Since Biden made his supplemental funding request to give foreign aid to Ukraine, Israel, the Indo-Pacific, and fund his open border policies, the conservative position has been consistent – if any version of this package moves forward, it should prioritize American interests:
- We cannot neglect our own border.We cannot pay for aid by going into more debt.
- We should not conflate issues. Biden is requesting aid for multiple countries, and separate votes should be held.
- All money spent is taxpayer money. Any bill should provide for full accountability and transparency to taxpayers.
The Senate’s $95 billion foreign aid supplemental fails to meet any of this criteria. And so it’s no surprise why Speaker Johnson says it is “dead on arrival” in the House.
Last week, some House members introduced a new version of the supplemental. While it is a step in the right direction, it still does not deliver adequate accountability for the foreign aid, responsible spending measures, or provide real border security.
To outline what exactly is in each bill, Heritage Action has created a detailed chart to compare the conservative criteria with the two versions of the supplemental. For an in-depth look at the options, click the link below.
Download full-size image of "Supplemental Comparison" graphic