View this post on the web at [link removed]

Supreme Court Temporarily Halts Texas’ Border Security Measure
The U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals had stayed the district court ruling earlier in the day.
Sydnie Henry [ [link removed] ] | Texas Scorecard | 3-4-2024
Following a U.S. District Court ruling last week that halted Texas from enforcing its new border security measure, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the lower court’s decision—allowing the law to take effect.
The Supreme Court, however, quickly moved to halt implementation of the law until at least March 13, following an emergency request from the Department of Justice.
Texas had immediately appealed U.S. District Court Judge David Alan Ezra’s ruling [ [link removed] ] Thursday in favor of the federal government.
While a panel of Fifth Circuit judges granted [ [link removed] ] Texas’ request for an administrative stay, they also granted the federal government’s request to stay Texas’ enforcement of the new measure for 7 days, so that federal attorneys could appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. 
The law in question— Senate Bill 4 [ [link removed] ]—creates a new state crime for entering Texas illegally and authorizes Texas law enforcement to arrest and prosecute those who cross the border illegally anywhere in Texas. 
It was originally set to take effect on March 5. 
Gov. Greg Abbott celebrated [ [link removed] ] the original 5th Circuit ruling, posting on X, “Law enforcement officers in Texas are now authorized to arrest & jail any illegal immigrants crossing the border,” but adding, “Obviously this is the case unless the Supreme Court intervenes by March 9.”
“I’m very pleased that the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals granted a temporary administrative stay blocking the issuance of a temporary injunction issued by a U.S District Court in Austin, Texas, prohibiting the enforcement of SB 4,” State Rep. David Spiller [ [link removed] ] (R-Jacksboro), the House Sponsor for SB 4, told Texas Scorecard. “In my opinion, the preliminary injunction should not have been granted because the DOJ failed to prove that they were likely to succeed on the merits and that the implementation of SB 4 would have inflicted irreparable harm to the United States – both requisite steps for the issuance of a temporary injunction.”
“I believe SB 4 is completely constitutional because it is not in conflict with the precedent set in the Arizona v. United States case, it’s not preempted by existing federal immigration law, it’s not in conflict with existing federal immigration law, and Texas has the absolute constitutional right, authority, and ability to protect and secure its borders and its sovereignty,” added Spiller.
Following the Supreme Court’s move, Attorney General Ken Paxton said, “Unfortunately, our stay was short-lived. Onward, I will continue to defend Texas.”
Results Matter: From Vision to Victory in 2023. Catalyzing Change Where Results Take Center Stage! [ [link removed] ] [ [link removed] ]
ACT NOW! BORDER AND IMMIGRATION INITIATIVES: 14M [ [link removed] ]
Stop the Border Invasion: 6.7M
Stop Taxpayer-Funded Invasion: 1.4M
Finish the Wall: 1.4M
No Amnesty for 30M Illegals: 921K
Suspend Illegal Entry to Illegal Aliens: 474K
Flag all Venezuelans as High-Risk (Hamas): 638K
Keep Texas Strong: 676K
Impeach and Replace Mayorkas: 595K
Impeach Biden, Garland, Wray, Mayorkas, and Graves: 1.9M
Defund Sanctuary Cities: 509K
No Veteran Resources for Illegals: 461K
Stop Chinese Paramilitary Illegal Entries: 265K
BECOME A MEMBER! [ [link removed] ]
Join the Movement [ [link removed] ]!
Make Your Voice Heard Today! [ [link removed] ]
News without Rhetoric, Actions that Matter!
For the price of a $5 cup of coffee a month, you can help us stop the Marxist march into oblivion! Free Autographed Copy of NY Times Best Seller “Because They Hate” with your annual subscription while supplies last. [ [link removed] ]
Act for America is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Unsubscribe [link removed]?