incentive mechanism that drives engagement, which can lead to harmful content.”

His background testifies to leveraging tech for good by shaping its incentive mechanisms.

- Before he joined Emerson Collective, a philanthropic initiative launched by Laurene Powell Jobs ([link removed] ) , Krikorian held leadership roles at Twitter, where he led the global engineering team, and Uber, where he launched the company’s self-driving efforts.
- In 2016, he transitioned to the Democratic National Committee as its first-ever Chief Technology Officer where he revamped the party’s tech infrastructure.

In addition to his work leading the tech team at Emerson Collective, Krikorian hosts the Technically Optimistic podcast ([link removed] ) and newsletter ([link removed] ) , which explore technology's role in society.

//

"Philanthropy should not be stuck in the solutions of today. It should be funding the moonshots that look at what’s next over the horizon."

//

// Balance of power

If tech companies, the government, and civil society make up three legs of a stool, Krikorian sees tech companies and platforms developing technology as the most powerful leg, creating a sense of imbalance in power. But philanthropy can strengthen the other two legs too.

- Government: Philanthropy can help bolster government to create and enforce the frameworks, establish guardrails, pass legislation, and enable responsible innovation to build a better tech ecosystem. For example, philanthropically-supported Issue One ([link removed] ) , a nonprofit and inclusive democracy organization (and member of the Project Liberty Alliance ([link removed] ) ), is applying pressure on Congress through its Council for Responsible Social Media ([link removed] ) to shape policy around social media reform.
- Civil Society: Philanthropy can fund researchers, back activists, financially support nonprofits, and build a strong and independent press that holds tech to account. Bellingcat ([link removed] ) , an independent investigative collective focused on open-source research, is funded through a wide range of philanthropic initiatives that power its work to improve accountability online.

// Public-philanthropic partnerships

One of the areas that Krikorian is most excited about is scaling government initiatives that support civil society organizations and researchers. “There is no shortage of opportunities for philanthropy and government to join forces,” he said.

- One bright spot is the National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource (NAIRR ([link removed] ) ), a government initiative building a shared national research infrastructure for responsible discovery and innovation in AI. NAIRR comprises ten federal agencies and 25 non-governmental partners that provide funding to support the nation's research and education community.

// Enabling legislation

Krikorian believes it’s a mistake to interpret government regulation solely as “don’t do X.” Effective government regulations enable as much as they restrict. “We could have moonshot prizes for responsible social media or AI development that could drive innovation. It’s hard for government to create something new, but can philanthropy create proof-of-concepts and pilots that the government can pour a large amount of money into?”

- One example is the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act ([link removed] ) , which is designed to drive more domestic semiconductor manufacturing. We could apply similar enabling regulations and laws in the responsible tech space.
- The XPRIZE Foundation ([link removed] ) is one such moonshot challenge that directs philanthropic funding to support breakthrough research and innovation.

// Strengthening the research that drives accountability

In citing how research can drive government action, Krikorian mentioned the example of the fight against big tobacco in the US ([link removed] ) . There wasn’t meaningful progress until there was sound research about the health outcomes of smoking, and he believes the same could be true with the harms caused by social media and AI. As the research becomes less driven by the tech companies themselves and more independent, governments at all levels will be compelled to pass legislation.

“We need better transparency about what’s going on in platforms, and philanthropy could fund researchers and set up legal defense funds for those who are doing this work,” he said.

- For example, Krikorian highlighted Distributed AI Research Institute ([link removed] ) (DAIR), an organization founded by Timnit Gebru who led Google’s Ethical AI research team before she was fired in 2020. DAIR is pioneering a new approach to AI innovation and research.
- RadicalxChange ([link removed] ) , another nonprofit relying on philanthropic support and a member of the Project Liberty Alliance, tests and pilots new research models for digital governance and online movement building.

// Protocols & digital infrastructure

As a new advisory board member of Amplica Labs, Krikorian will support innovations at the protocol level, like DSNP ([link removed] ) . He sees initiatives like DSNP as foundational technology that allows people to innovate and build a more distributed and democratized web.

But he conceded that it’s hard to get people excited about digital infrastructure like new protocols—even if they reimagine digital rights and ownership.

His experience working for the Democratic National Committee taught him that to inspire people to fund the foundational building blocks of a movement, you need to paint a picture of what that infrastructure enables—to show the human-centered outcomes and benefits that happen when you invest at levels and layers that can feel abstract or hidden.

But this is the core of what philanthropy should be doing, Krikorian emphasized: investing in new ideas, unproven concepts, critical digital infrastructure, and alternatives to the status quo that can feel abstract or non-obvious, but will transform the web.

“Philanthropy should not be stuck in the solutions of today. It should be funding the moonshots that look at what’s next over the horizon.”

Other notable headlines

// 💵 Congress has approved more funding to study technology’s impact on children’s development and mental health, according to an article in The Washington Post ([link removed] ) .

// 🖥 An article in The Atlantic ([link removed] ) argued that it wasn’t social media that killed the web, but browsers.

// 👩‍⚖️ The AI industry is heading towards a legal iceberg. An article in The Wall Street Journal ([link removed] ) suggested that tech companies will be liable for the things their AIs say and do.

// 🚺 A podcast on Tech Policy Press ([link removed] ) interviewed Lucy Purdon, the author of a new report about the tech backlash against women’s rights.

// 🇨🇦 Four Canadian school boards are suing TikTok, Meta, and Snapchat for disrupting the learning process and harming the education system, according to an article in Axios ([link removed] ) .

// 🤔 Tech companies are enlisting you to be unpaid lobbyists. An article in the Washington Post ([link removed] ) wondered if that’s ethical.

Partner news & opportunities

// New report on how to design for children in the digital environment

5Rights Foundation ([link removed] ) has released a new report in collaboration with the Digital Futures for Children Center that explores how to determine what’s in the best interests for children in digital environments. Download it here ([link removed] ) .

// Virtual event on smartphones & the youth mental health crisis

April 9th at 7pm ET

Mothers Against Media Addiction ([link removed] ) (MAMA) will host author Dr. Lisa Damour for a conversation on how parents can help protect kids from media addiction. Register for your free ticket here ([link removed] ) .

// Virtual event on media use, attention, & distraction

April 10th at 12pm ET

Children and Screens ([link removed] ) is hosting a webinar with author, Nicholas Carr, on new research into the complexities of focus, attention, and cognitive development of young people. Register here ([link removed] ) .

What did you think of today's newsletter?

We'd love to hear what you thought of today's newsletter. Reply to this email with:

- Feedback for how we can make this newsletter better
- Ideas for future editions
- A recommendation of someone we should interview

/ Project Liberty Foundation is advancing responsible development of the internet, designed and governed for the common good. /

Thank you for reading.

Facebook ([link removed] )

LinkedIn ([link removed] )

X Logo (formerly Twitter) ([link removed] )

Instagram ([link removed] )

PLslashes_logo_green ([link removed] )

501 W 30th Street, Suite 40A,

New York, New York, 10001

Unsubscribe ([link removed] ) Manage Preferences ([link removed] )

© 2023 Project Liberty