[[link removed]]

THE BIDEN NETANYAHU RIFT  
[[link removed]]


 

Danny Postel and Lisa Goldman
March 26, 2024
New Lines Magazine
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ Is the Israeli-American ‘special relationship’ in danger, or
are the two leaders merely playing a game of political survival? _

,

 

THIS WEEK’S DIPLOMATIC CONTRETEMPS BETWEEN THE ISRAELI AND AMERICAN
governments is being described as the worst rupture in the “special
relationship” in decades. In 1962 President John F. Kennedy remarked
to Golda Meir (then Israel’s foreign minister) that America’s bond
with the Jewish state was comparable only to the one the U.S. shared
with Britain.

On Monday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu canceled the trip
of a delegation of top officials that was set to go to Washington over
the Biden administration’s abstention on a U.N. Security Council
resolution calling for an immediate cease-fire in Gaza and hostage
release, which cleared the path for the resolution’s adoption.
Israel has long relied on its American ally to veto U.N. resolutions
it dislikes and sees the abstention as a betrayal.

“This constitutes a clear departure from the consistent U.S.
position in the Security Council since the beginning of the war,”
Netanyahu said. 

In Israel, the legacy media that represents the center-right and
liberal political spectrum reported the rift as Netanyahu’s fault
and a dangerous development for the country’s security. On Monday
night the main headline on Haaretz’s Hebrew homepage read, “Just
Another Day at the Office: Instead of Attacking Rafah, Netanyahu
Attacked the U.S.” The newspaper’s follow-up editorial, which was
translated for the English edition, is headlined: “Netanyahu Has
Become Israel’s Agent of Destruction.”

Amit Segal, the influential political commentator for Channel 12,
Israel’s most popular commercial network, said that Netanyahu made a
decision that was “bad for Israel.” Segal, who grew up in a West
Bank settlement, has for years been associated with center-right
views, with liberal Israels accusing him on social media of being a
shill for Netanyahu. Now it seems that Segal, too, is turning away
from the prime minister. 

While the Israeli press sees the widening rift with the U.S. for what
it is, the White House is playing it down, retorting that Netanyahu is
attempting to stoke a crisis in Israeli-American relations where there
is none. “The prime minister’s office seems to be indicating
through public statements that we somehow changed here,” White House
national security spokesman John Kirby commented. “Nothing could be
further from the truth. We still have Israel’s back.” Driving the
point home, Kirby told journalists at Monday’s White House briefing,
“As you and I are speaking, we are still providing tools and
capabilities, weapons systems, so that Israel can defend itself.”

Yet something has changed. For months, Biden has been quietly —
critics would say meekly and fancifully — urging Israel to end its
assault on Gaza, all the while providing the weapons for Israel to
continue that very offensive. Yet the threatened assault on Rafah has
proved a step too far, even for an exceptionally accommodating
American administration.

THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION IS TORN BETWEEN AN AGING WASHINGTON CONSENSUS
ON ISRAEL AND A YOUNGER GENERATION OF DEMOCRATIC PARTY POLITICIANS AND
ACTIVISTS. IT IS TORN, TOO, BETWEEN AN ISRAELI PRIME MINISTER
UNWILLING TO LISTEN TO WASHINGTON AND A PRESIDENT UNWILLING TO
CRITICIZE ISRAEL TOO STRONGLY IN AN ELECTION YEAR.

But the Security Council resolution and the cancellation of the
Israeli visit to Washington are not isolated incidents. The Biden-Bibi
relationship has been deteriorating for months over the Israeli prime
minister’s refusal to heed the White House’s increasingly strong
suggestions that the Israeli military wrap up its campaign in Gaza. In
November, the Biden administration announced a ban on Israeli
“extremists [who have attacked] civilians in the West Bank” from
entering the U.S. In February it imposed financial sanctions on a
group of settlers, and this month it levied sanctions on two West Bank
settlements — the first time the U.S. has ever taken measures
against an entire Israeli settlement in occupied Palestinian
territory. In February Biden issued a presidential memorandum
conditioning military support to Israel on the delivery of
humanitarian aid to civilians.

