Dear John,
Today, The Sentencing Project released a new report, “Protect and Redirect: America’s Growing Movement to Divert Youth Out of the Justice System,” which describes reforms implemented in 23 states and eight localities across the country to expand and improve the use of diversion as an alternative to arrest or formal prosecution in juvenile court.
Research shows that addressing adolescent misbehavior outside of the justice system through diversion typically yields better outcomes: youth who are diverted from the justice system are far less likely to be arrested for subsequent offenses and far more likely to succeed in education and employment than comparable youth who are arrested and prosecuted in juvenile court. Greater and more targeted use of diversion has also shown promise to reduce the persistent racial and ethnic disparities that pervade youth justice systems.
The report describes a host of promising diversion reforms that have been implemented by states and local youth justice systems: -
Kansas, Michigan, New Hampshire, Utah, and Washington, as well as Harris County (Houston), TX and Ramsey County (St. Paul), MN have created new laws, programs, or pathways to increase the use of diversion. Additionally, Connecticut, Idaho, North Dakota, and Clark County (Las Vegas), NV have embraced reforms to steer lower-risk youth with significant human service needs away from the justice system.
- Kentucky, New York, and several counties in Iowa and
Pennsylvania have been leaders in efforts to address longstanding racial and ethnic disparities in diversion by undertaking comprehensive reviews to identify and address problematic practices that have been causing diversion disparities, and by revising diversion-related policies that often disadvantage youth of color.
-
Improve diversion practices and increase the success of youth once diverted. For instance:
- Colorado, Minnesota, and
Nebraska have expanded the use of restorative justice as an alternative to formal court involvement;
- Florida and
Los Angeles County, CA have embraced reforms to substantially increase the use of pre-arrest diversion, which is even more effective than diversion from court following an arrest; and
- Kansas,
Kentucky, and South Dakota, as well as Santa Cruz County, CA and
Davidson County (Nashville), TN have been leaders in providing support to diverted youth or taking other steps to minimize the share of youth who are returned to court for noncompliance with diversion.
- Colorado, Indiana, Massachusetts, and Utah are among the states that have taken action to improve the collection and sharing of data to better inform diversion policies and programs.
It is gratifying to see the youth justice field awakening to the importance of diversion in lieu of arrest and formal court processing, and to see legislatures across the country support greater use of diversion. We hope to see this momentum accelerate in the years to come. |
