Take a closer look at state requirements on independent expenditure and electioneering communication disclaimers.
------------------------------------------------------------

Welcome to _The Disclosure Digest_, a weekly look at state and federal disclosure policies for nonprofit organizations and their donors.

_Ballotpedia is covering the effects of the ongoing coronavirus pandemic on politics, government, and elections. Click here ([link removed]) for the latest resources on this rapidly evolving story._



** POLICY UNDER REVIEW: DONOR DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR POLITICAL AD DISCLAIMERS
------------------------------------------------------------

Last month ([link removed]) , we explored donor disclosure requirements for non-PAC entities making independent expenditures. This week, we examine donor disclosure requirements on independent expenditure and electioneering communication disclaimers.

AN INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE IS AN ADVERTISEMENT THAT EXPLICITLY ADVOCATES FOR THE ELECTION OR DEFEAT OF A CLEARLY IDENTIFIED POLITICAL CANDIDATE. An independent expenditure originates outside of a candidate's own election organization and is not coordinated with that candidate's campaign, authorized candidate committee, or political party committee. Because these advertisements explicitly advocate for or against a candidate, they are a form of express advocacy ([link removed]) .

AN ELECTIONEERING COMMUNICATION IS ANY BROADCAST, CABLE, OR SATELLITE TRANSMISSION THAT REFERS TO A CLEARLY IDENTIFIED CANDIDATE WITHIN A SPECIFIED TIME PERIOD PRECEDING A PRIMARY OR GENERAL ELECTION. Although electioneering communications refer to a specific candidate, they do not explicitly advocate for that candidate’s election or defeat. This makes an electioneering communication a form of issue advocacy ([link removed]) .

Individuals, corporations, labor unions, and select nonprofits (such as 501(c)(4) groups) can make both independent expenditures and electioneering communications.

Independent expenditures and electioneering communications must generally include a disclaimer identifying the individual or entity sponsoring the advertisement. Seven states establish donor disclosure requirements for these disclaimers. This means that, under select circumstances, the entities sponsoring independent expenditures and/or electioneering communications must disclose identifying information about their donors. These states are shaded in green on the map below. Further details about the requirements in each are provided below the map.

* CALIFORNIA: Identification of donors who gave $50,000 or more to the sponsor.

* Statutory citation: California Government Code, Sections 84503 ([link removed])

* CONNECTICUT: Identification of the top five donors who made the largest aggregate covered transfers to the sponsor in the 12-month period immediately preceding the primary or election (applies to independent expenditures made during the 90-day period immediately preceding a primary or election).

* A covered transfer is defined as "any donation, transfer, or payment of funds by a person to another person if the person receiving the donation, transfer, or payment makes independent expenditures or transfers funds to another person who makes independent expenditures."
* Statutory citation: General Statutes of Connecticut, Section 9-621(h)(1) ([link removed])

* HAWAII: Identification of the top three donors who gave $10,000 or more to the sponsor for the purpose of funding the communication.

* Statutory citation: Hawaii Revised Statutes, Section 11-393 ([link removed])

* MAINE: Identification of the top three donors who gave $1,000 or more to the sponsor since the most recent general election (applies to all independent expenditures costing more than $250).

* Statutory citation: Maine Revised Statutes, Section 1014 ([link removed])

* RHODE ISLAND: Identification of the top five donors who made the largest total donations in the 12-month period preceding the date of the advertisement (applies to 501(c) entities).

* Statutory citation: Rhode Island General Laws, Section 17-25.3 ([link removed])

* SOUTH DAKOTA: Identification of the top five donors who made the largest total donations to the sponsor in the 12-month period preceding the advertisement.

* Statutory citation: South Dakota Codified Laws, Section 12-27-16 ([link removed])

* WASHINGTON: Identification of the top five donors who made the largest total contributions exceeding $700 in the 12-month period preceding the advertisement.

* Statutory citation: Revised Code of Washington, Section 42.17A.320 ([link removed])

POLITICAL CONTEXT: Six of these seven states are Democratic trifectas. The seventh, South Dakota, is a Republican trifecta.


------------------------------------------------------------

[link removed]

------------------------------------------------------------


** THE BIG PICTURE
------------------------------------------------------------


** _NUMBER OF RELEVANT BILLS BY STATE_
------------------------------------------------------------

We're currently tracking 45 pieces of legislation dealing with donor disclosure. On the map below, a darker shade of green indicates a greater number of relevant bills. Click here ([link removed]) for a complete list of all the bills we're tracking.


** _NUMBER OF RELEVANT BILLS BY CURRENT LEGISLATIVE STATUS_
------------------------------------------------------------


** _NUMBER OF RELEVANT BILLS BY PARTISAN STATUS OF SPONSOR(S)_
------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------


** RECENT LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS
------------------------------------------------------------

No legislative actions have been taken on relevant bills since our last issue.
------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for reading! Let us know what you think! Reply to this email with any feedback or recommendations.

============================================================

BALLOTPEDIA DEPENDS ON THE SUPPORT OF OUR READERS.

The Lucy Burns Institute, publisher of Ballotpedia, is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. All donations are tax deductible to the extent of the law. Donations to the Lucy Burns Institute or Ballotpedia do not support any candidates or campaigns.


** Click here to support our work ([link removed])


-------------------------
_Copyright © 2020, All rights reserved._

OUR MAILING ADDRESS IS:

Ballotpedia
8383 Greenway Blvd
Suite 600
Middleton, WI 53562
** unsubscribe from all emails ( [link removed] )
** update subscription preferences ( [link removed] )