|
|
Friend,
For as long as I’ve been in public service, I’ve been laser-focused on standards and accountability for our government’s most powerful institutions – a focus that has only grown more important in the past year when it comes to our U.S. Supreme Court.
|
Last year, our highest court faced a crisis of confidence: numerous reports of egregious corruption from Justices Thomas and Alito alongside out-of-control, extremist decisions.
This year, the Court will once again be hearing and ruling on some of the most consequential cases in our history. And yet, there is not a single camera in the courtroom to allow for a real-time broadcast. Not one single visual record.
|
In fact, broadcast and visual recordings are barred in many federal courts for outdated and outlandish reasons. Having argued four cases before the U.S. Supreme Court – and many other lower federal courts – I find reading the bench crucial to understanding the Justices. The American people should be afforded this same privilege.
|
There is judicial resistance to this needed form of accountability, but a bipartisan legislative effort is underway: I'm working on a bill that would mandate real-time broadcasts in the Supreme Court, with safeguards to prevent abuses. Visibility and transparency are vital – for the Court's credibility and the viability of our democracy.
But as this campaign for transparency gets underway, I need grassroots supporters like you to advocate alongside me: Will you please sign my new petition demanding the U.S. Supreme Court provide a real-time broadcast of its proceedings? I'm counting on your signature before 11:59 p.m. tonight.
|
Thank you,
Dick
|
|
|
|
|
|
|