From Front Office Sports <[email protected]>
Subject Why Sabrina Versus Steph Matters
Date February 18, 2024 1:00 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
February 18, 2024

Read in Browser [[link removed]]

SPONSORED BY

The Sabrina-Steph three-point contest just added a new wrinkle to a weekend that, last year, culminated in record-low viewership for the NBA All-Star Game. But the close battle between two of the best shooters of all time also could have huge business implications for the WNBA and its players as the league approaches negotiations for a new media rights deal. Ionescu’s loyal fan base, and hype around women’s basketball ahead of March Madness, should only increase coming off her performance.

— Margaret Fleming [[link removed]]

Sabrina-Steph Wasn’t the ‘Battle of the Sexes’—But It Was Part of the Bigger War

FOS Illustration

On Saturday night of NBA All-Star weekend, Liberty guard Sabrina Ionescu faced off against her idol, Warriors guard Stephen Curry, in a new three-point exhibition. Ionescu went first and put up 26 points [[link removed]], identical to Damian Lillard’s winning score in the main competition.

The contest, which Curry narrowly won [[link removed]] with 29 points, was the first formal head-to-head competition between an NBA and WNBA player. (Afterward, some were already calling [[link removed]] for a Caitlin Clark-Curry showdown next year.) The WNBA is drawing its best viewership in decades, and last night’s event put one of the league’s biggest stars in front of millions more basketball fans than usual.

Back in July, Ionescu set a WNBA three-point contest record, scoring 37 out of 40 possible points. She sank 20 shots in a row to surpass Curry’s NBA-record 31 points. Ionescu called up Curry after her win, laughing and “still in shock,” as she told reporters before Saturday’s matchup. Then she jokingly challenged him to a shootout on X (formerly known as Twitter) [[link removed]], and a few days later, Curry said on ESPN [[link removed]] that he had to chase her record, and the two needed to decide the best three-point shooter. Cut to January, when mic’ed up before a Warriors game, Curry said [[link removed]] that he and Ionescu should “settle this once and for all.” A few days later, the official announcement followed.

The effect was setting in early—Ionescu gained 60,000 Instagram followers ahead of the competition in the three weeks since Curry challenged her, according to data from Social Blade. She got 20,000 alone the day after the official announcement was made.

“I do think that there are folks that [will have tuned in] that have just not paid attention to the quality and the level of athleticism in the WNBA,” says Sara Gotfredson, who founded Trailblazing Sports Group to create more commercial partnerships in women’s sports.

It’s easy to draw a comparison to the “Battle of the Sexes,” a prime-time, head-to-head matchup in 1973 between two of the sport’s biggest names, one man and one woman: Bobby Riggs and Billie Jean King.

“King describes that event as a true catalyst for social change,” says Caroline Fitzgerald, founder of the women’s sports marketing and consulting firm Goals.

The tone of last night’s competition was much different thanks to five decades of Title IX. “Billie knew that was so much bigger than sport. …There was this expectation that women couldn’t compete at the highest levels,” said Danette Leighton, CEO of King’s Women’s Sports Foundation. “It’s so nice to see where we are in 2024, this mutual respect between elite athletes.”

Unlike the tennis match, Ionescu didn’t gift her opponent a piglet, as King did, a nod to Riggs’s calling himself “the No. 1 male chauvinist pig.” This contest grew out of the Bay Area ballers’ long-standing friendship rather than a sexist challenge.

Still, an event where female athletes compete in front of a national audience in prime time is important for women’s basketball—both from a cultural and business standpoint.

Kyle Terada-USA TODAY Sports Giving the People What They Want

Fans love watching female athletes compete on a level playing field with male competitors. Take former Vanderbilt football kicker Sarah Fuller, Brown baseball player Olivia Pichardo, or former NASCAR driver Danica Patrick. When King faced Riggs in 1973, more than 30,000 people attended the match, while another 90 million viewers tuned in worldwide.

“There’s clearly something,” Fitzgerald says. “People like to see this kind of competition.”

The matchup is a perfect storm for brands, Fitzgerald says, between the story lines, competition, values of gender equity, and passionate women’s basketball viewers. WNBA fans are a great return for advertisers—ads running during the 2023 WNBA Finals were 30% more effective [[link removed]] than they were the year before, according to data from the TV ad-tracking platform EDO, while the ’23 NBA Finals were 29% less effective than they were in ’22.

“I just think it checks every single box for a brand that’s looking to get involved or enhance their marketing strategy through partnerships in sports,” Fitzgerald says.

Certain elements of this competition made it particularly enticing for viewers and advertisers, like the two shooters’ friendship, the natural way the showdown came together, and the fact that Ionescu had Curry on her screensaver and bedroom posters growing up. “I just think that fans feel that authenticity,” Gotfredson says of how it all came together.

Another element Fitzgerald says matters: Fans on both sides had something to root for. The 26-year-old Ionescu is a newer superstar, defending her title against one of the best shooters and most popular athletes of all time.

Plus, the two competed from the same line. Ionescu was originally set to shoot from WNBA distance, which is about the same as in FIBA, but she asked to switch to the NBA line because she says that’s the range she shoots and practices from anyway.

“I think it’s important that fans that are just tuning in are realizing that she is doing the exact same thing that the men are doing,” Gotfredson says. “I think there’s equity from the get-go, and I love that about this.”

The Bottom Line

Ionescu said that she’d been asked a few times to compare the competition to the “Battle of the Sexes.”

“This is just an opportunity, and sometimes that’s all you need to be able to go out there and shut a lot of people up, but also continue to thank those people that are continuing to push for what’s right,” Ionescu said before the contest.

A few weeks before facing Riggs, King helped secure women receiving equal prize money as men at the U.S. Open. Ionescu didn’t exactly carry the future of women’s sports on her shoulders last night, but WNBA salaries [[link removed]] are a long way from being equal to those in the NBA.

The WNBA gets $25 million [[link removed]] annually from ESPN, and another $13 million [[link removed]] per year from Scripps Ion, in deals running through the 2025 season. For reference, the NBA receives a combined $2.6 billion annually from Disney and Warner Bros. Discovery.

More fans lead to more attendance, viewership, and advertisers. (See: “Clarkonomics.” [[link removed]]) All of those metrics attract a more lucrative media rights deal, which will begin in the 2026 season. And as we’re seeing with the NWSL, a record media rights deal trickles down to record player contracts [[link removed]].

Last night could be a bigger deal than we realize.

SPONSORED BY APPLE CARD

The Perfect Cash Back Rewards Card

[[link removed]]

Any time you make a purchase with Apple Card, you’ll get up to 3% unlimited Daily Cash. That’s real cash [[link removed]] that never expires or loses value. You can also choose to open a high-yield [[link removed]]Savings account and automatically send your Daily Cash to Savings where it’ll grow at 4.50% APY.

All it takes is a few steps—no additional credit checks. And because it’s all built into the Wallet app, it’s simple to get started.

Apply for Apple Card in as little as a minute and see your credit limit offer—all without impacting your credit score [[link removed]].

Terms apply. Savings provided by Goldman Sachs Bank. Member FDIC.

Editors’ Picks Milestone Missed: Caitlin Clark Broke a Record. NBC Blew an Opportunity [[link removed]]by Amanda Christovich [[link removed]]NBC skipped an opportunity to put women’s college basketball history in front of hundreds of millions of homes. New Hoops Tournament Featuring UConn Women to Launch in 2024 [[link removed]]by Amanda Christovich [[link removed]]Tennessee, Iowa, Louisville, and UConn will face off in the Women’s Champions Classic in Brooklyn in December. Wilson Introduced an Airless Basketball for $2,500. We Had Questions [[link removed]]by Alex Schiffer [[link removed]]The black, 3D-printed ball appeared in last year’s Slam Dunk Contest. Advertise [[link removed]] Awards [[link removed]] Learning [[link removed]] Video [[link removed]] Podcast [[link removed]] Sports Careers [[link removed]] Written by Margaret Fleming [[link removed]] Edited by Peter Richman [[link removed]], Catherine Chen [[link removed]]

If this email was forwarded to you, you can subscribe here [[link removed]].

Update your preferences [link removed] / Unsubscribe [link removed]

Copyright © 2021 Front Office Sports. All rights reserved.

80 Pine Street Suite 3202 New York, NY 10005

Subscribe To Our Daily Newsletters

Email* EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Subscribe

Δ

Sign up for our newsletter. The influence of sports on business and culture.

Email* PhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Subscribe

Δ

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [[link removed]] and Terms of Service [[link removed]] apply.
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis