BLACK REPUBLICAN BLOG

///////////////////////////////////////////
Cuomo Is No Hero

Posted: 28 Mar 2020 06:04 AM PDT
[link removed]


By John Hinderaker | Powerline

New York Governor Andy Cuomo, like President Trump, is delivering daily
coronavirus briefings. Unlike President Trump, he is being swooned over by
liberal reporters. At American Greatness, Julie Kelly collects some
examples. Here is just one:
“If social media is a reflection of how people are feeling, Cuomo’s image
during the coronavirus outbreak is one of authority, yet hope—a role people
value enough to begin visualizing his presidency,” one smitten CBS News
reporter cooed.
This is odd, if only because New York is the epicenter of COVID-19
infection in the U.S. The disease is more widespread there, and more
problematic, than anywhere else. According to the CDC, New York has 38,977
COVID-19 cases out of the country’s 85,356, vastly more than any other
state. California has 3,777, and Washington 3,207. So why would those in
charge of New York’s response to the epidemic be held up as heroes, and
Cuomo touted as a replacement for Joe Biden as Democratic presidential
nominee?
The fact that New York is the epicenter of the COVID crisis in the U.S. is
no coincidence. It flows from the policies of Governor Cuomo and New York
Mayor Bill DeBlasio, as well as New York City’s nature as an international
hub and a closely-packed city. Back to Julie Kelly:
[N]either Cuomo nor New York City Mayor Bill DeBlasio deserve attaboys. A
toxic combination of Big Apple hubris, devotion to open borders regardless
of the imminent threat, and Trump-hating obstinacy fueled a stubborn
strategy that left their citizens vulnerable for months.
Further, New York’s political leaders have acknowledged that the world’s
financial capital—a city home to nearly 9 million people, the most densely
populated city in the country—has no comprehensive plan to deal with a
pandemic or any viral public health threat.
Governor Cuomo came very late to the effort to shut down the Chinese virus:
By January 31, the day President Trump suspended flights from China,
“outbreaks were already growing in over 30 cities across 26 countries, most
seeded by travelers from Wuhan,” according to one model by the New York
Times.
But even by late February, Cuomo boasted about his state’s accessibility to
foreign travelers—his state, the governor said on February 26, is the
“front door” for visitors from around the world—while only instituting
voluntary quarantines for suspected coronavirus carriers.
“Our operating paradigm has always been, prepare for the worst but hope for
the best,” Cuomo said.
That paradigm, apparently, did not include prohibiting hundreds of
thousands of potentially infected travelers from entering his state since
January. Tourists and business travelers continued to pour into the Big
Apple during the first several days of March without any comprehensive
screening or restrictions.
Cuomo this week again bragged about his state’s open arms, which resulted
in New York’s current crisis. The reason New York now has so many more
cases of coronavirus, even more than California, is “because we welcome
people from across the globe,” he said on March 25. “We have people coming
here, we have people who came here from China, who came here from Italy,
who came here from all across the globe.”
Nice going, Governor! Open borders take priority over everything, including
your own constituents’ lives.
New York’s hospitals are overburdened and experiencing problems, but this
is not a recent development:
A public policy researcher in 2015 detailed long waits in New York City
emergency rooms. The head of the emergency department for the Mount Sinai
hospital system quit in 2018 after less than a year on the job.
“I had to follow my moral compass and leave and decide this is not an
organization that cares for patients,” Dr. Eric Barton told the New York
Post.
Last year, city nurses threatened to strike due to overcrowding at three
major hospital systems. “Nurse Anthony Ciampa said he had to choose
recently between feeding an elderly patient at New York Presbyterian and
treating several acutely ill patients because there weren’t enough other
nurses on duty,” according to a March 2019 report in the Daily News.
And the outcry about ventilators? State officials were informed several
years ago that the stockpile of ventilators was woefully inadequate to
handle a severe pandemic. But instead of preparing for a looming crisis and
buying 16,000 ventilators, the state’s health commissioner formed a task
force to develop a system to ration the life-saving equipment. The task
force “came up with rules that will be imposed when ventilators run short,”
the New York Post reported last week.
Now, of course, the same incompetent reporters who are swooning over Cuomo
blame President Trump for longstanding problems in New York’s hospital
system.
In a sane world, the idea that the governor of the state with by far the
worst coronavirus record would be singled out for praise by reporters would
be unthinkable. But of course, we do not live in a sane world–not a sane
media world, anyway.
[link removed]

///////////////////////////////////////////
Congress OKs $2T stimulus in historic coronavirus response, as reps
objections sidelined

Posted: 27 Mar 2020 11:55 AM PDT
[link removed]


By Marisa Schultz, Chad Pergram | Fox News

The House of Representatives on Friday overwhelmingly approved a more than
$2 trillion package to combat the coronavirus pandemic and send economic
relief to workers and businesses squeezed by restrictions meant to stop the
outbreak’s spread.
The legislation, approved by voice vote despite 11th-hour drama arising
from a GOP lawmaker’s objections, amounts to the costliest stimulus plan in
U.S. history. It includes checks for most Americans, boosted unemployment
aid, help for small business as well as a massive loan fund for
corporations – at a time when unemployment is surging at a record pace, a
consequence of businesses closing in compliance with social distancing
guidelines.
The bill, already approved by the Senate, now goes to President Trump's
desk.
“This bill is not only a rescue package, it is a commitment… that your
government and the people whom you’ve elected to serve will do everything
we can to limit the harm and hardship you face, both now and the
foreseeable future,” House GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said prior
to the vote.
The approval, while widely anticipated, followed a stretch of uncertainty
over whether one congressman -- concerned about the stunning cost of the
package -- might be able to stall the vote.
Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., had furiously objected to a simple voice vote
that would have required only a minimal number of lawmakers to travel.
Massie, as part of his push, wanted to ensure there is a quorum, which
would require half of the members to show up on Capitol Hill.
So as President Trump and others accused him of grandstanding, hundreds of
lawmakers were summoned to Washington D.C. Thursday night and Friday
morning from coronavirus-ravaged communities in New York, California and
elsewhere. This, despite strict guidelines from the Capitol physician
advising lawmakers not to congregate at the Capitol and stay in their
offices until needed to avoid the spread of the virus that has already
infected several lawmakers.
While Massie was able to ensure many lawmakers showed up for the vote, he
was not, in the end, able to force a roll-call.
The House, after several hours of debate, ultimately passed the measure by
voice vote, and it was allowed to stand.
There were loud cries for ‘ayes’ and few rumblings of ‘nos’ on the House
floor.
“The ayes have it,” declared the presiding officer Rep. Anthony Brown, D-Md.
But Massie stood up and objected. “I came here to make sure our republic
doesn’t die by unanimous consent in an empty chamber and I request a
recorded vote,” Massie said.
Brown ruled that an insufficient number of lawmakers stood in support of a
roll call vote. But Massie pressed on.
“I object on the basis that a quorum is not present,” Massie said,
instructing a count of lawmakers.
“A quorum is present and the motion is adopted,” Brown ruled, to applause.
Minutes before the vote, Speaker Nancy Pelosi also took to the floor to
summon lawmakers in an effort to gather quorum and shut down the Massie
effort.
Pelosi touted the aid forthcoming for hospitals, Americans and small
businesses, while acknowledging that more needs to be done for the
frontline healthcare workers and paying homage to a New York nurse who died
while serving at a hospital that didn’t have enough gowns.
“We know that this cannot be our final bill,” Pelosi said.
In a series of speeches prior to the historic rescue bill, lawmakers
pressed for unity.
“We're going to help American through this," McCarthy said. "We're going to
do this together and in the end, we are going to be healthier, stronger and
more united than ever before because as Americans, that's who we are.”
Upon catching wind of the plan to stop a roll-call vote, though, Massie
howled on Twitter over the parliamentary machinations.
"It’s pretty clear now, with enough members here to pass the bill, that
Pelosi and McCarthy are still working together to block a recorded vote
just to insulate members of Congress from ACCOUNTABILITY. Biggest spending
bill in the history of mankind, and no recorded vote? #SWAMP," he tweeted.
Emotions ran hot on the House floor all morning Friday before the vote on
the $2 trillion stimulus bill.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., started her impassioned floor speech
by noting 13 people died in one day at Queen’s Elmhurst Hospital and
medical professionals still don’t have enough ventilators and personal
protection equipment.
She ripped the Senate for fighting for corporate bailouts that will
contribute to the income inequality gap in order for families to get
“crumbs.”
“What did the Senate majority fight for? One of the largest corporate
bailouts with as few strings as possible in American history. Shameful!”
Ocasio-Cortez said.
“The greed of that fight is wrong for crumbs for our families.
“There should be shame about what was fought for in this bill, and the
choices that we have to make.”
On the other side of the aisle, Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., said he’s
“distressed by the Hobson’s choice” put forth before lawmakers Friday
saying lawmakers shouldn’t have to accept unrelated “bailouts” to send
relief.
“As we discussed this and also discuss a fourth [package], no more Hobson's
choice. No more billion-dollar bailouts for things that are unrelated. No
more policies that are long-standing for a short-standing issue that needs
are critical attention,” Perry said. “…Whatever we do, let's do no harm.”
In a bizarre and seemingly unnecessary point of drama, Rep. Haley Stevens,
D-Mich., refused to stop speaking when her time ran out on the House floor,
even though Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., was willing to let her
finish if she had just paused to let him officially grant her more time.
Instead, Stevens continued yelling and held up her hands – clad with pink
surgical gloves—in an apparent homage to front line healthcare workers
fighting the coronavirus pandemic even though her mic was cut.
As the presiding speaker was pounding the gavel and ruling Stevens “out of
order,” Stevens screamed, “do not be afraid!”
Republicans, who are trying hard to flip the freshman rep’s seat in
November, immediately pounced on the outburst as a “meltdown.”
Michigan Democrat Rep. Haley Stevens just had ANOTHER meltdown, this time
on the floor of the House of Representatives.

The bill finances a response with a price tag that equals half the size of
the entire $4 trillion-plus annual federal budget. The $2.2 trillion
estimate is the White House's best guess of the spending it contains.
The legislation would provide one-time direct payments to Americans of
$1,200 per adult making up to $75,000 a year and $2,400 to a married couple
making up to $150,000, with $500 payments per child.
Unemployment insurance would be made far more generous, with $600 per week
tacked onto regular state jobless payments through the end of July. States
and local governments would receive $150 billion in supplemental funding to
help them provide basic and emergency services during the crisis.The
legislation also establishes a $454 billion program for guaranteed,
subsidized loans to larger industries in hopes of leveraging up to $4.5
trillion in lending to distressed businesses, states, and municipalities.
All would be up to the Treasury Department's discretion, though businesses
controlled by Trump or immediate family members and by members of Congress
would be ineligible.
There was also $150 billion devoted to the health care system, including
$100 billion for grants to hospitals and other health care providers
buckling under the strain of COVID-19 caseloads.
Frustrations were already hot as lawmakers had to return to Washington in a
panic after Massie, R-Ky., threatened to upend plans for a simple voice
vote and force a recorded vote.
Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., alluded to the Massie controversy on the House
floor.
“So to you who oppose this bill. Please, please stand down. We can't wait
another day to help. Don't add to this disruption, by in fact, being a
disruptor. Be a leader," Upton said.
Lawmakers spoke passionately about how COVID-19 is hurting the health of
their communities and how the widespread shutdown of the economy is
crippling families and businesses. Yet many openly grappled with voting in
favor of bill they believe will be helpful, while it’s chock-full of other
provisions that they disagree with.
“This is ripping my heart out because there’s things in this bill that just
don’t belong there,” said Rep. David Schweikert, R-Ariz., “I consider
them”, then the GOP rep stopped himself. “Well, I can’t say that word in
front of a microphone.”Schweikert, however, argued Congress must “do the
right thing” by passing the legislation.
However, Rep. Ken Buck, R-Colo., said he'll oppose the legislation over
cost and debt concerns.
"As President Trump said, we cannot let the cure be worse than the problem
itself," Buck said.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
[link removed]

///////////////////////////////////////////
Johns Hopkins Study: USA More Prepared for Pandemic Than Any Other Country

Posted: 27 Mar 2020 10:34 AM PDT
[link removed]


By Matt Margolis | P J Media

Despite claims by the mainstream media and the Democratic Party that the
United States was "ill-prepared" to handle the coronavirus pandemic and
that actions by Trump administration made us vulnerable, the United States
was actually ranked the best-prepared country in the worldto handle a
pandemic in a study by Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) and the Johns
Hopkins Center for Health Security (JHCHS) published in late 2019.
The United States' Global Health Security Index score was 83.5/100, the
highest overall score of 195 countries. The United Kingdom came in second
with a score of 77.9. Italy, which has experienced significant difficulties
in handling the outbreak in their country, scored 56.2. Iran, which is also
struggling to handle the pandemic, scored 37.7.
The Trump administration has been the target of a significant amount of
misinformation being disseminated by the Democrats and the mainstream media
designed to undermine confidence in the administration's handling of the
pandemic, including false reports that Trump "dissolved" the White House
pandemic response office and that Trump cut funding to the CDC and NIH.
Despite these false reports, Trump's approval ratings have improved in the
past few weeks, and his response to the pandemic has the approval of 60
percent of Americans, according to the latest Gallup poll.
The Global Health Security index "was developed with guidance from an
international panel of experts from 13 countries, with research by the
Economist Intelligence Unit. More than 100 researchers spent a year
collecting and validating publicly available data," the Washington Post
reported last year._____
Matt Margolis is the author of Trumping Obama: How President Trump Saved Us
From Barack Obama's Legacy and the bestselling book The Worst President in
History: The Legacy of Barack Obama. You can follow Matt on Twitter
@MattMargolis
[link removed]

RELATED ARTICLE
The Top 10 Lies About President Trump’s Response to the Coronavirus
BY MATT MARGOLIS | P J MEDIA

President Donald Trump speaks during a press briefing with the coronavirus
task force, at the White House, Tuesday, March 17, 2020, in Washington. (AP
Photo/Evan Vucci)
It’s troubling to see how quickly disinformation about the government’s
response to the coronavirus has spread. Democrats and the mainstream media
have willingly spread false information in the hopes of damaging Trump
politically before the election in November. Many of these lies were
quickly debunked, but that hasn’t stopped the false information from being
repeated over and over.
The left hopes these lies will continue to spread, but so far it doesn’t
seem to be working since Trump’s approval numbers for his handling of the
pandemic have gone up.
But that doesn’t mean the left will give up their disinformation campaign.
To help set the record straight, I’ve compiled the top ten lies that have
been spread about Trump’s response to the coronavirus pandemic.
...
CLICK HERE TO READ THE REST OF THIS ARTICLE

--
You are subscribed to email updates from "BLACK REPUBLICAN BLOG."
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now:
[link removed]

Email delivery powered by Google.
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States