From ACT For America <[email protected]>
Subject The Big Lie: “Voting Machines are Secure”
Date February 29, 2024 8:46 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Hand Count Elections Within Reach!

[ACT For America]
[[link removed]]


[Share]
[FB]
[[link removed]]
[TW]
[[link removed]]
[IN]
[[link removed]]
[LI]
[[link removed]]
[YT]
[[link removed]]
[RU]
[[link removed]]
[CO]
[[link removed]]
[Browser]
[[link removed]]

Dear John,

HAND COUNT ELECTIONS ARE SIMPLE, RELIABLE, AFFORDABLE, AND WITHIN
REACH!

WE ARE SO EXCITED TO ANNOUNCE THE LAUNCH OF AN UNPRECEDENTED
COUNTY-BY-COUNTY CAMPAIGN TO BAN ALL VOTING MACHINES, BEGINNING WITH
TEXAS STATE, WITH THE BALANCE OF BATTLEGROUND STATES TO LAUNCH IN THE
NEXT TWO WEEKS.

Recently we reported on the FBI’s 'Extremely Alarming' Election
Threats!
[[link removed]]
CYBERSECURITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY AGENCY (CISA) recently
pointed out significant advancements that could empower nations like
China, North Korea, and Russia to target U.S. election systems. THE
HEIGHTENED RISK, ACCORDING TO GOLDSTEIN, APPLIES TO EVERY LOCATION,
REGARDLESS OF SIZE OR SECTOR.

Consider Germany, one of 26 democratic nations, that conducts hand
count elections now shielded from foreign and domestic election
interference.
[[link removed]]
Remarkably, they confidently report their election results by morning.
The question that echoes is simple: why can't we achieve the same
efficiency?

THESE NATIONS HAVE BANNED ELECTRONIC ELECTION TECHNOLOGY, USING
AMERICA'S EXPERIENCES AS A CAUTIONARY TALE OF WHAT CAN GO WRONG. They
emphasize the sacred nature of elections, demanding tamper-proof
processes with complete verifiable records and a robust forensic audit
trail to expose fraud. _IN AMERICA, WE’RE TOLD WE CAN’T EVEN SEE
OR AUDIT ELECTRONIC ELECTION DATA DUE TO CONTRACT AGREEMENTS-WHO’S
RUNNING OUR ELECTIONS?_

While it might seem unconventional for proud Americans to look to
Europe and other nations for guidance, our election security needs
require a thorough examination.

LET'S DEBUNK THE HAND COUNT MYTHS THAT HAVE KEPT US IN THE DARK:

"IT’S LESS ACCURATE THAN MACHINES." The truth is hand counting
provides a more accurate reflection of the people's will. It
eliminates the risk of glitches, malfunctions, or external
interference that machines may succumb to and typically provides
triple verification of the tally.

"IT REQUIRES TOO MANY COUNTERS." The reality is that hand counting can
be efficiently organized with proper planning and coordination.
Nations that hand count prove how simple and achievable it is to
report results in the first 24 hours, if not by morning. 

"IT’S TOO EXPENSIVE." On the contrary, hand-counting elections are
cost-effective. Eliminating the need for expensive voting machines
reduces the enormous financial burden on the electoral system,
ensuring resources are allocated more judiciously. 

NOTABLY, THE PRIMARY ARGUMENTS AGAINST HAND COUNTING NEVER INCLUDE
SECURITY RISKS. 

DID YOU KNOW MOST STATE LAWS PERMIT LOCAL ELECTION OFFICIALS TO
CONDUCT 100% HAND COUNT ELECTIONS?

ANY REPRESENTATIVE REJECTING THE BANNING OF THESE VOTING MACHINES AND
ELECTRONIC DEVICES IS PROTECTING A FUNDAMENTALLY UNSECURE AND
POTENTIALLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL ELECTION SYSTEM. The reality that any
entry-level hacker can penetrate these systems within a mere 1-7
minutes, whether in person or remotely, is a grave threat to the
election process.

THE INDISCRIMINATE VULNERABILITY OF VOTING MACHINES, IRRESPECTIVE OF
INTERNET CONNECTIVITY, DEMANDS SWIFT AND DECISIVE ACTION. Beyond the
machines used in local precincts, the evidence of remote hacking
through state systems, including unauthorized access to central vote
tallies on state government websites, underscores the urgent need for
local and legislative intervention.

MOREOVER, THE UNDETECTABILITY OF INTRUSIONS, OFTEN LINGERING
UNDISCOVERED FOR EXTENDED PERIODS AVERAGING ONE YEAR, POSES AN
EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO THE CREDIBILITY OF OUR ELECTIONS. Even
institutions with advanced cybersecurity measures, such as the
Pentagon, NSA, the White House, and numerous state government and
utility systems, have fallen victim to successful intrusions. THE
SIMPLICITY OF VOTING MACHINES MAKES THEM PARTICULARLY SUSCEPTIBLE,
WARRANTING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION TO SECURE OUR ELECTION INFRASTRUCTURE.

IT’S A DISGRACE FOR LAWMAKERS TO CONTINUE TO DEFEND THE IMPOSSIBLE
AND BLATANTLY FALSE CLAIMS THAT VOTING MACHINES ARE SAFE AND SECURE; A
HIDDEN TRUTH THAT POLITICIANS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE AGREED ON
BEFORE 2016.

TEXAS VOTERS ARE READY FOR CHANGE! Texas Hill Country's GOP, including
Gillespie and Kerr Counties, is leading a shift towards hand-counted
ballots in the upcoming March primary. This aligns with a broader
trend seen in GOP leadership across Texas, where considerations for
hand-counting ballots are gaining momentum, from larger counties like
Dallas to smaller ones like Uvalde. The move signifies a potential
resurgence of conventional hand-count elections, with Texas Hill
Country at the forefront.

[Ban All Voting Machines]
[[link removed]]


[ACT Now: Click Here!]
[[link removed]]


TEXAS STATE: CALL ON COUNTY ELECTION OFFICIALS TO BAN VOTING MACHINES
AND HAND COUNT ELECTIONS TODAY.
[[link removed]]

JOIN THE MOVEMENT: NOW RECRUITING AND TRAINING LEADERS FOR EVERY
COUNTY NATIONWIDE TO HELP SECURE OUR 2024 ELECTIONS!
[[link removed]]


BECOME A MEMBER! FOR THE PRICE OF A COUPLE OF CUPS OF COFFEE A MONTH,
YOU CAN HELP US STOP THE MARXIST MARCH INTO OBLIVION! TOGETHER WE
PRESERVE AMERICA AND SAVE OUR NATION.
[[link removed]]



[Contribute]
[[link removed]]


_ACT for America Education, a 501(c)(3) organization._
_All donations are tax-deductible._

1083 Independence Blvd, STE 806
Virginia Beach, VA 23455 USA

Contribute
[[link removed]]
| Charity Navigator
[[link removed]]
| Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]
 

[Share]
[FB]
[[link removed]]
[TW]
[[link removed]]
[IN]
[[link removed]]
[LI]
[[link removed]]
[YT]
[[link removed]]
[RU]
[[link removed]]
[CO]
[[link removed]]
[Browser]
[[link removed]]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis