Pushing Back Against Soft-On-Crime Policies
This week provided a lot of opportunities to push back on the Majority?s soft-on-crime policies.
On Monday we had a press conference calling on Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty to resign after her office ignored a use-of-force expert that found no criminal conduct in the Trooper Ryan Londregan case, as reported here by the Star Tribune.
I also introduced a bill, HF 4970, that would allow city attorney?s to prosecute cases the Hennepin County Attorney declines to prosecute.? I don?t expect this authority would used regularly, as it is expensive for city?s to take on these cases, but it does give cities an option to pursue justice in cases the county attorney declines, such as happened in Maple Grove when she declined to pursue felony assault charges after an officer was dragged 40 yards.
Yesterday, House Republicans tried to declare an urgency to pass a bill which would increase the penalty for straw purchases of guns from a gross misdemeanor to a felony.? ?This is something we have been fighting for since 2019 and have offered in Committee and on the floor dozens of times.? You can view my floor speech here.
This issue came to the fore again this week when it was reported that the man who shot and killed the Burnsville officers used a gun that had been obtained through a straw purchaser. The language to make it a felony to knowingly buy or give a gun to a prohibited person, such as a felon, was actually passed with strong bipartisan support in the House last year but then was stripped out in Conference Committee by the Majority and did not become law.
As noted in my floor speech, the ATF and law enforcement have been asking us to increase the penalties for straw purchases to make it more likely these cases will actually get prosecuted.? It is a common-sense step we can take to reduce gun violence in our communities.
The Majority voted against the urgency yesterday, but I hope the bill will still be considered this session or that we can add it as a floor amendment.?
Unfortunately, the DFL Majority seems to be going in the opposite direction ? supporting policies that reduce penalties for crime rather than increasing them.? ?HF 4277 proposes a study to eliminate the mandatory minimum sentences for felons caught illegally possessing firearms.? Here?s a KSTP article that provides more detail.?
Finally, the DFL has also introduced HF 3480, which would extend the age for Juvenile Court from age 16-21 and count ?individuals aged 16 to 20 who are alleged to have committed murder in first degree? in the definition of delinquent child.? These soft-on-juvenile-crime policies are not compassionate and do not provide justice for victims.?
?
|