February 7, 2024
Permission to republish original opeds and cartoons granted.
You could eliminate every federal department, agency and fire every federal employee including the military and still not be able to balance the budget
By Robert Romano
Since 1963 through 2022, the percent growth of revenues has averaged 6.9 percent a year to its present level of $4.65 trillion, according to data compiled by the White House Office of Management and Budget.
In the meantime, mandatory spending including net interest owed on the national debt has grown an average 8.87 percent a year to its current level of $4.64 trillion.
And discretionary spending has grown an average 5.5 percent a year to its current level of $1.735 trillion.
Therefore, the ballooning budget deficit is not purely a matter of fiscal discipline.
When it comes to the spending Congress has control over, the spending it actually votes on, including wars, stimuli and supplementals — so-called discretionary spending — it has grown less on an annual basis than revenues.
That is a function of the bicameral system, and also two-party rule in Washington, D.C. including various feuds between Democrats and Republicans over the size and scope of spending, plus occasional party-infighting in cases of one-party rule in Congress, making it difficult to pass anything, and so Congress just tends to copy and paste annual spending each year with nominal increases that have accounted for less than the growth of revenue.
In fact, since 2011, when Republicans took control over the House from Democrats after the financial crisis, and instituted budget sequestration — which will once again go into effect on April 30 after the 2023 debt ceiling deal — discretionary spending has only grown 1.99 percent a year.
Meanwhile, since 2011, mandatory spending grew an average 7.7 percent a year.
And revenues grew an average 7.26 percent.
Meaning, despite more fiscal discipline than ever including two sequestrations in less than 20 years, the budget deficit has never been larger.
In fact, the entire discretionary budget of $1.736 trillion for 2023 could be eliminated right now — eliminating every department, agency and firing every federal employee including the military — and the budget would still not be balanced as the $34.1 trillion national debt grew by $1.855 trillion in 2023.
Put another way, the nation’s annual borrowing accounts for 106.8 percent of all discretionary spending.
And so, no tinkering around the edges of the appropriations process, which only impacts discretionary spending can ever do a thing to reduce the deficit, including with the imminent spending freezes of sequestration.
It’s all mandatory spending. Social Security will grow from $1.346 trillion to $2.37 trillion in 2033 amid the Baby Boomer retirement wave, a 76 percent increase.
Medicare will grow from $821 billion to $1.84 trillion, a 124 percent increase.
Medicaid will grow from $608 billion to $928 billion, a 52 percent increase.
These are the drivers of the budget, account for 52 percent of all federal spending by 2033. Once interest and other mandatory spending is accounted for, mandatory spending will account 77.8 percent of all federal spending, up from its current level of 72.7 percent.
The reason is simple, as the percentage of the working age population over the age of 65 continues to rapidly increase — since 1960, when the FDA approved birth control, it has gone from 16 percent of the population to 26 percent of the population — and with it the $34.1 trillion (and rising) U.S. national debt, data from the World Bank and the U.S. Treasury shows.
At the same time, as the growth rate of the working age population participating in the civilian labor force has dramatically slowed down thanks to plummeting fertility, so has nominal economic growth, Bureau of Labor Statistics and Bureau of Economic Analysis data shows.
There are two simultaneous outcomes that emerge. First, as the population rapidly ages, so too do Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid expenditures that seniors depend on explode.
In the meantime, thanks to slower growth, revenues will continue not to keep pace with expenditures. Revenues will increase from $4.6 trillion in 2023 to $7.4 trillion, a $2.5 trillion or 51 percent increase over ten years. But expenditures will grow even faster, with outlays growing from $6.37 trillion in 2022 to $9.9 trillion by 2033, a $3.7 trillion or a 55.4 percent increase over the next decade.
The White House Office of Management and Budget projects the national debt to skyrocket to more than $50 trillion by 2033, but that’s low-balling it. The debt has grown by about 8 percent a year since 1980 once recessions and wars are factored. At that rate, it should be about $65 trillion to $70 trillion by 2033 and $100 trillion by 2037 or so, well north of 200 percent debt to GDP.
The reason is because there are comparatively fewer taxpayers versus those receiving benefits as the structural deficit widens due to the drop in fertility, from 3.6 babies per woman in 1960 to 1.6 babies per woman in 2021 after birth control was approved by the FDA in 1960.
Fewer babies equals fewer workers who pay taxes. The more people who retire, the more we spend, and the fewer people working per retiree, the more we borrow. It’s that simple.
Yes, life expectancy has increased, but that would have mattered less if the Baby Boomers, Generation X and Millennials simply had more children, which would have meant more taxpayers.
As it is, Congress is catering to constituencies committed to reproductive rights and replacing our unreproductive native population with millions of new illegal immigrants, rather than have a discussion particularly with single women about the pressing need for new families to created, in the meantime pretending mightily that the debate over discretionary spending in the appropriations process is still relevant.
For Republicans and conservatives avoiding this discussion, two outcomes appear very likely as the national debt balloons, that is, failing to find enough new taxpayers to pay for entitlements, Congress will eventually move to raise taxes significantly to punitive levels and let in millions of more illegal immigrants to offset our demographic decline — and likely still be unable to balance the budget.
