From ProPublica’s Jill Shepherd <[email protected]>
Subject Investigating TurboTax for over a decade
Date March 14, 2024 11:07 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Independent journalism powered by the people

Image: ProPublica Spring Member Drive: Protect journalism that gets results <[link removed]>

Hi Reader,

Back in 2013, ProPublica reported <[link removed]> that Intuit, the maker of TurboTax, had successfully lobbied to stop the IRS from creating an easy way for millions of taxpayers to file online for free (a service many other countries provide). Instead, the IRS struck a deal with Intuit and other for-profit tax preparation companies to offer their products for free to qualifying taxpayers, while the government pledged not to create its own competing system.

In 2019, as Intuit was lobbying Congress to make this agreement permanent, ProPublica exposed <[link removed]> how TurboTax was using deceptive design and misleading tactics to steer low-income filers to paid versions of its service even though they were eligible to file for free. This shady behavior worked. Only a tiny percentage of eligible taxpayers actually used the free products offered through the deal with the government. Our investigation spurred public outcry, federal and state investigations, lawsuits and more. The IRS announced major reforms <[link removed]> to its agreement with the tax prep software industry, more than 4 million people received refunds from Intuit as part of a $141 million settlement <[link removed]>, and this year, the IRS is testing its own pilot program <[link removed]> covering 12 states.

As for TurboTax and its advertising, you’ve probably seen less usage of the word “free” this year. In January, the Federal Trade Commission released <[link removed]>a 93-page opinion excoriating Intuit for what it called years of widespread “deceptive” advertising for the company’s tax-filing software. The FTC ordered the company to take specific actions to fix its ads. For its part, Intuit said it planned to appeal the order and stated that the company “has always been clear, fair, and transparent with its customers.”

In a statement, Sam Levine, the director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, said that the order was intended to send a message to all companies: “‘Free’ means free — not ‘free for a few’ or ‘free for some.’ Businesses can expect an FTC enforcement action if they harness the power of ‘free’ in the dishonest way Intuit did.”

This decadelong investigation <[link removed]> shows how powerful and wide-reaching journalism can be when published in the public interest.

Help us continue this critical work by joining us today with your donation of any amount. Journalism for the people is also powered by the people, and we’re counting on you to stand with us. <[link removed]>

Thanks so much, Jill Shepherd Proud ProPublican <[link removed]>

Donate to ProPublica <[link removed]>

ProPublica is a 501(c)3 and our EIN is 14-2007220. ProPublica is a nonprofit, and we get the bulk of our funding from individuals like you. Hence, these requests for donations. Prefer not to get these emails? No problem, unsubscribe from only solicitation emails here: [link removed][]=Do+Not+Solicit. Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. This email was sent to [email protected]. Unsubscribe from these emails or update your email preferences. <%%email_preference_center_13%%> ProPublica • 155 Ave of the Americas, 13th Floor • New York, NY 10013 • 917-512-0252 <a href="[link removed]><img src="[link removed]" alt="" border="0" /></a>

If you believe this has been sent to you in error, please click <[link removed]> to safely unsubscribe.
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis