Weiner Laptop Email Cover-Up

[WEEKLY UPDATE]

‘WEINER TIMELINE': HOW THE FBI GAVE HILLARY COVER DURING THE
ELECTION

[[link removed]]

We just released 180 pages
[[link removed]]
of communications between former FBI official Peter Strzok and former
FBI attorney Lisa Page that include Strzok’s “weiner timeline,”
which shows a time gap of almost a month between the discovery of
former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails on the laptop of
disgraced former Congressman Anthony Weiner and the obtaining of a
search warrant.

On November 3, 2016, Strzok sends an email
[[link removed]]
to Page with a “weiner timeline.” The document shows that on
September 28, 2016, the Assistant Director in Charge (ADIC) of the New
York Office of the FBI reported “potential MYE-related material,”
referring to Midyear Exam, which was the code name of the FBI’s
Clinton email investigation. The timeline shows that not until October
30, almost a month after the discovery, was a search warrant for the
emails obtained:


09/26/2016
NYO [New York Office] obtains SW [search warrant
[[link removed]]]
for Weiner laptop

09/28/2016
ADIC NY NOTES POTENTIAL MYE-RELATED MATERIAL following weekly SAC
[Special Agent in Charge] SVTC [Secure Video Teleconference]

09/29/2016
Conference call between NYO and MYE team

* NYO notes processing is crashing system and not complete, but
during troubleshooting OBSERVES MATERIAL POTENTIALLY RELATED TO MYE
(CLINTONEMAIL.COM AND STATE.GOV DOMAINS) SEEN DURING COURSE OF REVIEW
* No numbers/volume available
* Discussion about ability to search for material determines such
activity would be outside scope of warrant
* Request to NYO to gather basic facts (numbers, domains, etc) based
on their review

Approx. 10/19/2016
NYO completes carving
NYO OBSERVES SBU [Sensitive but Unclassified] attachment

10/21/2016
6:00 PM DOJ/NSD advises MYE leadership that SDNY informed them
of MYE- RELATED MEDIA ON WEINER MEDIA

10/25/2016
DOJ-DD CONVERSATION RE MATERIAL

10/26/2016
DOJ-MYE-NYO CONFERENCE CALL
DD ADVISED OF RESULTS OF CALL WITH MYE TEAM CONCLUSION MATERIAL SHOULD
BE LOOKED AT; DD DIRECTS BRIEFING TO D

10/27/2016
Briefing to D; D concurs with conducting investigation to obtain
data

10/30/2016
SW [search warrant
[[link removed]]]
SWORN
OUT AT SDNY
Copy of media obtained by MYE SAs [Special Agents], entered into
evidence, and provided to OTD [Operational Technology Division] for
processing

A partial Strzok timeline was included in Department of Justice
Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s June 2018 report
[[link removed]]
on the Clinton email
investigation. Also, the report suggested possible bias by Strzok:
“[W]e did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision to prioritize
the Russia investigation over following up on the Midyear-related
investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop was free from
bias.”

The new documents are the latest production from a January 2018
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit
[[link removed]]
filed after the DOJ failed to respond to a December 2017 request for
all communications between Strzok and Page (_Judicial Watch v. U.S.
Department of Justice
[[link removed]
(No. 1:18-cv-00154)).

The FBI is only processing the records at a rate of 500 pages per
month and has refused to process text messages. At this rate, the
production of these communications won’t be completed until late
2021.

The new records we uncovered also include an email chain that
concludes on November 5, 2016 — the day before Comey notified
Congress
[[link removed]]
that the FBI had not changed its July conclusion – with the subject
line “Drafting
[[link removed]
in which Strzok indicates that he is working on the “initial
review” of “the data” for an upcoming statement.

In an additional version of the November 2016 “Drafting
[[link removed]
email thread Strzok concludes that he found “no new potentially
classified email on the media [laptop] …”

In a November 6, 2016, email
[[link removed]]
with the subject line “Request for conference call bridge” Strzok
tells senior FBI officials: “[Redacted], Jon and I completed our
review of all of the potential HRC work emails on the laptop. We found
no previously unknown, potentially classified emails on the media
[laptop].”

Reportedly, only 3,077 of the more than 300,000 emails found on the
Weiner laptop “were directly reviewed
[[link removed]]
for classified or incriminating information. Three FBI officials
completed that work in a single 12-hour spurt the day before Comey
again cleared Clinton of criminal charges.”

The emails also include an October 30, 2016, email titled “MYE data
update
[[link removed]
in which Strzok tells other top FBI officials: “The discussion of
the classified email remains accurate.”

In an October 31, 2016, email thread
[[link removed]]
discussing a _New York Times_ article about the FBI conducting a
review of Huma Abedin’s emails found on Weiner’s laptop that
Strzok circulated to then-Deputy Assistant Director of
Counterintelligence Jonathan Moffa, then-Assistant Director for
Counterintelligence Bill Priestap, and redacted persons, Moffa says:
“I think [redacted],” to which Strzok replies, “Yes. Yes we did.
Makes you wonder who dialed in ...” Moffa responds, “Sure does.
First reference I’m ever aware of to our review network too.”

On November 1, 2016, a redacted official in the Director’s Office
emails
[[link removed]]
Strzok, Page and other redacted persons with a “Media question,”
asking, “Politico asks why all of Huma’s electronic devices she
may have used were not subpoenaed early on. Could you please provide
any guidance on how I should respond? [Redacted]. Thank you.” Strzok
replies, “Hi [redacted].”

On October 31, 2016, Strzok forwarded
[[link removed]]
to Page a Mother Jones article titled “A Veteran Spy Has Given the
FBI Information Alleging a Russian Operation to Cultivate Donald
Trump,” concerning the allegations by a “former senior
intelligence officer for a Western country who specialized in Russian
counterintelligence” that the Russian government “has for years
tried to co-opt and assist Trump.”

On October 31, 2016, Strzok forwarded
[[link removed]]
to Priestap, Moffa, Page and unidentified persons an NBC News article
titled, “FBI Making Inquiry into Ex-Trump Campaign Manager’s
Foreign Ties,” about an FBI investigation of Paul Manafort, with
Strzok saying, “Wow, busy news night. Talked with [redacted]
earlier, he said [Washington Post reporter] Ellen Nakashima had
mentioned below to him.” An unidentified General Counsel office
official then responds, “FYI – Slate has an article on the Trump
server.”

(The _Slate_ article
[[link removed]]
that alleged that Trump’s campaign set up a covert communication
system with Russia during the 2016 election using a computer server in
the United States and another owned by a Russian bank has been widely
debunked.)

On November 14, 2016, _New York Times_ reporter Matt Apuzzo emailed
[[link removed]]
an unidentified FBI official asking, “We got this in the mail today.
Any truth to it?” Attached was an “Affidavit for a Criminal Arrest
Warrant and Search Warrants,” purporting to have been sworn out by
an FBI agent and allegedly “charging DONALD JOHN TRUMP with
conspiracy to commit espionage …” The FBI official forwarded it to
Strzok and other redacted officials, saying, “For your awareness.
The NYT provided the attached document to us today in order to verify
its authenticity. It is supposedly an affidavit in support of
espionage charges against Donald John Trump. They received it in the
mail today. They doubt it is an authentic document noting there are
numerous inaccuracies. Wanted to provide it for your awareness.”
Strzok forwards it to Page, saying, “Told them it was not authentic.
[Redacted].”

We also received productions of 171 pages
[[link removed]]
and 119 pages
[[link removed]]
of Strzok-Page emails showing the FBI actively pushed stories to the
media to stoke its claim that the bureau was “highly confident
[[link removed]
Russia was “behind recent hacks.” One email shows Strzok telling
Page about an appearance on CNN by then-Assistant Attorney General for
National Security John Carlin
[[link removed]
“On CNN now talking about hacking of state election systems. NICE
coordination NSD….”

The new emails also show Strzok, Page and other high-ranking FBI
officials discussing
[[link removed]]
the “alleged destruction of laptops;” a lengthy discussion about
how to respond to a reporter’s inquiry into an alleged _quid pro quo
[[link removed]
related to Hillary Clinton’s emails in which the State Department
would create additional FBI overseas positions; and Strzok defending
[[link removed]]
Director James Comey after a former FBI official said Comey had
“thrown all the agents under the bus.”

These new records show how Hillary Clinton was protected from
investigation over the Weiner laptop by the FBI for a full month
during the presidential campaign. And the documents further confirm
that Strzok pushed laundered media Russia smears of Trump within the
FBI. No wonder the FBI is slow rolling the release of these documents.

We recently uncovered
[[link removed]]
records showing that Clinton apologized to the FBI over her email
abuses, but that apology was not in the FBI 302 report documenting her
interview. Records also showed that Strzok had information on an
intelligence briefing for then-candidate Trump.

In early February 2020, we made public
[[link removed]]
several emails between Strzok and Page
[[link removed]]
that showed their direct involvement in the opening of Crossfire
Hurricane, the bureau’s investigation of alleged collusion between
the Trump campaign and Russia. The records also showed “confirmed
classified emails” on Clinton’s unsecure, non-state.gov email
server “beyond the number presented” in Comey’s statements.

In January 2020, we revealed
[[link removed]]
Strzok-Page emails that detail special accommodations were given to
the lawyers of Clinton and her aides during the investigation of her
email controversy. Additionally, in November 2019, Judicial Watch
uncovered Strzok-Page emails
[[link removed]]
showing the attorney representing three of Clinton’s aides met with
senior FBI officials.

In November 2019, we received DOJ records
[[link removed]]
showing that, after Clinton’s statement
[[link removed]]
denying the transmission of classified information over her unsecure
email system, Strzok sent an email to FBI officials citing “three
[Clinton email] chains” containing (C) [classified] portion marks in
front of paragraphs.”

In June 2019, we uncovered emails showing that FBI top officials were
scrambling to write a letter to Congress to supplement Comey’s
Senate testimony in an apparent attempt to muddle
[[link removed]]
his message. Also, in that month, we received records showing then-FBI
General Counsel James Baker instructing FBI officials to expedite the
release
[[link removed]]
of FBI investigative material to Hillary Clinton’s lawyer, David
Kendall, in August 2016. Kendall and the FBI’s top lawyer discussed
specifically quickly obtaining the FBI’s 302 report of its interview
with Clinton.

In February 2019, we uncovered emails documenting an evident cover-up
of a chart
[[link removed]]
of potential violations of law by Clinton. A few weeks earlier, we
uncovered DOJ records
[[link removed]]
revealing former FBI General Counsel James Baker discussed the
investigation of Clinton-related emails on Weiner’s laptop with
Clinton’s lawyer David Kendall. Baker then forwarded the
conversation to his FBI colleagues.

In a separate Judicial Watch case, U.S. District Court Judge Royce C.
Lamberth recently granted
[[link removed]]
our request to depose Clinton about her emails and Benghazi-related
documents. The court also ordered
[[link removed]]
the deposition of Clinton’s former Chief of Staff, Cheryl Mills and
two other State Department officials.

You can see that Judicial Watch’s efforts to uncover the truth about
the Deep State cover-up for Hillary Clinton and the attendant abuse of
President Trump have yielded significant success. But this is still
but a taste as we pry documents out almost on a daily basis. So,
stay tuned…

FBI TELLS COURT TRANSPARENCY NOT MISSION-CRITICAL

Our FBI has blessed us with a fitness app and is promoting
[[link removed]]
it on Twitter –
to the horror
[[link removed]]
of privacy advocates, because it requires users to enter their GPS
coordinates.

At the same time, our FBI has shut down its FOIA operations, because
of the coronavirus.

Here’s the latest. We have released a joint status report
[[link removed]]
in FOIA lawsuit for records about top Justice Department official
Bruce Ohr and his wife Nellie Ohr, in which the DOJ states it has
suspended electronic FOIA operations. The Ohrs were involved in the
anti-Trump dossier authored by former British spy Christopher Steele.

The Justice Department claims it is currently unable to continue
searching for documents because the employees who would conduct the
search in the FBI Records / Information Dissemination Section (RIDS)
are, “non-mission critical” during the COVID-19 pandemic and were
ordered to stay at home beginning March 17, 2020.