Robert Romano is the Vice President of Public Policy at Americans for Limited Government Foundation.
Video: Border Bill GUARANTEES 1.1 MILLION Illegal Aliens EVERY YEAR! Trump Says Only A FOOL Would Support.
To view online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JMe6uwK-BA
Independents, Hispanics and Parents Turn on Biden in Battleground States Over Crushing Inflation
By Manzanita Miller
Despite President Joe Biden’s best efforts to paint a rosy economic picture nine months out from the general election, Americans largely blame his administration for crippling inflation and stagnant wages. New polling shows Hispanics, Independents and parents/homemakers in battleground states are particularly critical of the Biden economy and declare they were better off under Trump by wide double digits.
According to CNN, Biden is mystified by the public’s bleak view of the economy and has been asking his advisors why public perception remains so low when it comes to his economic record. The latest CNN poll shows Americans say 55% to 26% that Biden’s policies have weakened the economy, and his approval rating on handling the economy sits at a low of 37%.
While the Biden Administration has touted moderate job growth in recent months, Americans continue to point the finger at crushing inflation. The consumer price index has increased 17.6 percent since Biden took office according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and wages have failed to keep up. Wages have risen a mere 15 percent during Biden’s term, less than half what they rose under Trump.
Under the Trump Administration personal income rose 33.5 percent between Jan. 2017 and Jan. 2021, and inflation rose just 7.8 percent. Americans had more income to spend, and more to save, and that fact is at the heart of the public’s supposed “disconnect” when it comes to accepting the White House’s rosy economic message.
In swing states, the reality of a decline in the standard of living under the Biden Administration is undeniable. A detailed February Morning Consult poll of battleground states shows that voters look back fondly on the Trump economy, and believe their lives have worsened since Biden took control.
Americans say by 21 points – 51% to 30% – their financial situation was better under Trump than Biden according to the poll. Independents are some of Biden’s harshest critics. Women who don’t lean toward either party and self-identify as independents say their financial situation was better under Trump by 27 points – 49% to 22%. Men say so by 28 points – 51% to 23%. Moderates also believe they were better off under Trump, saying so by 11 points – 43% to 32%.
Parents are one of the hardest hit groups when it comes to their current financial situation, saying by a 30-point margin – 56% to 26% – they were better off under the Trump economy. Homemakers who presumably do most of the shopping for their households strongly assert their financial situations were better under Trump. Homemakers say by a vast 47-point margin – 65% to 18% – their families were better off under Trump.
The poll also shows Hispanics and Whites are nearly identical in their views of the economy now compared to the economy during the Trump Administration. There is a negligible difference between how Hispanics and Whites view their financial situation under Trump – both groups assert they were better off under Trump by double-digits. Whites say by a 30-point margin – 56% to 26% – they were better off under Trump, and Hispanics say so by a 24-point margin, 55% to 31%.
Americans also say by a 23-point margin – 54% to 31% – they trust Trump more than Biden to handle the economy going forward. Whites and Hispanics trust Trump to handle the economy over Biden by nearly the same margins – 27 points for Whites and 25 points for Hispanics.
While a plurality of Blacks trust Biden to handle the economy more than Trump, a full quarter – 25% – trust Trump more. Independent men trust Trump to handle the economy over Biden by 26 points, and independent women trust Trump more by 21 points. Once again, homemakers trust Trump to handle the economy by the widest margin – 44 percentage points.
Biden may be wondering why there is a “disconnect” between the message his reelection campaign is running with and public perception, but Americans are looking at the numbers. By verifiable metrics, the American people had more discretionary income under Trump as consumer prices were significantly lower and wages were higher relative to inflation.
Swing voters, including Hispanics and Independents, are some of Biden’s harshest critics, as are parents and homemakers attempting to make ends meet with children in the picture. Without acknowledging the struggle Americans are facing due in no small part to his own economic policies, Biden will have a difficult time bridging the “disconnect”.
Manzanita Miller is an associate analyst at Americans for Limited Government Foundation.
To view online: https://dailytorch.com/2024/02/independents-hispanics-and-parents-turn-on-biden-in-battleground-states-over-crushing-inflation/
ALG urges no vote on Senate illegal immigration legalization bill
Don’t tie Trump’s hands in 2025
Feb. 6, 2024, Fairfax, Va.—Americans for Limited Government President Rick Manning today issued the following statement in opposition to the Senate $118 billion foreign aid and border supplemental:
“The Senate immigration proposal legislatively locks in illegal immigration levels of millions for years to come, and specifically would prohibit former President Trump in 2025 should he win from closing the border. Any action that transforms illegal immigration into legal entrance into our country will have permanent, negative, long-term consequences for our nation and must be opposed. It is incredible that Republicans in the Senate would even consider voting for legislation designed to tie Trump’s hands in 2025 and beyond.”
To view online: https://getliberty.org/2024/02/alg-urges-no-vote-on-senate-illegal-immigration-legalization/