Standing Up for Law Abiding Wyoming Gun
Owners |
In
April of 2018, Michael Cargill of Texas bought two bump stocks for the same reason people across Wyoming purchase firearms every day – to
protect himself, his family and his property. Days later the Bureau of Alcohol
Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) issued a ban on bump stocks under the National Firearms Act. It is not only an egregious violation of the
people of Wyoming’s right to bear arms, but also represents a dangerous new frontier of federal bureaucrats interpreting federal law in
expansive ways Congress clearly did not intend. Federal agencies, like the ATF, do
not make laws. Their sole job is to interpret existing laws passed by Congress, not grant itself sweeping authority to confiscate firearms from
law-abiding Wyoming gun owners as is the case with the bump stock ban. Luckily, Michael
Cargill fought back against the ATF. The very same day he turned in his bump stocks to comply with federal law, he filed a lawsuit in federal district
court in Texas challenging the ban on numerous grounds. While the district court and a
three-judge appeals court panel of the Fifth Circuit sided with the ATF, the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed the lower
court’s decision and found the ban to be unconstitutional. The Biden
administration appealed the ruling and the case is now being heard before the Supreme Court. I am leading an amici curiae brief in the U.S. Supreme Court case alongside 8 other U.S. Senators and multiple legal experts,
including University of Wyoming Law Professor George A. Mocsary. The brief urges the court to side with Cargill and preserve the people of
Wyoming’s right to bear arms. Garland v.
Cargill represents a true fork-in-the-road moment for gun rights in America. The people of Wyoming have a long history of responsible gun
ownership, and I will not allow gun grabbers in Washington to change that. Happy Trails,
|