From Mises Institute <[email protected]>
Subject Police Abuse of Asset Forfeiture Is Simply Highway Robbery. Plus: The Civil War Didn't Settle the Secession Question
Date February 26, 2024 7:14 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
View this email in your browser ([link removed])
February 26, 2024
A Note to Our Email List Subscribers:
Over the years, the number of email lists going out from the Mises Institute has become a bit unwieldy. So, beginning next week, we will be consolidating some of our email lists. If you are a subscriber, you will still receive regular emails highlighting our new articles, podcasts, and video content. But, depending on which lists you subscribe to, you will probably receive fewer total emails in your inbox each week. You will notice the emails look a bit different, but our goal is to continue sending you, as always, the best that mises.org has to offer.

[link removed]


** By James Bovard
------------------------------------------------------------


** Highway Robbery Continues to Be the Law of the Land ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Despite all of the adverse publicity about how police regularly abuse asset forfeiture laws, no one in law enforcement is ashamed enough to stop this outright thievery of money and property from vulnerable people.

READ ARTICLE ([link removed])
[link removed]


** By Ryan McMaken
------------------------------------------------------------


** No, the Civil War Did Not Forever Settle the Matter of Secession ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

By the logic of "we tried it before," the Soviet victory over Lithuania in 1953 meant that the question of independence was settled forever, and that Irish secession was forever verboten after the Easter Rebellion failed.

READ ARTICLE ([link removed])

[link removed]


** Robert P. Murphy | Dave Smith
------------------------------------------------------------


** Does Libertarianism Require Support for Open Borders? ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Dave Smith makes the Rothbardian/Hoppean case for government restriction on immigration, arguing that it's a second-best solution given the undeniable fact of government control of "public" property.

LISTEN NOW ([link removed])
[link removed]

============================================================
** Donate Today ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** RSS ([link removed])
You are receiving this email because of your interest in the Mises Institute.
** Read More at Mises.org ([link removed])
| ** Subscribe ([link removed])
| ** Add us to your address book ([link removed])


Our mailing address is:
Mises Institute
518 West Magnolia Avenue
Auburn, Alabama 36832

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis