"At the U.N. Israel has always benefitted from diplomatic protection by the United States, but as Israeli massacres, settlement building, ethnic cleansing of communities and so on have become more and more flagrant, Western powers have pushed the idea that it is a 'thoughtcrime' to accuse the perpetrating state," Ian Williams writes. The ICJ case against Israel shifts this dynamic. "The ICJ ruling has potential practical consequences, as a catalyst for initiatives for diplomatic, cultural and financial boycotts, which is why the Likud government actually fought the case brought forth by South Africa."
Read More
|