Two lawsuits challenging new maps have very different intentions.

[link removed]
2/2/2024

============================================================

Democracy and voting rights suffered a string of defeats in the courtroom and elsewhere this week. None were as crushing as one from the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which declined to reconsider a panel decision that severely weakened a key section of the Voting Rights Act.

Elsewhere, Republicans in Arizona and Georgia chose foes of democracy for major positions, and two lawsuits, with very different intentions, are challenging newly enacted maps.

Republicans Elevate Election Deniers and Vote Suppressors To Key Positions

On Monday, the Arizona Republican Party ** elected ([link removed])
Gina Swoboda to be the party’s next chairperson following the abrupt resignation of Jeff DeWit, who found himself ensnared in a bribery scandal involving U.S. Senate candidate and prolific election-denier Kari Lake. Swoboda’s candidacy had been endorsed both by Lake and Trump, with the former describing the new chairperson as “a national leader in election law.” Swoboda previously ** served ([link removed])
on Lake’s 2022 campaign for governor and was ** Trump’s ([link removed])
2020 Election Day director of operations.

DeWit’s scandal came to light last week after a secret recording, seemingly leaked by Lake, caught DeWit inquiring about an effort to bribe Lake to stay out of the upcoming Senate race. DeWit had ** told ([link removed])
Lake that “very powerful people” wanted to keep her out of the race and that they were ** wondering ([link removed])
if there were “any companies out there or something that could just put her on the payroll to keep her out?”

The call took place nearly a year ago, but was only leaked just last week. Beyond having also worked in the Arizona secretary of state’s office and serving as an election advisor to the Arizona Senate, Swoboda also runs the ** Voter Reference Foundation ([link removed])
(VoteRef). The conservative group publishes voter information online, is funded by a billionaire Trump donor and has consistently spread conspiracies about election fraud.

Since her election, Swoboda has already ** defended ([link removed])
lawsuits filed by Republicans in the state ** challenging ([link removed])
the use of drop boxes and ** advocating ([link removed])
for stringent signature matching. She also had previewed lawsuits that would soon be filed by Republican legislators and the state party challenging portions of the state’s election procedure manual — one of which came to fruition on Wednesday. Republican legislative leaders in the state ** filed ([link removed])
a ** lawsuit ([link removed])
challenging multiple provisions of the manual including those related to voter registration cancellation, certifying elections, the state’s active early voting list and more.
** ([link removed])

** Ohio's New Motto: Give Us The Ballot ([link removed])

By Katy Shanahan

Meanwhile, the Georgia Senate ** confirmed ([link removed])
an election denier to the board that oversees the state’s elections. Rick Jeffares, who once served as a Republican state senator, was appointed in a 32-17 ** vote ([link removed])
last Friday to serve on a five-member panel in charge of enforcing election rules and regulations, along with investigating complaints about election procedures.

Jeffares has a ** history ([link removed])
of election denialism, suggesting on social media in the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election that dead people had voted and that Democrats had cheated in order to win. The board Jeffares now sits on has its own history of problematic conduct surrounding elections. Around the same time as Jeffares’ social media posts, the board was investigating similar unfounded claims of election fraud pushed by far-right politicians and conspiracy theorists.

In a speech opposing Jeffares’ nomination, Jason Esteves, a Democratic state senator from Atlanta, ** said ([link removed])
that the move “will only serve to further” conspiracy theories “and undermine the people’s confidence in Georgia’s elections.” The confirmation of Jeffares gives Republicans a 4-1 majority on the State Election Board.

Friend and Foe Lawsuits Filed Challenging Recently Enacted Maps

On Wednesday, 12 “non-African American'' voters filed a ** lawsuit ([link removed])
challenging Louisiana’s newly-enacted congressional map that created two majority-Black districts. Two weeks ago, the state ** enacted ([link removed])
a new congressional map after multiple courts ** found ([link removed])
that the previous map likely violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

The new map drastically increases the Black makeup of the 6th Congressional District, giving Black voters the ability to elect a candidate of their choice to the seat currently held by a white Republican.

Yet the group of voters involved in Wednesday’s suit — who describe themselves as “non-African American” — took exception to the newly adequate Black representation in the state, claiming that the new map is an unconstitutional racial gerrymander that involves “the intentional discrimination against voters based on race.” The plaintiffs allege that the map, which was implemented expressly in order to remedy a Voting Rights Act violation, violates the 14th and 15th Amendments and should be blocked from use in all future elections.

The same day, with a much different intention, North Carolina voters ** launched ([link removed])
a new state-level ** lawsuit ([link removed])
challenging the state’s recently enacted congressional and legislative maps, which were redrawn by the Republican-dominated Legislature in October.

The North Carolina Legislature’s redrawing of the state’s congressional and legislative maps ensued nearly five months after the North Carolina Supreme Court’s newly constituted Republican majority ** overturned ([link removed])
its prior decisions prohibiting partisan gerrymandering in an April 2023 decision. That ruling prohibited any future partisan gerrymandering challenges to any North Carolina map under the state constitution’s Free Elections Clause.

The lawsuit, the first of its kind to be filed in state court and the ** fourth ([link removed])
legal challenge to the new maps, hinges on a novel legal argument that asserts the districts violate the state constitution. Plaintiffs contend that the North Carolina General Assembly drew the maps in a way that created an unfair partisan advantage for GOP candidates, in turn violating the right to “fair” elections. Notably, a right to “fair” elections is not stated in the North Carolina Constitution, but a right to “frequent” and “free” elections is, which plaintiffs allege must “surely” guarantee that right to “fair” elections as well. The novel lawsuit differs from those filed in federal court, which made federal arguments under the Voting Rights Act and U.S. Constitution.

The lawsuit points to the 6th, 13th and 14th Congressional Districts — which encompass Davidson, Franklin and Burke Counties respectively — as those that unduly favor Republicans in violation of “fair elections.” The complaint also challenges the 7th state Senate District and the 105th state House district. Plaintiffs ask that the state court prohibit the use of the challenged maps for future elections.
** ([link removed])

** Ev ([link removed])
** ery Vote Counts Unless the GOP Doesn't Like It ([link removed])

By Jessica Pishko

8th Circuit Maintains Devastating Decision That Guts the Voting Rights Act

A backbreaking November decision for the Voting Rights Act grew all the more worrying Tuesday after the entire 8th Circuit ** denied ([link removed])
a request to rehear it. An 8th Circuit panel had previously ** ruled ([link removed])
that private parties can not sue under ** Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act ([link removed])
— a decades-old federal civil rights provision that prohibits racially discriminatory voting laws and maps.

The catastrophic ruling meant that all voters and groups covered by the 8th Circuit — Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North and South Dakota — could not bring Section 2 claims, leaving the power solely to the U.S. attorney general.

Plaintiffs had subsequently ** asked ([link removed])
the full 8th Circuit to rehear the panel’s 2023 decision, a request that was denied over the objections of three judges on the court, two of whom were Republican appointees. The dissenters called Tuesday’s decision “ambitious and unprecedented,” rife with “illogical thinking.” The Chief Judge of the Circuit, Lavenski Smith, reiterated a devastating ** finding ([link removed])
by a voting rights expert that only 15 of the 182 successful Section 2 cases in the last four decades have been brought by the U.S. attorney general.

The decision by the 8th Circuit not to rehear the panel’s decision means that the ruling can now only be remedied by the U.S. Supreme Court, if plaintiffs choose to appeal. If the Court were to take the case, it could settle the question entirely — returning the right to private parties in all 50 states or stripping it from the entire nation.

In response to the decision, Janai Nelson, president of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, ** wrote ([link removed])
that “[t]his is a dismal day for voting rights in this country at a time when we can hardly afford to leave our democracy any weaker. We must fully restore the Voting Rights Act and elect a Congress who will take up this critical charge.”

Section 2 has had an implied private right of action dating all the way back to its 1965 enactment. There is an established precedent for the right in the 5th, 6th and 11th U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals, and just last month the entire 5th Circuit ** rejected ([link removed])
a Louisiana effort to overturn a decision explicitly holding that a private right of action exists under Section 2.

FROM MARC: Disqualifying Trump Is on the Docket
** ([link removed])

While we should take solace in the fact that no prior president has acted as recklessly as Trump, that is not a reason to ignore Section 3 of the 14th Amendment now. By Marc Elias. ** Read more ([link removed])
➡️

What We’re Doing

The race to the Republican nomination continues full-steam ahead next week, when Nevada Republicans participate in a confusing and controversial duo of primary and caucus all within two days. On Monday, look out for an explainer detailing everything you need to know about the elections, as well as a separate piece on how election officials on the ground are preparing for them.

Valentine's Day is quickly approaching! Show love to your fur-ever valentine with our Paw-lentine’s Day Bundle! 🐾💝
** Order ([link removed])
by Feb. 6 to receive your merch by Feb. 14.
** ([link removed])

A new episode of our podcast Defending Democracy dropped this morning! In today’s episode, Marc and Paige discuss how little mistakes on ballots can silence the voices of voters. Listen on ** Apple ([link removed])
, ** Spotify ([link removed])
or ** wherever you get your podcasts ([link removed])
, or watch it on ** YouTube ([link removed])
.
** Democracy Docket Twitter ([link removed])
** Democracy Docket Website (democracydocket.com)
** Democracy Docket Instagram ([link removed])
** Democracy Docket Facebook ([link removed])
** Defending Democracy Podcast ([link removed])
We depend on the support of our readers to keep bringing you the latest on the fight for democracy. You can help ** keep our content free ([link removed])
and available for all today. Want to change how you receive these emails? You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.

Copyright © 2023 Democracy Docket, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
250 Massachusetts Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20001