From Dawn Collier <[email protected]>
Subject Reality Check: Half of California’s energy comes from crude oil
Date January 26, 2024 6:44 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Another 34 percent comes from natural gas

View this email in your browser ([link removed])


** Reality Check: Half of California’s energy comes from crude oil
------------------------------------------------------------

Dear John,

Here’s a reality check that ought to keep politicians up at night in California. Despite being a sunny, solar-friendly state, with ample areas blessed with high wind ([link removed]) , California still derives 50 percent of its total energy from crude oil. Another 34 percent comes from natural gas. This fossil fuel total for California energy, 84 percent, actually exceeds the world average for 2022 ([link removed]) , which — including coal — came in at 82 percent.

These figures come from the U.S. Energy Information Administration report “California Energy Consumption Estimates – Consumption by Source ([link removed]) ” for 2021, which is the most recent year for which data is posted. This data is verified by another EIA report, produced in conjunction with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, “California Energy Consumption in 2021 ([link removed]) .”

So from two authoritative sources we get the same result: half the fuel Californians rely on to power their civilization comes from crude oil. And yet California’s state legislature has declared war on oil, along with natural gas. And here, it gets even more interesting.

Also relying on EIA statistics, but turning to a chart featured in “California Energy Production Estimates, 2021 ([link removed]) ,” it is possible to determine how much oil and natural gas is produced in-state. The numbers are shocking.

Californians import 93 percent of their natural gas, and 76 percent of their crude oil.

Another chart, “Foreign Sources of Crude Oil Imports to California ([link removed]) ,” courtesy of the California Energy Commission, shows where it comes from: Iraq 22.3%, Ecuador 16.9%, Saudi Arabia 16.4%, Brazil 13.5%, Colombia 7%, Guyana 6.3%, Mexico 4.6%, Canada 4.1%, faraway Kazakhstan 2.0%, and assorted other nations, another 7 percent.

Since half of California’s energy comes from oil, it’s easy to quantify the impact if problems arise with the supply from any of these nations. More to the point, why aren’t we drilling here in California?

Won’t our drilling practices be more environmentally responsible? And won’t it benefit the environment to not have dozens of oil tankers perpetually belching bunker fuel ([link removed]) exhaust off the coast of Long Beach, and that only after they’ve belched their way across the Pacific Ocean? Even if Californians cut consumption of oil by 50 percent, we would still have to more than double our production of in-state oil before we’d eliminate imported oil.

Instead of recognizing that renewable energy technologies are not ready to pick up the slack, the state legislature has taken further steps to end oil production in California. SB 1137 ([link removed]) , signed by Governor Newsom in 2022, creates “health protection zones” within 3,200 feet of any “sensitive receptor,” i.e., any establishment open to the public or any residence.

The practical impact of SB 1137 will not only be to ban most future drilling, but also impose restrictions (and invite lawsuits) that will compel the shutdowns of existing wells. Fighting for its life, and in the interests of all working Californians, the industry has qualified a referendum ([link removed](2024)) on SB 1137 that will be on the state ballot this November.

The big alleged problem? The unhealthy air quality caused by methane leaks from these wells. But methane is lighter than air ([link removed]) , meaning whatever minor leakage may occur at any of California’s strictly monitored wells will quickly dissipate upwards. Perhaps we may fulminate over the supposed climate impact of releasing methane into our atmosphere. But exporting that problem to other nations where wells will be even more prone to methane leakage is not a moral choice. It just kills good jobs right here in California.

California consumes 1.8 million barrels of oil per day, but only produces 463,000 barrels per day ([link removed]) . In 1986, its production peak, California produced 1.1 million barrels per day ([link removed]) .

The state did not run out of oil and gas reserves ([link removed]) . The industry ran into the regulators.

What California’s policymakers have not come to terms with is the fact that we are importing nearly everything relating to energy production in California. Not just crude oil and natural gas, but wind turbines ([link removed]) and blades, photovoltaic panels ([link removed]) , and batteries ([link removed]) .

How is this considered sustainable? We have created a regulatory environment in California where it is nearly impossible to dig, drill, develop, mine, log, graze, grow, or manufacture anything.

Governor Newsom needs to face the reality that fossil fuel is going to be an integral part of California’s energy landscape for decades to come, and that he is obligated to preserve the quality of life it enables. Newsom needs to work with energy producers, water agencies, and farming interests to formulate a new agenda for the state that puts people first.

— By CPC senior fellow Edward Ring. To learn more about energy and water policy in California — and real-world solutions for energy and water abundance — subscribe to Ring’s weekly newsletter “What’s Current.” ([link removed])

Subscribe to What's Current with Edward Ring ([link removed])
[link removed]


** Reserve your spot at CPC's Parents, Not Partisans Summit in Sacramento!
------------------------------------------------------------
Have you registered yet for California Policy Center's 3rd annual Parents, Not Partisans Summit in Sacramento on Tuesday, March 12—Wednesday, March 13, 2024? Our theme this year: Who Controls the Classoom?

Don't miss this FREE 2-day event that's bringing together parent advocates, education reform leaders, school board members and some of California's best grassroots strategists to train, network and mobilize for action in 2024!

We'll hear from Connor Boyack, president of the Libertas Institute and creator of the popular Tuttle Twins children's series, as one of our keynote speakers!

Plus, we'll meet at the Capitol on Day Two for a special session with Capitol experts on persuasive advocacy techniques before heading out to meet with legislators and their staff.

Seating is limited, so don’t delay! Register ([link removed]) today to reserve your spot at the Parents, Not Partisans Summit! Tickets are FREE using the code PARENTUNION at checkout.

CPC's annual Parents, Not Partisans Summit would not be possible without the generous support of our sponsors and donors like you. Your donation goes directly to supporting the Summit and travel scholarships for parent advocates. Donate online here ([link removed]) or contact Jackson Reese (mailto:[email protected]) for information on becoming an event sponsor.

SPONSOR A PARENT ADVOCATE ([link removed])
New Podcast ()
[link removed]


** Radio Free California #315: Their Satanic Majesty’s Many Requests
------------------------------------------------------------
On this week's podcast with CPC president Will Swaim and CPC board member David Bahnsen: The Satanic Temple opens a kids’ club on the campus of an Orange County elementary school. Newsom hits South Carolina to tub-thump for Joe Biden. Bonus: Will talks with Liberty Justice Center president Jacob Huebert about their legal battle with California AG Rob Bonta over parental rights. Listen now. ([link removed])

SUPPORT CPC ([link removed])

============================================================

ABOUT THE CALIFORNIA POLICY CENTER

The California Policy Center promotes prosperity for all Californians through limited government and individual liberty.

Learn more at ** CaliforniaPolicyCenter.org ([link removed])
.
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
Copyright © 2024 California Policy Center, All rights reserved.
We send periodic updates to those who opted in on californiapolicycenter.org

Our mailing address is:
California Policy Center
18002 Irvine Blvd Ste 108
Tustin, CA 92780-3321
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis