Both US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and UK Foreign Secretary David Cameron reveal their simplistic, and somewhat imperialist, Western approach to a complex Middle Eastern situation, irrespective of the aims and intentions of the two parties chiefly involved: the radical Islamists of Gaza and the West Bank, and the State of Israel itself.

"They [Hamas] told us in all of their statements that their charter is to destroy Israel and exterminate the Jews. Other countries have said the same thing. It's also in the Houthis' charter. It's in Iran's direct messaging. I think that when they tell you they want to kill you, you should believe that. I think that's the lesson." — Safra Catz, CEO of Oracle, ynetnews.com, February 24, 2024.

Realistically, the Palestinian claim to Gaza is based on tenuous grounds. Gaza is not the traditional homeland of the so-called Palestinian people. They are simply a collection of nomadic Arabs who forged that identity for political expediency. This arrangement was openly stated by the late PLO executive committee member, Zoheir Moshen, in an interview with James Dorsey for the Dutch newspaper Trouw, on March 31, 1977: "The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians, and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak about the existence of a Palestinian people since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism."

Even if a political compromise were reached over Gaza, or, the "1949 Armistice Line" as in the revised 2017 Hamas charter, the violent struggle for control over the rest of Israel, particularly the West Bank -- the "heart" of Israel -- will persist.

Whatever the turnout, it is clear that not a single critic of the current domestic and foreign policies will be elected.

The two assemblies are likely to return as more ardently committed than before to follow the "Supreme Guide" wherever he is heading.

It is in that sense that the twin elections have some interest. They will show that the Islamic Republic is not only hostile to any structural reform, but also unwilling to change its behavior.

That clarification will force the regime's many opponents, both inside and outside Iran, to abandon old fantasies about its change of behavior, let alone readiness to seek some accommodation with real or imagined foes.