Included in the joint status report is a declaration from Michael G.
Seidel, the FBI’s Assistant Section Chief of RIDS, Information
Management Division, in which he states:

> RIDS employees have been designated as not mission-critical and sent
> home as of March 17, 2020. Only a limited number of managers are
> being permitted to report to the office, but no FOIA processing is
> occurring as of March 17, 2020. While RIDS currently anticipates
> that its staff will return to work on March 30, 2020, this situation
> remains fluid and will be regularly re-assessed as circumstances
> change. As of March 17,2020, no further production of records
> pursuant to FOIA will be made, whether those productions are in
> relation to requests in litigation or at the administrative stage.
The filing comes in a March 2018 Freedom of Information Act lawsuit
[[link removed]]
we brought after Justice failed to respond a December 2017 request
(_Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice_
[[link removed]]
(No.
1:18-cv-00490)) for:

* All records of contact or communication, including but not limited
to emails, text messages, and instant chats between Bruce Ohr and any
of the following individuals/entities: former British intelligence
officer Christopher Steele; owner of Fusion GPS Glenn Simpson; and any
other employees or representatives of Fusion GPS.

* All travel requests, authorizations and expense reports for Bruce
Ohr.

* All calendar entries for Bruce Ohr.

So those responsible for Spygate get a breather while the people’s
right to transparency is put on hold. When it came to spying on
President Trump and innocent Americans, the FBI spared no expense, but
coming up with a plan to fulfill their legal obligation to
transparency can be put off indefinitely?

Judicial Watch and the DOJ have agreed to provide another joint status
report on April 8, 2020.

We previously uncovered that Ohr was used by the FBI as a conduit for
the Clinton-funded dossier by the Clinton-DNC spy ring at Fusion GPS.
His wife Nellie, who was employed by Fusion GPS, passed dossier
information to the FBI through him and later deleted emails received
from him.

In April 2019, we uncovered documents
[[link removed]]
showing that Bruce Ohr knew he had “possible ethics concerns,” in
his January 2018 preparation to testify to the Senate and House
intelligence committees. He emailed his attorney and forwarded that
information to his wife.

Bruce Ohr testified
[[link removed]]
to Congress that he received Clinton-dossier information from his wife
Nellie, who provided him with a memory stick that he then circulated
to the FBI.

In May 2019, we uncovered
[[link removed]]
that
Nellie Ohr told Bruce that she deleted emails received from his DOJ
account.

In June 2019, we uncovered
[[link removed]]
that
Bruce Ohr received a total of $42,520 in performance bonuses during
the Trump/Russia investigation. Ohr’s bonus nearly doubled from
$14,520 (received in November 2015) to $28,000 in November 2016.

On August 9, 2019 we obtained
[[link removed]]
Bruce
Ohr’s 302s showing that he was one of the main conduits used by
Fusion GPS to spread the false information they created to smear
President Trump.

On August 14, 2019, we uncovered
[[link removed]]
even
more evidence that Nellie Ohr sent Clinton-funded dossier materials to
the DOJ through her husband Bruce.

We don’t need fitness apps from the FBI we need the agency to follow
the law.

HILLARY’S EMAILS & BENGHAZI—INSIDE OUR LANDMARK LEGAL BATTLE

Because we our lawsuits exposed Hillary Clintons secret personal email
server to the world, I’m not surprised that she will do anything
[[link removed]]
to avoid being questioned by our crack attorneys. Micah Morrison, our
chief investigative reporter, offers his perspective
[[link removed]]
on this significant case.

> Life continues to unfold, even in the midst of the coronavirus
> pandemic. That includes—flying mostly under the media and legal
> radar—the most consequential freedom of information battle in a
> generation: Judicial Watch’s long fight for records related to
> Hillary Clinton’s emails and the Benghazi affair. In a landmark
> ruling earlier this month, U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth
> granted Judicial Watch’s request to depose Mrs. Clinton in the
> case. Mrs. Clinton is directed to appear under oath and answer
> questions from Judicial Watch attorneys.

> It’s a big case. Lamberth called the issues in the lawsuit “one
> of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.”

> That was Lamberth in a 2018 ruling,_ FOUR YEARS _after Judicial
> Watch first filed a lawsuit in the case. The Lamberth memorandum
>
[[link removed]]
> is a fierce defense of the Freedom of Information Act that should be
> required reading for every law school FOIA seminar. It details the
> government’s “outrageous misconduct” in the case and notes
> President Obama himself defended FOIA as “the most prominent
> expression of a profound national commitment to ensuring an open
> government.” The ruling outlined the discovery Judicial Watch
> would be permitted to take in the case.

> The heart of the matter, Lamberth wrote in 2018, is that “faced
> with one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency,
> [Obama’s] State and Justice Departments fell far short. Did
> Hillary Clinton use her private email as Secretary of State to
> thwart [FOIA]? Was the State Department’s attempt to settle [a
> Judicial Watch] FOIA case in 2014 an effort to avoid searching—and
> disclosing the existence of—Clinton’s missing emails? And has
> State ever adequately searched for records in the case?”

> But government foot-dragging and stonewalling continued. Meanwhile,
> Judicial Watch discovered new emails (read about it here
>
[[link removed]]
> and here
>
[[link removed]])
> and Mrs. Clinton’s written responses proved insufficient to answer
> the questions raised by the court and in discovery. Earlier this
> month—_NEARLY SIX YEARS_ after the case commenced—Lamberth’s
> patience finally ran out. “The court agrees with Judicial
> Watch,” he wrote, “it is time to hear directly from Mrs.
> Clinton.”

> Lamberth’s 2020 order
>
[[link removed]]
> is stinging and concise. The State Department wants the matter
> closed and the Justice Department supports that position. “But
> there is still more to learn,” Lamberth notes. “Even though many
> important questions remain unanswered, the Justice Department
> inexplicably takes the position that the court should close
> discovery and rule on dispositive motions. The court is especially
> troubled by this. To argue that the court now has enough information
> to determine whether State conducted an adequate search is
> preposterous, especially when considering State’s deficient
> representations regarding the existence of additional emails.”

> Lamberth noted earlier decisions that high-ranking government
> officials should not be dragged into court to account for official
> actions unless there were “extraordinary circumstances.” But the
> Judicial Watch case clears that bar, he ruled.

> “The Court has considered the numerous times in which Secretary
> Clinton said she could not recall or remember certain details in her
> prior interrogatory answers,” Lamberth wrote. “In a deposition,
> it is more likely that plaintiff’s counsel could use documents and
> other testimony to refresh her recollection. And so, to avoid the
> unsatisfying and inefficient outcome of multiple rounds of fruitless
> interrogatories and move this almost six-year-old case to its
> conclusion, Judicial Watch will be permitted to clarify and further
> explore Secretary Clinton’s answers in person and immediately
> after she gives them.”

> What did Secretary Clinton know about her private email server,
> FOIA, and Benghazi communications, and when did she know it?
> Lamberth spells out some of the key questions.

> “For example,” Lamberth writes, “how did she arrive at her
> belief that her private emails would be preserved by normal State
> Department processes for email retention? Who told her that—if
> anyone—and when? Did she realize State was giving a ‘no
> records’ response to FOIA requests for her emails? If so, did she
> suspect that she had any obligation to disclose the existence of her
> private server to those at State handling the FOIA requests? When
> did she learn that State’s records management employees were
> unaware of the existence of her private server? And why did she
> think that using a private server to conduct State Department
> business was permissible under the law in the first place? Again,
> who told her that—if anyone—and when?”

> Mrs. Clinton’s legal team has fired back
>
[[link removed]]
> with an 83-page petition to the U.S. Court of Appeals asking it to
> throw out Judge Lamberth’s order. The deposition order is
> “inappropriate, unnecessary, and a clear abuse of discretion,”
> the Clinton lawyers wrote.

> But of course the real abuse here is a six-year stonewall and an
> assault on the Freedom of Information Act. Corrupt and secretive
> players throw roadblocks, stonewalls and legal obstacles in the way
> of transparency, accountability and reform. Bad actors drown the
> opposition in delays and expensive legal actions. It is instructive
> that this fight has taken six years. Most individuals and
> organizations do not have the money and legal firepower to fight the
> government for months or years, so the government wins. The critical
> message in the Lamberth rulings is that FOIA, an essential tool in
> holding the powerful to account, is under siege. Let’s hope the
> Court of Appeals recognizes that the real fight here is about
> transparency and accountability, and allows the deposition of
> Hillary Clinton to proceed.

OPEN BORDERS COALITION: FREE ALL ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS OVER CORONAVIRUS

The Left’s solution for everything seems to involve making our
streets less safe. There is a frenzy in places to release
[[link removed]]
prisoners from jail. Of course New York City is in on it
[[link removed]].

When should we not expect calls for releasing illegal aliens? Our
_Corruption Chronicles_ blog reports
[[link removed]].


> Although there have been no confirmed cases
>
[[link removed]]
> of Coronavirus disease in federal immigration detention facilities,
> open borders groups are taking advantage of the health crisis to
> demand that all illegal aliens be immediately released from custody
> and into communities throughout the United States. The movement,
> known as FreeThemAll
>
[[link removed]],
> was launched this month by a coalition of leftist nonprofits long
> critical of the Trump administration’s hardline immigration
> policies. “The immigrant community is at grave risk,” according
> to one of the groups leading the effort, Texas-based Refugee and
> Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services (RAICES). The
> public is encouraged to contact Immigration and Customs Enforcement
> (ICE) to demand that the agency “release all immigrants in
> detention, because detention is no place for a family, and no place
> for a family to be during a pandemic.”

> In a letter
>
[[link removed]]
> to ICE San Antonio Field Director Daniel Bible, RAICES Executive
> Officer Jonathan D. Ryan asks for the immediate release of detained
> illegal immigrant families and individuals due to COVID-19. He also
> urges ICE to suspend all deportation activity, citing
> unsubstantiated reports that illegal aliens deported from the U.S.
> have presented the first cases of COVID-19 in their countries of
> origin. “ICE should not participate in the spread of this
> dangerous virus around the world,” Ryan writes. “This is a
> public health emergency. It is critical that ICE detention centers
> and jails be prepared to respond appropriately to the crisis.” He
> continues to blast the agency by asserting that the U.S. government
> has a woeful history of addressing pandemics in ICE detention. “We
> are concerned about the health and safety of our clients who, with
> their liberty restricted in detention, cannot practice recommended
> social distancing from other detained persons or from detention
> center staff,” the RAICES chief writes.

> The group is part of a broader movement in the U.S. to release all
> illegal immigrants housed in federal detention centers throughout
> the country. Hundreds of immigrant rights advocates, human and civil
> rights groups and other leftist organizations are also pressuring
> federal authorities to release illegal aliens in federal custody via
> the Detention Watch Network
>
[[link removed]],
which aims to abolish
> immigration detention in the United States. “Detention Watch
> Network imagines a world where every individual lives and moves
> freely and a society in which racial equity is the norm and
> immigration is not criminalized,” according to the group’s
> website. “The abolition of immigration detention is part and
> parcel of struggles against racism, xenophobia, discriminatory
> policing, and mass incarceration and our aims coincide with these
> broader struggles against racialized oppression.”

> In a letter
>
[[link removed]]
> signed by 763 like-minded groups, Detention Watch Network orders ICE
> Director Matthew T. Albence to immediately release all people
> currently detained in immigration detention, cease all local
> enforcement operations and eliminate ICE check-ins and mandatory
> court appearances. The coalition also requests that the federal
> government make phone and video calls free for detainees and that
> fees be waived for all costs associated with soap, sanitizer and
> other hygiene products. If the government doesn’t release all
> detainees, the letter asks for a “commitment that at no point will
> a facility be locked down or closed off to outsiders or be
> considered in its entirety as a place of quarantine” so that
> family members and attorneys maintain access to the incarcerated.
> “Jails, prisons and detention centers are sites where people are
> acutely vulnerable to health complications and the impact of
> outbreaks,” the letter states. “Choosing to deprive people of
> their freedom contributes to the already lethal conditions of mass
> confinement.” Signatories include: Abolish ICE Denver, Allies to
> End Detention, Asians 4 Black Lives Portland, California Sanctuary
> Campaign, CASA-Maryland and Compañeros Inmigrantes de las Montañas
> en Acción.

> ICE currently has 37,311 illegal immigrants in detention facilities,
> according to the latest agency figures
>
[[link removed]].
More than
> half—19,526—have criminal convictions or pending criminal
> charges, the records show. As of March 14, U.S. Citizenship and
> Immigration Services (USCIS), the agency that administers the
> nation’s lawful immigration system, determined that 5,867 of the
> illegal aliens in ICE custody have an established persecution or
> torture claim.
>
Until next week,





[Contribute]
[[link removed]]


<a
href="[link removed]"
target="_blank"><img alt="WU01"
src="[link removed]"
style="width:100%; height:auto;" /></a>

[32x32x1]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x2]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]

Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 3rd St Sw Ste 800
Washington, DC 20024

202.646.5172



© 2017 - 2020, All Rights Reserved
Manage Email Subscriptions
[[link removed]]
|
Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]

View in browser
[[link removed]]