States celebrate Sunshine Week with … anti-transparency bills?

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
Dear Friend of Press Freedom,

Here are some of the most important stories we’re following from the U.S. and around the world. If you enjoy reading this newsletter, please forward it to friends and family. If someone has forwarded you this newsletter, please subscribe here ([link removed]) .

On Monday, the Supreme Court considered just how far the government can go to influence decisions by media companies to moderate content or publish information. Fred Schilling, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States


** Invoking ‘classified information’ doesn’t suspend the First Amendment
------------------------------------------------------------

Most ([link removed]) analyses of Monday’s Supreme Court argument in Murthy v. Missouri ([link removed]) , the case about government pressure on social media content moderation, agree ([link removed]) that the justices are likely to rule that the government can influence platforms’ moderation decisions.

But when it comes to alleged threats to “national security,” some justices seemed willing to let the government go even further by coercing — or even requiring — takedowns.

It would be incredibly dangerous for the Supreme Court to allow the government greater leeway to coerce platforms to not publish classified information or other materials it claims would harm national security. It would also contradict landmark First Amendment decisions like the Pentagon Papers ([link removed]) case and create a troubling precedent for the prosecution ([link removed]) of Julian Assange and for journalists who report on classified materials. Read more on our website ([link removed]) .

PRESS Act push continues

Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) Executive Director Trevor Timm appeared this week on Chris Cuomo’s show ([link removed]) on NewsNation to explain why the PRESS Act — the bill that would help end government surveillance of journalists — is the most important press freedom bill in modern history.

Timm explained that journalists “make their bread and butter by making confidences with their sources.” Without the PRESS Act, the public will continue missing out on news because sources “don't know if they're going to be under investigation" for talking to reporters.

FPF also wrote two recent op-eds, in The Gazette in Cedar Rapids, Iowa ([link removed]) , and the Shreveport Times in Louisiana ([link removed]) , explaining why Sens. Chuck Grassley and John Kennedy should support the PRESS Act to further their legacies as defenders of the First Amendment.

States ‘celebrate’ Sunshine Week with anti-transparency bills

The annual celebration of government openness and public records known as Sunshine Week ([link removed]) may be over, but journalists’ fight for transparency continues.

To honor this year’s Sunshine Week, we published a new analysis ([link removed]) by U.S. Press Freedom Tracker Senior Reporter Stephanie Sugars about the costs of agencies’ pointless battles against records requests. We also hosted an X Space ([link removed]) on the same topic with Sugars and David Cuillier, director of the Freedom of Information Project at the Brechner Center for the Advancement of the First Amendment ([link removed]) .

But some states took a different and sickeningly ironic approach to marking Sunshine Week, by trying to crack down on the public’s access to government records and meetings. Read more here ([link removed]) about the worst offenders — New Jersey, Colorado, and California — and one ray of hope from New York.


** What we’re reading
------------------------------------------------------------

US reportedly considering plea deal offer for Julian Assange ([link removed]) . Obtaining and publishing classified documents from sources isn't "mishandling," it's journalism. If Julian Assange chooses to take a plea deal to end his imprisonment, we certainly can't blame him for that decision (although his lawyers say they have no indication an offer is on the table). But he never should've been put in this position in the first place.

Drone footage raises questions about Israeli justification for deadly strike on Gaza journalists ([link removed]) . An incredibly deep dive from The Washington Post examines an Israeli missile strike targeting a car carrying four Palestinian journalists, killing two members of an Al Jazeera crew in January. The strike needs to be thoroughly investigated and, unless it’s credibly proven that the Post somehow got this entirely wrong, all those involved need to be held accountable.

Our government’s quiet war on press freedom ([link removed]) . At a moment when the U.S. media is particularly vulnerable, the federal government continues pursuing a multifront attack on press freedom. That includes the cases of Julian Assange ([link removed]) , Tim Burke ([link removed]) , and Catherine Herridge ([link removed]) .
Cops and judges can't get away with violating reporters' First Amendment rights ([link removed]) . An illegal warrant and gag order against an independent news outlet in San Francisco were eventually voided, but officials should’ve known better from the outset. It’s inexcusable that cops and judges understand so little about the First Amendment.
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]

============================================================
Copyright © 2024 Freedom of the Press Foundation, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.

Our mailing address is:
Freedom of the Press Foundation
49 Flatbush Ave, #1017
Brooklyn, NY 11217
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.