John, in May I wrote to supporters like you because the New York Times published a hit piece about Chloe Cole.
They described Chloe as an outlier totally dismissing her experience being coerced by doctors into a gender “transition” resulting in the amputation of her breasts at the age of 15.
The disgusting implication was that de-transitioners, like Chloe, do not exist and that Chloe should be ignored.
But now, 9 short months later, the New York Times did something we never saw coming.
They’re singing a very different tune.
Not only do they admit that de-transitioners exist…
…now the New York Times is actually publishing their stories.
I could barely believe my eyes, John.
The New York Times admits that children as young as three years old are being “transitioned.”
And they admitted that when doctors ask parents if they’d rather have a dead daughter or a living son, suggesting that children will kill themselves if they aren’t allowed to transition, they’re citing a faulty study and emotionally blackmailing parents.
The New York Times also writes—
Transgender activists have pushed their own ideological extremism, especially by pressing for a treatment orthodoxy that has faced increased scrutiny in recent years. Under that model of care, clinicians are expected to affirm a young person’s assertion of gender identity and even provide medical treatment before, or even without, exploring other possible sources of distress.
This is huge.
If the New York Times can recognize that children have no business undergoing dangerous gender transition, it means that even the Left is waking up to this insanity, and the momentum is on our side.
We have to seize this moment.
Our lawsuits on behalf of Chloe Cole, Layla Jane, and Luka Hein are picking up steam.
I hope I can count on your generous, tax-deductible donation today as we continue to hold gender clinics and radical doctors accountable in court.
To read about the hit piece they published last May, please scroll down.
Harmeet
