| |  | | This week: The Briefing, Vol. XII, Issue 11 | | Why are liberal commentators so upset over last week's unanimous ruling, which pretty much everyone else saw coming, that Donald Trump could not be arbitrarily thrown off the ballot by random state election officials or judges? For some people, punditry in the Trump era is a revenge fantasy, not an analytical exercise. Also: Adam Schiff exploits California's badly-designed top-two primary system. | | – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – | Week's Outlook
None are so blind: We’ve all seen this movie before. And you’d think the parties involved would have learned.
But of course, they didn’t learn. They still haven’t.
Ever since the rise of Donald Trump, liberals have become conspicuously invested in various public forms of wish-fulfillment. In 2017 and 2018, they thoroughly convinced themselves that Trump and his campaigners had colluded with agents of the Russian Federation to win the 2016 election. They were so convinced that they nearly lost their minds when Robert Mueller’s 2019 report came out finding no evidence of any such collusion. This not only dashed their dreams, but rendered worthless most of the commentary they had spent their time generating and listening to over the first two years of Trump’s administration. Rachel Maddow’s career might never recover.
Well, it just happened again. Except that this time, the repudiation comes in the form of a unanimous Supreme Court decision -- precisely the ... | | | Copyright © 2024 Conservative Intelligence Newsletter
PO Box 952, Grandville, MI 49468
Click Here to unsubscribe from the Conservative Intel Newsletter.
To Unsubscribe by email, please reply to this message with "Unsubscribe" as the Subject Line. Click Here to unsubscribe from all communication.
You can read our Privacy Policy Here | |