The photograph of the two men wrapped in a bear hug immediately after
the attacks on Oct. 7 of last year now looks like a dusty souvenir
from the distant past. On more than one occasion, Biden has called
Netanyahu an “asshole,” several sources “directly familiar with
his comments” recently told MSNBC, inspiring the Politico headline,
“From ‘I Love You’ to ‘Asshole’: How Joe Gave Up on Bibi.”

Biden is certainly not the first U.S. president to harbor such
feelings toward the longest-serving prime minister in Israel’s
history. An exasperated Bill Clinton privately quipped after his first
meeting with Netanyahu in 1996, “Who the fuck does he think he is?
Who’s the fucking superpower here?” Neither was Barack Obama
exactly fond of Netanyahu. When Obama’s French counterpart Nicolas
Sarkozy confessed in a hot-mic moment in 2011, “I can’t stand
[Netanyahu]. He’s a liar,” Obama replied, “You’re tired of him
— what about me? I have to deal with him every day.”

But the Biden-Netanyahu relationship is different. Biden has called
Netanyahu a “close, personal friend of over 33 years” and once
inscribed a photo for the Israeli leader with the words: “Bibi, I
don’t agree with a damn thing you say, but I love you.” So the
nosedive from what was once a political bromance seems freighted and
has observers speculating about what’s driving it — and where it
might end.

In Israel a common opinion holds that Netanyahu has a cynical interest
in prolonging the war to avoid having to call an election that he
would likely lose. Chuck Schumer’s much-discussed call for Netanyahu
to step down — a call that Biden quickly echoed — must be sticking
in the embattled Israeli leader’s craw, not least because the Senate
majority leader, a Jewish Democrat, has long been one of Israel’s
most ardent supporters in American politics. In an interview for the
New York Times published March 19, he took congressional correspondent
Annie Karni to his old Brooklyn high school, which had a majority
Jewish student body when he attended in the 1960s. Schumer reminisced
about walking the school’s corridors during the 1967 Six-Day War
with a transistor radio “glued” to his ear. He goes on to describe
growing up in the shadow of the Holocaust in Jewish Brooklyn, where he
acquired his love for Israel and the Jewish people. When describing
his connection to these two entities he uses the Hebrew/Yiddish word
“neshama” (soul).

Schumer says that he once had a warm relationship with Netanayhu, but
no more. Now he believes that Netanyahu is harming the Jewish people
and the state of Israel — hence his precedent-making March 17
speech, delivered from the Senate floor, in which he called upon
Israelis to vote Netanyahu out of office “when the war winds
down.” The prime minister, said Schumer, is an “impediment to
peace.” To Karni, he said his point was that “you can still love
Israel and feel strongly about Israel and totally disagree with Bibi
Netanyahu and the policies of Israel.”

Biden later told reporters that he thought Schumer gave “a good
speech.” 

In calling, via Schumer, for Netanyahu’s ouster by election, the
White House is gambling that Benny Gantz, a retired army general and
former minister of defense who sits in the war cabinet, would win by a
significant margin and be able to form a stable coalition. Biden
surely knows that all the polls since Oct. 7 show Gantz’s Blue and
White alliance winning. But Dahlia Scheindlin, a prominent pollster
and author of “The Crooked Timber of Democracy in Israel: Promise
Unfulfilled” (2023), urges caution. “Not only is there a
possibility of Gantz winning the next election and forming a coalition
— that is the most likely scenario, if the election were held
soon,” she told _New Lines_.

But, she added, “no one can predict” when there will be an
election.  Netanyahu is not obligated to call one until early 2025.
Moreover, three months must elapse between calling and holding an
election. A lot, Scheindlin pointed out, can happen in three months.
Meanwhile, Gideon Saar, who heads a party called New Hope, resigned
from the governing coalition on March 25 over Netanyahu’s refusal to
include him in the war cabinet, with Saar accusing Netanyahu of
strategic failures in Gaza. But even with Saar’s departure the prime
minister still heads a stable coalition of 64 seats in the 120-seat
Knesset — three more than the required minimum of 61. In other
words, Netanyahu could quite easily stay in power for another year at
least. 

The White House must also surely know that one of the most significant
aspects of Netanyahu’s 15 years as prime minister is the almost
complete decimation of Israel’s political left, in tandem with the
rise of the once-marginal far-right parties headed by Bezalel Smotrich
and Itamar Ben-Gvir. When Netanyahu brought the two men into his
governing coalition, the center was horrified and the moderate right
was distinctly uneasy. Both men are vocal racists who have long
histories of incitement to political violence and little respect for
democratic norms. But while Ben-Gvir with his swaggering fascism might
once have seemed at the very least like bad PR for Israel, since Oct.
7 the discourse has shifted. The Hamas attacks are widely perceived in
Israel as having broad support among Palestinians, which has allowed
Ben-Gvir’s narrative to seep into mainstream political discourse.
The crass and vulgar messenger might be repulsive to most Israelis,
but less so his message. The rise of the far right is thus a wild card
that could further complicate the Biden administration’s gamble in
trying to dislodge Netanyahu. Instead of Gantz, Netanyahu could be
replaced by someone to his right.

BUT WHAT IF NETANYAHU IS PLAYING THE SAME GAME, hoping to damage Biden
by promoting the perception that he has abandoned Israel, thus tilting
the scales toward Donald Trump in November? This would hardly be his
first rodeo. In 2012, the Israeli leader controversially intervened in
U.S. electoral politics — a taboo up to that point — by openly
supporting Mitt Romney over Obama (whose vice president and running
mate was one Joe Biden). Netanyahu was thrilled with Trump’s
approach to Israel during his presidency, in particular his scuttling
of the Iran nuclear deal (a signature foreign-policy achievement of
the Obama/Biden White House) and his recognition of Jerusalem as
Israel’s capital. There’s also the emotional affinity between the
two men: their shared authoritarian “strongman” personalities.

That’s how Khaled Elgindy, author of “Blind Spot: America and the
Palestinians, From Balfour to Trump” (2019) and director of the
Program on Palestine and Palestinian-Israeli Affairs at the Middle
East Institute in Washington, sees it. “Netanyahu is most definitely
trying to undermine Biden and tilt the scales toward Trump,” he told
_New Lines_. “He understands that Israel has lost the Democratic
Party, most likely for good, and that the GOP is more unconditional in
its support for Israel than even Biden and without any of the pretense
about caring for civilians.”

But Biden is also being pulled in the opposite direction, with
millions of young Americans alienated by the administration’s
handling of the Gaza war thus far and with the “uncommitted”
protest vote within the Democratic Party gaining traction and a
general election that will likely be decided by a razor-thin margin.
In the critical swing state of Michigan, which Biden won in 2020 but
Trump won in 2016, more than 100,000 voters cast “uncommitted”
ballots in the Democratic primary last month. Wisconsin, which Biden
won by just 20,682 votes in 2020, has a primary next month and Gaza is
a major issue.

Biden is feeling the heat, and not just from Arab and Muslim Americans
and young progressives. Earlier this month, a group of Democratic
donors as well as other movers and shakers in the party sent a widely
discussed letter to the Biden campaign warning that anger over the war
in Gaza and Biden’s stance toward Israel is “increasing the
chances of a Trump victory.” 

The Biden administration is torn between an aging Washington consensus
on Israel and a younger generation of Democratic Party politicians and
activists. It is torn, too, between an Israeli prime minister
unwilling to listen to Washington and a president unwilling to
criticize Israel too strongly in an election year. And torn perhaps
most of all between the desire to maintain the American alliance with
Israel and the open anger of most of the world over the war in Gaza.

* Biden; Netanyahu; US and Israel; US Foreign Policy;
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]
Manage subscription
[[link removed]]
Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]